Post on 25-Jul-2020
27 – 38-27
: *
1 2
: 13/09/1393 : 19/01/1394
.
.
. .
.
. 4 ×5
. 42/64 % .
.
1. . 2 .
* .
– 9 1394 28 1 -
80 % 2000
4 % .
. 2 )Andrejko, 2008: 10.(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
) ( ) ( .
. .
)Hasemi, Fayaz and Sarshar, 2010: 1824 .(
. 1903
70
. 1978 1 2 3 .
)Alessi, 2006: 6 .( 1980
)Zhou, Chen, 2010: 1322 .(
90
)Alessi, 2008: 6 .( 1998
. 4 .
1 : )Alessi,
2008: 6.(
29
) : (
.
.
.
.
. 4 ×5
3 .
.
42/64 %
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 2-
.
.
.
.
. 2/0 2
.
.
.
.
. )Dickson, 2006: 8.(
– 9 1394 30
)( ) (
)( )( 2 : ( ( ( (
.
) 2 .(
3 -
.
.
. 4 -
.
. .
.
.
.
:
) . 1384: 120.(
) 1385: 170.(
.
.
.
) 1385 :102 .(
.
31
) : (
.
.
.
.
5 -
) 1389: 39 .(
. .
) 1390: 2 .(
. .
) (
. .
) 1387: 66 .( 1
. 2 .
1 :
2 : ) 1391: 59(
)m2(
)m2(
)m(
)w/m2c(
)w/m2c(
)w/m2c(
72/164 39/60 36% 5/0 63/0- 58/1 - 5 13% 64/241 34/77 32% 5/0 63/0- 58/1 - 5 9%
26/195 7/53 27% 5/0 63/0- 58/1 - 5 14%
1/104 95/21 21% 5/0 63/0- 58/1 - 5 8%
– 9 1394 32
1 2
.
.
.
.
.
. 3 3
.
3 : ) 1391: 59(
3 :
)m2(
)m2(
)w/m2c(
)w/m2c(
)m(
85/101 5/42 41% 63/2 - 8/5 2/0 45/68 83/26 39% 77/2 - 8/5 2/0 25/79 28/24 30% 77/2 - 8/5 2/0 54/61 08/19 31% 77/2 - 8/5 2/0 91/62 4/20 32% 77/2 - 8/5 2/0
2
w/m2c 58/1 63/2 77/2 .
.
w/m2c 5
w/m2c 8/58 .
.
.
.
33
) : (
.
.
.
.
.
. 4 .
)( )(
4 : ( (
.
. . .
.
. 5 6
.
5 : ) ( ) ( )
(
9 )(
9 )(
9 )(
– 9 1394 34
) ( ) ( ) ( 6 : ( ( ( )(
.
.
.
.
) ( ) ( .
) ( ) (
. 7 .
)( )( )( )( 7 : : ( ( : ( (
)(
7
.
.
.
.
. .
. . 8
)Gratia, De Herde, 2006: 200 .(
35
) : (
. )Alessi, 2008:
17 .(
.
.
.
.
. 9 .
8 : )Gratia, De Herde, 2006: 200(
)( )( 9 : )(
6 - ) (
.
4 5 3 .
30 . 70
. 90 210 .
6
. cm10 ) ( .
. cm 70
. .
. 10
.
– 9 1394 36
10 : ) ( ) (
.
. ) (
. . 4 .
4 :
Cooling set point
temperature
Heating set back
temperature
Heating set point
temperatureActivity(metabolic) Occupancy Activity
template
24c 12c 22c Light office work 0.1110 people/m2
Green office area
Zone multiplier
Summer clothing (clo)
Winter clothing (clo)
Office equipment(Gain)
Target luminance (lux)
Control type
Cooling set back
temperature 20.5 1.0015 w/m2300lux-liner 32c
Zone type Lighting control type
Lighting energy Lumiair type Fresh air (l/s-
person) Mech vent
cooling (o C) Cavity Liner 5 w/m2-100lux Suspended 10.000 24c
.
5 11 15 .
5 :
[kwh]
[kwh]
[kwh]
[kwh]
392/1896 986/57 128/700 506/2654 524/1806 630/20 759/761 912/2588
80/8 % .
.
.
.
42/64 % .
.
37
) : (
)(
)(
11 : - - - : ( (
)( )( 12 : : ( (
)( )( 13 : - - : (
(
)( )( 14: : ( (
)( )( 15 : : ( (
7 -
.
.
.
– 9 1394 38
.
. .
.
.
.
.
42/64 %
.
1. Canon 2. Hok 3. Hooker 4. Debis Tower
- Alessi B., (2008), Double Skin Façade & its benefits, Dissertation Report, Copenhagen Technical Academy. - Andrejko DA, (2008), Do not Harm: Preparing the Architecture Profession for the 21 Century, Oxford
Conference 2008, Oxford, UK. - Dickson A., (2006), Modeling Double Skin Façade, A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of msc Energy
Systems & the Environment, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow UK. - Gratia E, De Herde A., (2006), Greenhouse Effect in Double-Skin Façade, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 21, pp.
199-211. - Hashemi N, Fayaz R, Sarshar M., (2010), Thermal Behaviour of a Ventilated Double Skin Facade in Hot Arid
Climate, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 42, pp. 1823-1832. - Juan ZH, Youming CH, (2010), A Review on Applying Ventilated Double-Skin Facade to Buildings in Hot-
Summer and Cold-Winter Zone in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, pp. 1321-1328.
- )1390( 3 . 10-1.
- )1391( 7 . 62-53.
- )1387( 18 19 . 64-66. - )1385( . - )1385( ) (
. - )1384( . - )1389( - :
130 . 49-38.