Presentación Abet 1 Presentación Final

«NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING»«FACULTY OF GEOLOGICAL, MINING AND METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING”

«PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SCHOOL OF MINES»

“ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA IN THE SELECTION OF A TAILINGS DAM”

SUBJECT :

MINERAL ECONOMICS AND VALUATION OF MINES.

MEMBERS: GIANFRANCO LÓPEZ REQUELME HUGO DEUDOR BENAVENTE JEAN CRUZ RIVAS RENZO TEJADA HERRERA RONALD ROJAS GUERRERO VICTOR JUAREZ RACCHUMI

PROFESSOR :

ROBERTO MALDONADO ASTORGA

INDEX:

I. OBJECTIVESII. INTRODUCTIONIII. MATRIXIV. APPLICATIONV. DISPOSAL METHOD SELECTIONVI. CONCLUSIONSVII. BIBLIOGRAPHY

I. OBJECTIVESGENERAL:

To develop a methodology for selecting the best option of a tailings dam.

SPECIFICS:

Using a decision matrix in the selection of Tailing Pond with technical and economic criteria.

Show the most important scaling parameters to be taken into account in a tailings pond.

Allow tailings ponds are friendly to the environment.

II. INTRODUCTION

«TAILINGS POND»

III. DECISION MATRIX

Maximize the stability of the deposit - 22%

Minimize the volume of wall fillings - 18%

Optimizing the use of the

tributary basin – 15%

Minimize infiltration to

groundwater – 5%

To minimize transportation costs tailings

site - 18%

minimize the negative public

perception – 22%

DECISION MATRIX

MAXIMIZE THE STABILITY OF THE DEPOSIT - 22%

ANALYSIS OF STABILITY OF STRUCTURE

Stability against liquefaction

Stability against overflow

Stability against internal erosion

MINIMIZE THE VOLUME OF WALL FILLINGS - 18%

Important criteria to ensure the economic feasibility of the disposal system.

OPTIMIZING THE USE OF THE TRIBUTARY BASIN – 15%

Increase in capital Increase operating costs

Environmental management.

WE SHOULD

MINIMIZE INFILTRATION TO GROUNDWATER – 5%

EFFECTS

Ground water pollution.

Biodiversity damage.

TO MINIMIZE TRANSPORTATION COSTS TAILINGS SITE - 18%

KEY PARAMETERS

Tailings volume to transport

Process plant to tailings dam distance

MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE PUBLIC PERCEPTION – 22%Main criteria due to the current sensitivity and the negative predisposition of the population to deposits Tailings.

Sinaycocha Tailings Ponds

IV. APPLICATION

• Name of the project : UNI 2016 • Surface mining operation producing copper• Daily production of tailings : 80000 tons.• Life of mine (LOM): 20 years• Production of tailings : 400 Mm3

SITES IDENTIFICATION

UNI 2016 MINE

PRELIMINARY SELECTION STAGE

PRE - SELECTED SITES

SITE VOLUME OF DAM (Mm3) DAM HEIGHT (m) LENGTH OF DAM (m)

2 440 15 2200

3 407 200 1670

4 445 220 1245

6 416 130 953

8 402 120 2225

9b 424 210 1174

EVALUATION SUMMARY FOR TAILINGS DISPOSAL SITES

QUALIFICATIONS AND RANKING – CONVENTIONAL DISPOSAL CAS

SITEIMPOUND

MENT STABILITY

MINIMIZE NEGATIVE PERCEPTION (22%)

MINIMIZE CONVEYA

NC E COST (18%)

MINIMIZE DAM

VOLUME (18%

MINIMIZE WATER

MANAGE MENT

COSTS (15%)

MINIMIZE SEEPAGE

(5%) WEIGHTED SCORE RANKING

2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2.78 4°

3 3 2 4 3 3 3 2.96 2°

4 3 4 5 3 3 4 3.63 1°

6 2 4 3 1 4 3 2.79 3°

8 2 3 1 4 3 2 2.55 6°

9b 2 4 1 5 2 3 2.85 5°

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: LOCATION OF PLANT NON-RELEVANT FOR TAILINGS IMPOUNDMENT LOCATION QUALIFICATIONS AND RANKING – CONVENTIONAL DISPOSAL WITHOUT CONVEYANCE

SiteImpound

ment Stability

Minimize negative perception (27%)

Minimize conveyanc e cost (0 %)

Minimize dam

volume (22 %

Minimize water

manage ment costs (18%)

Minimize seepage

(6%) Weighted

Score Ranking

2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2.73 5°

3 3 2 4 3 3 3 2.73 5°

4 3 4 5 3 3 4 3.11 1°

6 2 4 3 1 4 3 2.96 3°

8 2 3 1 4 3 2 2.89 4°

9b 2 4 1 5 2 3 3.04 2°

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: INCREASING RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE PERMITS AND REGULATORY ASPECTS QUALIFICATION AND RANKING – CONVENTIONAL DISPOSAL WITH MORE IMPORTANCE

TO REGULATORY ASPECTS

SiteImpound

ment Stability

Minimize conveyanc e cost (5 %)

Minimize dam

volume (5 %

Minimize water

manage ment

costs (23 %)

Minimize seepage (23%)

Weighted Score Ranking

2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2.78 4°

3 3 2 4 3 3 3 2.83 3°

4 3 4 5 3 3 4 3.50 1°

6 2 4 3 1 4 3 3.18 2°

8 2 3 1 4 3 2 2.50 6°

9b 2 4 1 5 2 3 2.72 5°

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: SENSITIVITY: INCREASING RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF COSTS

QUALIFICATIONS AND RANKING – CONVENTIONAL DISPOSAL WITH MORE IMPORTANCE TO COSTS

SiteImpound

ment Stability

Minimize conveyanc e cost (25%)

Minimize dam

volume (25 %

Minimize water

manage ment

costs (5 %)

Minimize seepage

(5%) Weighted

Score Ranking

2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2.80 4°

3 3 2 4 3 3 3 3.05 2°

4 3 4 5 3 3 4 3.50 1°

6 2 4 3 1 4 3 2.80 3°

8 2 3 1 4 3 2 2.50 6°

9b 2 4 1 5 2 3 2.70 5°

V. DISPOSAL METHOD SELECTION: CONVENTIONAL OR THICKENED

Advantages of the thickened tailings method:• Greater water recovery in the thickeners, which in the

case for site 4,would be located relatively close to the concentrator.

• Lower tailings water seepage into the subsurface water tables.

• Lower closure costs of the tailings facility.

DISPOSAL METHOD SELECTION: CONVENTIONAL OR THICKENED

Disadvantages of the thickened tailings method:• The operational costs of a thickened tailings

impoundment are relatively high. • The technologies for tailings thickening and

conveyance for concentrations greater than 65% and with production rates of 80 ktpd are relatively new and have not been proven.

VI. CONCLUSIONS

• The main tool used for choosing the tailings dam was the decision matrix.

• Applying the decision matrix, you can know that the most suitable alternative to deposit tailings is the site 4.

• Choosing a tailings deposit must be done from a technical, economical and ecological aproach.

VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY

• Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería. (2003). CONSTRUCCIÓN Y OPERACIÓN DE TRANQUES DE RELAVES. [online] Available at: http://www.sernageomin.cl/pdf/mineria/ambiente/construccion_operacion_tranques.pdf [Accessed 10 Jun. 2016].

• Cortés Cortés, J. and Dunstan Silva., J. (2008). MODELO DE AUDITORÍA AMBIENTAL PARA TRANQUES DE RELAVE. [online] Available at: http://www1.gorecoquimbo.gob.cl/tesis/descarga/2007/Modelo%20de%20auditoria.pdf [Accessed 10 Jun. 2016].

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION !!!

Presentación Abet 1 Presentación Final

Documents

Transcript of Presentación Abet 1 Presentación Final

Presentación ATAM Final Final Final

Presentación utp (final)(final)

Acreditación Internacional ABET Visita de Acreditación · Acreditación Internacional ABET Visita de Acreditación UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE INGENIERÍA Dr. Ing. Antonio Morán Cárdenas

Presentación Final 29_08_2012 final

Capacitacion ceaaces modelo abet taller 2

Acreditada por ABET La FIC avanza firme

Síilabo Abet Ms112

Presentación Bucyrus. FINAL! FINAL FINAL

BOLETÍN DE LA FACULTAD DE Acreditada por ABET el país …

Informe Constitución Comité Asesor ABET-CAC · proceso de acreditación. Se proveyó un marco conceptual sobre lo que es acreditación, el rol de la agencia acreditadora ABET y

Presentación Final Gestion Estrategica(Final)

Presentación de PowerPoint - UNI – Towards ABET ...acreditacion.uni.edu.pe/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Acreditacion... · URP – 4 Programas ... Informe de Fin de Ciclo Proyectos

080305 ABET FAQ por Ricardo Cuya [Modo de compatibilidad]

Presentacion abet fip

Estadistica Formato Abet

La experiencia de un evaluador ABET en EEUU

Presentación final

PresentacióN Final.

Indice Educacion Quimica 22 años despues de iniciar ABET ...

Acreditación ABET de la Titulación de Ingeniería Química ... · Acreditación ABET de la Titulación de Ingeniería Química del IQS Inece’07-UPM Madrid, 11 Diciembre 2007.