Evidence presentation

16
AT HOME WHITENING VS IN- OFFICE PROFESSIONAL WHITENING Tabasum Bukhari, Sharon John & Nancy Sahayarajah EVBP 5500 Carrie Maynard RDH July 29, 2016

Transcript of Evidence presentation

Page 1: Evidence presentation

AT HOME WHITENING VS IN-OFFICE PROFESSIONAL WHITENING

Tabasum Bukhari, Sharon John & Nancy SahayarajahEVBP 5500

Carrie Maynard RDHJuly 29, 2016

Page 2: Evidence presentation

PICO Question◦ Is In-Office Professional whitening more effective compared to at-home whitening?

Page 3: Evidence presentation

Types of whitening options Include:◦ In-Office Professional Whitening◦ At-Home Tray whitening ◦Crest White Strips◦ DIY Whitening◦ Banana Peel ◦ Baking Soda◦ Coconut Oil

◦Whitening Tooth Paste ◦ Colgate Total Whitening Gel, Optic White Tooth paste ◦ Crest 3D White◦ Arm & Hammer Advance White

◦GLO Brilliant Personal Teeth Whitening Device◦ Claims to whiten teeth in 5 days, No sensitivity

Page 4: Evidence presentation
Page 5: Evidence presentation

Problem◦ Many individuals choose to whiten their teeth due to esthetics and

dissatisfaction with the colour of their teeth as seen in clinic◦ With a multitude of products on the market and in dental offices, an individual

who may consider whitening their teeth will first wonder which product is better◦ Many different products claim to be the best whitening product

Page 6: Evidence presentation

Intervention◦ Through many studies and research, it is proven that having your

teeth professionally whitened, whether it would be at home whitening or office whitening is more effective than an over the counter product (Carey, C. M., 2014) ◦More people choose In-office whitening or At-home whitening

products compared to over the counter products that may sometimes have a false claim

Page 7: Evidence presentation

Comparison◦ But the real question is: Which Whitening Treatment is more

effective ?

Page 8: Evidence presentation

Outcome◦ In-office bleaching materials contain high hydrogen peroxide

concentrations ranging from 15-38%, while the hydrogen peroxide content in at-home bleaching products usually ranges from 3% to 16% (De Geus, D., Wambier, L., Kossatz, S., Loguercio, A., and Reis, S., 2016). ◦ it is assumed that due to the high concentration of bleaching

agents in the in-office whitening products and more patient compliance to in-office treatment for any treatment, in-office whitening would be more effective in whitening teeth as opposed to at-home treatment (Giachetti, L., Bertini, F., Bambi, C., Nieri, M., & Russo, D. S., 2010).

Page 9: Evidence presentation

Products Contained in Whitening Products

◦ Two most common bleaching agents are hydrogen peroxide and carbamide peroxide (Bernardon, J., et al., 2010). ◦Carbamide peroxide, used in many bleaching products, breaks

down into hydrogen peroxide and urea, with hydrogen peroxide being the active bleaching agent (Bernardon, K., Ferrari, P., Baratieri, N., & Rauber, B., 2015).◦ A bleaching product containing 10% carbamide peroxide yields

approximately 3.5% hydrogen peroxide (Bernardon, K., et al., 2015).

Page 10: Evidence presentation

Considerations of Whitening◦ Whitening should be a client specific Treatment◦ Considerations for Whitening are◦ Sensitivity◦ Dental restorations◦ Dark stains ◦ Single dark teeth ◦ Some staining present on teeth may be due to a specific problem that

either will not be affected by whitening agents or may be a sign of disease or condition that requires further attention (Giachetti, L., et al., 2010).

◦ Patients should consult with their dentist to determine the best treatment method for them,

Page 11: Evidence presentation

Our Argument◦ In-office whitening is more effective in tooth

whitening compared to tray whitening◦ Client Compliance is better and the client

would carry through with treatment much better than skipping a day with tray whitening ◦ Costs more, therefore client compliance is

better◦ Immediate Results as it whitens up to several

shades in a one hour appointment◦ Work is done for you◦ Time it takes for appointments are shorter

than the two week period of at home whitening every night

Page 12: Evidence presentation

◦Works better on stubborn stains◦ viscosity of in office whitening agents

are less runny, therefore, better adhesion to the surface of the tooth ◦ Less damage to tissues ◦ Less treatments would need to be done

(time convenient) ◦Control of solution by dental team at an

office could prevent tissue damage and damage to restorations

Our Argument

Page 13: Evidence presentation

Cons of In-Office Whitening◦Cost ($600 & up)◦ Need to go in for whitening appointments◦May cause severe sensitivity as the peroxide content is higher◦ Pulpal irritation and sensitivity may occur with treatments that use

halogen light◦ Risk of side effects

Page 14: Evidence presentation

Counter Argument◦ Tray whitening is more effective than in-office treatment due to:

◦ More clients prefer at home whitening◦ Can be done in the comfort of your own home◦ Can be done whenever the client wants to (during the

day/night)◦ Concentration of hydrogen peroxide is less and may cause

less sensitivity in clients◦ Costs less

Page 15: Evidence presentation

Results◦ Studies have shown that at home whitening products produce

the same results as office whitening and with office whitening you still have to perform home whitening to maintain the color (Bernardon, K., et al. 2015). ◦ Studies found that although in office whitening has higher

concentrations of whitening agents, at the end of the day studies show that there is no significant difference in how white teeth become when comparing it to at home whitening (Bernardon, J., et al. 2010).

Page 16: Evidence presentation

References◦ Bernardon, K., Ferrari, P., Baratieri, N., & Rauber, B. (2015). Comparison of treatment time versus

patient satisfaction in at-home and in-office tooth bleaching therapy. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 114(6), 826-830.

◦ Bernardon, J., Sartori, N., Ballarin, A., Perdigao, J., Lopes, G., and Baratieri, L. (2010). Clinical Performance of Vital Bleaching Techniques. Operative Dentistry. 35(1), 3-10.

◦ Carey, C. M. (2014). Tooth Whitening: What We Now Know. The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, 14 Suppl, 70–76. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.02.006

◦ Dawson, P., Sharif, M., Smith, A., and Brunton, P. (2011). A Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy and Sensitivity of Home vs Combined Whitening. Operative Dentistry. 36(5), 460-466.

◦ De Geus, D., Wambier, L., Kossatz, S., Loguercio, A., and Reis, S. (2016). At-home vs In-office Bleaching: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Operative Dentistry. 37(4), 290-2964.

◦ El-Murr, J., Ruel,D., and St-Georges, A. (2011). Effects of External Bleaching on Restorative Materials: A Review. Canadian Dental Association. 71:b59, 1-6.

◦ Giachetti, L., Bertini, F., Bambi, C., Nieri, M., & Russo, D. S. (2010). A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing At-Home and In-Office Tooth Whitening Techniques. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 141(11), 1357-1364.

◦ J. B. da Costa, R. McPharlin, R. D. Paravina, and J. L. Ferracane (2010) Comparison of At-home and In-office Tooth Whitening Using a Novel Shade Guide. Operative Dentistry. 35(4), 381-388.

◦ Meireles, S., Fontes, T., Coimbra, A., Bona, D., & Demarco, F. (2012). Effectiveness of different carbamide peroxide concentrations used for tooth bleaching: An in vitro study. J. Appl. Oral Sci. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 20(2), 186-191.