7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
1/50
Introduction
The reality of human life is peculiar. It is not just another thing in the world and
universe. A range of information and different perspectives are necessary in order to
understand, explain, analyse and take it into consideration. What are we? What is the
human being? We could look in a science book for a scientific explanation, or in a
catechism or religious book to find out the religious angle, or an anthropology book to
understand the special socio-cultural characteristics. We could even resort to literature
and cinema to see ourselves as beings full of feelings and passion. While the answer
may be very simple, once we stop and think about it we realise how complicated an
issue it actually is.
The same question we ask about the human being in the general sense - "What
are we?" -, can also be asked by each of us from an individual point of view - "What are
we?" "What am I?" "Who am I?" If someone asks us, "Who are you?", we quickly give
our name, as if that explained everything. But a name is not always enough. I am my
name, but maybe it does not define me. I might have to say something more, talk aboutmy sisters and brothers, my parents, my city, my friends; or I could also describe myself:
tall or short, the colour of my hair, my constitution, etc. Or maybe I have to talk about
my achievements: what I've done, what I've achieved; or maybe, even, what I expect
to do: go to university, have a family, go on an important journey, etc All these things
define us, and, in a sense, none of these things are enough by themselves.
This is just one of the reasons why it is said that personal life, each life - not only
human life as a biological species -, requires many outlooks. It requires us to recognise
and appreciate the integral dimension of human life. Several points of view and
perspectives are needed to contemplate human life, each person's life. The samehappens when we are looking at a landscape or any other object, we only see part of
it, and we need to move around it to see other perspectives, other angles. We are not
just biology, we are not just biography, we are not just feelings, we are not just
intelligence, and we are not just citizens: we are all that, and more.
The study of human beings as citizens, which is the objective of this book,
should not be done in an isolated manner, detached from all the other factors that are
part of us. Human life cannot be split into segments of perspectives. The segment of
an orange is not an orange, it is only part of it; it is an orange when it has all its
segments. The same happens with personal life; it cannot be broken into several pieces
where just one part, one dimension is studied.
Hence the term integral dimension.
2Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 1
4 ESO Educacin ticocvica
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
2/50
Contents
1. We are Heirs: Genes and Culture
Origins and Originalities
The human being is a strange reality, the result of the interaction of several realities.
Firstly, we have a body, or maybe we should say that we are a body, and this body we are/have
is the result of the biological evolution of our species, and also of our own evolution, and thatis why it is very important to look after it. But we are not only biological beings. To a large extent,
we are made of culture and of the society in which we live. We are also the result of cultural
influences.
Each of us is heir to a biological trajectory and some cultural influences. The human
being is the result of the interaction between genetics and culture, of both things at the same
time. Our origins consist of genes and culture, the internal and external aspects. But we are not
only the result of this interaction; we are not just a product; we also do things and create
ourselves. Thus, in the same way that we say that we have an origin, we must also say that we
have originalities.
4Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 1
A Great Debate: Nature or Culture?
Hundreds of erudite books and scientific magazines have dealt with the conflict
between nature and culture. This debate is not far detached from our daily life and we must have
heard of, or even discussed it, but perhaps in other ways. On the one hand, we have heard
someone saying hundreds of times, He is like his parents!, Genes always show up in the
end!, The most important thing is biological nature. On the other hand, we have also heard
That comes from experience, There is no such thing as nature, just history and culture. This
can also be debated using the example of twins: think of two genetically equal twins, with the
same socio-cultural factors. Would they be equal? No, because each one is the way he is,
with his own personality. And where does this personality come from? Genetics? Education?
These are the terms of the debate. Present-day science usually gives a complex view.
We are culture, but not just culture. We are also biology, but not just biology. We are bio-cultural
beings.
REMEMBER: This debate, from either point of view, tends to clear the individual of anyresponsibility, because those saying that we are the result of genetics defend that there is
nothing we can do, and so do those stating that we are the result of education. Both arguments
conceal what we are: complex beings, the result of biology and culture, but also people who
decide and act, people who change their own and others' lives.
Human being: each one of usORIGINS ORIGINALITIES
Nature (biology, genetics)
+
Culture (society)
- what we do, say
* the fruit of our: freedom and responsibility
ACTIVITIES:
1. Which of the following do you think is the most appropriate word to define what we are? (Look it upin the dictionary and give your reasons: human being, person, individual, man, conscience,citizen.
2. Choose one of these options: Are we the result of our inheritance (nature) or of our life circle (society,
culture)? Or both? Or none of them? Give your reasons.3. Think about a situation in which you turn to nature or culture to justify something you have done butdo not want to admit to.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
3/50
2. We Are Many Things: A Plural Identity
As we have seen, there are many terms that define human life, many dimensions, and
when we threaten it, when we threaten a person's dignity, we reduce it to just one dimension
and deny diversity.
If the human being is plural and diverse, the way in which we approach him or her
should also be different. Many times, we try to explain it from only one point of view, like when
we try to define an object by just observing one of its sides.
Bearing in mind all of the previous ideas, and in order to simplify this difficult matter a
little, we could say that there are four main dimensions to the human being and, consequently,
four perspectives, four different ways of explaining what he is, what we are.
The human being can be seen from four perspectives: from above, from inside,
from outside and from below.
1) From above: the spiritual, religious or transcendental part of the person; according to this
perspective, the human being is willing to transcend;
2) From outside: the socio-cultural dimension or "citizenship"; the human being is defined
as a social being by his relationships and sense of belonging;
3) From inside: this perspective
concentrates on the
deepest part of the person,
the personality itself, and
tries to ignore the external
part: the human being is a
psychological, emotional
and internal being.
4) From below: the physical or
biological perspectives
(genes); the human being
is an element of nature, a
biological species, another
living creature.
These four dimensions are correct but separate. In a complicated way, we are all of
them. Nowadays, many of the ideas on this matter reduce human richness to one unique
dimension; this is a mistake.
5Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 1
ACTIVITIES:
1. Human life occurs within these four dimensions. All human activity may be seen from the perspectiveof these four dimensions. According to this statement, how could we define friendship from eachperspective?
2. Which do you think is the most important dimension? Why? Are basic dimensions and importantdimensions synonyms?
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
4/50
3. Creating our Biography
Biology and Biography
Human beings not only have a fundamental biology, but also a biography. We could
say that biology is what we have, while biography is what we do with the resources we have,
from biological to cultural factors. Human life, each life, is not made; each person has to build
his life, hence the importance of thinking about these matters. Being a citizen means being a
person, but we cannot be a person without an identity. Strangely enough, one needs the other,
in other words, we also need other people to achieve a personal identity. This is why this matter
is so important and transcendental.
To write our biography we need three major elements:
- what we are, our qualities, our aptitudes and abilities
- what we aim to be, our life project, our vocation
- our circumstances
We all have some resources and possibilities, and this is why we - helped by education
- have to discover our abilities; they might be related to sport, they might be artistic abilities, or
a capacity for scientific investigation, among others. Thus, it is important to know ourselves
and value what we have. But it is also important to know what we want to be, in other wordshow we are going to use our abilities: to know our vocation, what attracts my attention, what my
calling is. It is also important to be aware of ones physical and social circumstances.
If some of these factors fail, feelings of frustration and unhappiness arise.
6Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 1
Like a Novel
Human life, our biography, could be compared to a novel. Novels have a plot and
suspense, just like our own lives. We create the plot from our experiences and from the
characters we come across. Our life makes sense when we tell it, when we narrate our
experiences. We like telling people about our life and listening to others talk about theirs. We
like stories, tales, adventure films; we like to identify ourselves with their characters and heroes.
We also have to create a character in our life, so we must think a lot and choose the character
we want to play, the story we want to tell about ourselves. Therefore, we must pay attention to
our life, our wishes, our motivations, and to others.
BIOGRAPHY
Abilities
+
Vocation
+Circumstance
ACTIVITIES:
1. Of the three factors that make up
biography, which do you think is the most
important? Why?2. Look for the biography of an important
person like Velzquez. How are these
three factors expressed through his life?
3. If you had to write your biography or CV,
what would you say? How would you
organise it? What are your abilities,
vocation and circumstances?
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
5/50
4. Motivation, Autonomy and Health
Being Autonomous
Writing our biography is a way of being autonomous. An autonomous person is
someone who decides for himself, who makes his own rules. Meanwhile a heteronomous
person is someone who lives through others and not through himself. Of course, being
autonomous does not mean living without counting on others; an autonomous person counts
on others, listens, takes advice and knowledge from others. Autonomy is not the same as
independence; it's about making your own decisions, but not in opposition to others.To be an autonomous person we need to organise our wishes, our motivations or, as
was said before, our vocation. What do we want in life? What do we value? What do we want
to achieve?
Human Motivation
The psychologist A. Maslow designed a pyramid of human motivation that became
famous. This pyramid organises human wishes, from the most basic to the most important. It
is also an organization of human needs. Lets look at this pyramid.
7Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 1
Biography and Health
Building our life means taking care of all that we are. This
involves looking after our biography (the importance of reflection,
criticism, etc), but also our biology. As human beings, we need to help
each other and comply with some rules. This does not mean an end to
our freedom, rather it is the path to total freedom, to be able to develop
our biography and climb the steps of the pyramid. We can help others
by taking care of ourselves, because, in a very basic way, this is part of
mixing with other people. This can be reflected in terms of personal
hygiene or respect for others; when a colleague is speaking, forinstance, we wait our turn to speak. Good personal hygiene is also
essential when mixing with others.
ACTIVITIES:
1. Look up in the dictionary the following
terms: self-fulfilment, self-esteem,
social acceptance.
2. Everything we do, or almost everything,
can be found within this pyramid. Try to
think of an example of each step from
your own experience.
3. How would you explain that a personremains on one of the first steps and
doesnt aim higher?
4. What relationship could be established
between this image and the dimensions
of human life?
5. Who do you think is a happy person?
What does happiness mean?
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
6/50
Introduction
In order to be aware of what is at stake when talking about citizenship, it is
important to know the origin of this word. We use the term citizenship in order to
describe the condition of being a citizen, that is, the person who lives with other people
and shares common spaces with them. Although its etymological origin relates this
word to civitas (city), it is not applied to the people who live in a city in order to
differentiate them from the ones who live outside of the city - in the country, or outside
of the city. We are not describing a geographical space, rather an ethical, political and
cultural one, a space where rights, obligations and values are found. This is a common
space among human beings, a very special biological species that has always been
described as an intermediate species between animals and gods throughout the history
of civilisation. This intermediate condition turns the human being into a vulnerable and
dependent animal and that is why we can say that man is a social animal.
In order to satisfy his necessities, the human being depends on others; he is not
fulfilled by himself alone. This idea becomes even clearer if we have a look through thefirst and the last years of human life. Necessities are fulfilled through actions. For
instance, the need to eat makes us look for food, we work in order to get it, we learn
how to prepare it in a healthy way or even organise the day according to the different
meals.
Life in the ethical, political and cultural space that we call citizenship is not a
result of the sum of actions carried out by all the individuals who want to satisfy their
needs. Not everyone does everything at the same time. Rather than a sum of actions,
society is an interaction of actions whose aim is to fulfil common needs. This interaction
has been described using many metaphors: a mosaic, a puzzle, a net, an organism, amachine, etc. In every case there is always productive interaction between two
important elements: person and community, fraction and totality, individual and city. The
ethical, political and cultural space is a result of that interaction. For instance, the values,
rules and symbols that rule the different spaces where our daily life is developed
family, neighbourhood, school, friends come as a result of interaction, that is, actions
from people who count on others. This counting on others is the basis of citizenship.
The following could be the formula for coexistence:
Coexistence = feeling + arguing + acting
From this interaction, society is born as a space where some people count on
others. However, citizenship exists when we count on others in order to coexist.
Citizenship describes a project of coexistence because there is a common life plan that
is not just limited by biological survival (surviving on other species) neither by plain
zoological coexistence (the coexistence of other species). There is a plan of
coexistence where the coordination of goals, aims and means is established. In other
words, coexistence exists when we count on others when feeling, arguing and acting.
2Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 2
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
7/50
Contents
1. Keys to Creating Our Citizenship
In the same way that none of us were born knowing what physics or chemistry were,
so none of us were born knowing how to coexist. Coexistence requires a learning period and
that is why we say that citizenship requires learning. It is not a matter of learning values, rules
or symbols, but learning how to count on others within that common space. There are a coupleof key elements that could help us to build this citizenship.
Learning to differentiate between the groups we belong to and fit into. Social
Philosophy has always differentiated between primary and secondary groups. For the first
group, they use the word community and for the second one they use the word association. The
table below could help us to specify the meaning:
4Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 2
Citizenship cannot be built without the primary groups conviction and the secondary
groups cooperation.
Second key element:We should know the history of
values, rules and symbols. The interaction thatmakes citizenship possible is the result of a
coexistence produced throughout time. The
history of the idea of citizenship can teach us
that there is always some tension among
natural and artificial elements. For example,
our parents nationality, the place where we
were born or the institutions we have been
integrated into without being asked our opinion
(our name, the registry, childhood habits).
They are all natural elements in conflict and
interaction with our will or personal life plan. In
that way, citizenship in the ancient world
was more focused on citizenships natural
condition than on consent. Meanwhile,
consent, meaning peoples free will, is the
most important thing in the modern world.
Even if we are born in a certain country and
have the legal condition of belonging to that
country, we may not identify ourselves with
that country and want to change citizenship
because we are not convinced by its values,
rules or symbols.
Primary GroupsCommunity
Secondary GroupsAssociation
Based on natural links, on shared feelings.
The relationship is spontaneous and personal,
based on values
Family, Clan, Tribe, etc.
Based on interest and rational calculation
The relationship is impersonal and formal,
based on rules, regulations and laws
Schools, Companies, Hospital, etc.
ACTIVITIES:
1. Search for some everyday expressions
containing the words listed below and classifythem depending on their relationship withcitizens.
Urbanity, from Latin urbanitas,-atis, it meanscourteousness, courtesy, attention and goodmanners.Civility, from Latin civilitas, -atis, it meanssociability and urbanity.Civic-mindedness, a term originating in Francethat has two meanings, (1) zeal for one'shomeland, institutions and interests, (2) respect
by the citizen of the rules of public coexistence.Manners, term with different meanings (1) Theway something is executed or occurred; (2)Someones bearing and manners, (3) Skill,ability, cunning; (4) Peoples quality or class.Legality, (1) Prescribed by law and in line with it,2. adj. Belonging or related to law. 3. adj. True,precise, loyal and straight when carrying outone's positions functions.4. adj. Loyal or formalin one's behaviour.Rough: Rude, unpolished, uncultured, withoutdoctrine or teaching.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
8/50
2. Organising Citizens: Institutions and Participation
Social Rules: From Interaction to InstitutionSocial interaction is not produced spontaneously, rather it happens in a culturally and
socially regulated way. This regulation is complex and fills the ethical, political and cultural
space with rules, regulations, symbols and values. In the same way that we need to learn the
traffic rules if we want to drive a car, we also have to learn citizenship's rules if we want to drive
through it. Not all of the rules are the same nor are they equally important.
Rules do not appear by magic, rather they are the result of repeated interaction that
has been recognised. When this happens, interaction creates an institution. For instance, if
someone has a specified skill and it is recognised by others, the rest of society accepts that that
person deals with that task and accepts him as having that function or playing that role.
Sports are a good example, because there are some rules whose existence we have to accept
in order to count on others. Without those rules, sports would not have any sense or value.
Through sports we check that rules constitute the activity of playing: chess, football, basketball,
etc. The game is based on the players participation and skills, but also on the rules they are
submitted to. It also happens in society: there is no game (citizenship) if there are no players
(citizens); and at the same time there is no coexistence (participation) if there are no games
(social institutions).
Socialisation, Participation and RepresentationThe process through which people are integrated into a society is called socialisation.
Through the citizenship terms of social, political and cultural life, social integration is a process
through which we learn roles or functions in which the rules of citizenship are visible. Let's use
the theatre metaphor to better understand it. Social life is like a play where there are some
roles. The people playing the roles are no longer individuals, they are characters. The plot
stops being a written script and becomes action. The distribution of time and the knowledge
of roles generate a series of rules that everybody has to respect for the play to be successful.
If the actors do not play the role they have been assigned, they will not be integrated and the
play might fail. If the people who make up society only think about themselves while coexistingwith others, social disintegration will take place and we will find socials atoms instead of
citizens.
Primary socialisation has its origin in the family and that is why family life is the first
common social space through which we access the group of social institutions. The first time
citizenship is learned happens in the family and it will be developed through other experiences
in educational, professional, religious, cultural and political institutions. For integration to be
complete, people have to learn to participate. If there is no participation, there will be no
integration. There are spaces in social life where integration is only possible thanks to direct
participation by those affected. There are also spaces where participation is carried out by
representatives.
5Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 2
Types anddimensions ofCitizenshipPolitical
Social
Economical
Civic
Intercultural
Membership, participation and integration into the different spheresof human life
PoliticalRelated to political institutions such as parties, unions and proxies
Related to social institutions such as neighbourhood, educational and health
associations.
Related to economic institutions such as companies, the stock market and
consumption.
Related to civic institutions such as trade associations, maritime guilds or
professions.
Related to cultural, recreational, charitable and religious traditions.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
9/50
3. A Royal Family
There are many examples of family that we can come up with. A good example, well
known by everyone would be the Spanish Royal Family. The Spanish Royal Family is very
important, but it is formed like most families: a generation, values (love, devotion, etc...),
dedications, activities, etc.
6Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 2
ACTIVITIES:
1. Visit the webpage of the Spanish Royal
Household and make a table containing
all the members of the Royal Household.Describe them briefly, add some
information and, above all, find out what
kind of work they have been assigned
(their occupations).
2. Your family is another example, the one
you have closest. Make a table the more
complete, the better containing, as with
the Royal one, all its members. They also
deserve a description and write down
their occupations (what kind of work, what
they studied...)
CONSTITUCIN ESPAOLA
Artculo 56. 1. El Rey es el Jefe delEstado, smbolo de su unidad y
permanencia, arbitra y modera elfuncionamiento regular de las instituciones,
asume la ms alta representacin del
Estado Espaol en las relaciones
internacionales, especialmente con las
naciones de su comunidad histrica, y
ejerce las funciones que le atribuyen
expresamente la Constitucin y las Leyes.
2. Su ttulo es el de Rey de Espaa y podr
utilizar los dems que correspondan a la
Corona.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
10/50
4. Out into the World, Loaded with Values
As we are seeing, human life is a relationship, and human relationships are not moved
just by biological and physical forces, but also by values. A value is a thing we appreciate, an
important thing for us, the reason why we do things. Values are usually expressed with abstract
words such as solidarity, freedom, comradeship, but they are fed by concrete actions, by
little actions that give them meaning. Values mark our relationships with others and with
ourselves. Carefully look at the table of values below. These values are reflected in attitudes
and actions that we all can adopt.
7Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 2
ACTIVITIES:
1. Here you have a list of values. You can surely think of some more. Focus on thevalues related to family, friends and neighbours. Complete the following table inyour notebook (adding some more values):
VALUESDEFINITION(dictionary)
I THINK IT ISIMPORTANTBECAUSE
AN ACTION WHERE ITIS PRESENT,and thatI can undertake IS
respect
sincerity
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
11/50
Introduction
To talk about citizenship automatically suggests talking about coexistence. We
have already seen the complexity of human life in the previous units; to set out the
citizenship issue cannot be undertaken of the entire person. And a person is basically
communication, society, and being present with and for others. The human being is, as
the ancient Greeks once said, a social animal.
Referring to society is not making an allusion to something unknown. In the
previous unit we already learnt that the fundamental constitution of society is family,
friends, neighbours, etc. Therefore, society is the group of relationships within which we
move, which allow us to develop and live, even though they may, at times, cause us
difficulties.
We can live in society thanks to the effort of all of its members. Each of us has
a function in society, and we are able to live, and even enjoy, thanks to society and its
social, political and cultural institutions. Society works thanks to rules or laws; they are
not merely tools of oppression, punishment or sanction. Thanks to rules we can domany things, thanks to rules we can be free as rules give us possibilities. Rules (or
laws) can be compared with paths in the jungle; it could be said that it is annoying that
one should go along these previously drawn paths, that they are inhibiting us, but if it
werent for those paths we would not be able to reach the other side or move inside the
jungle. To live our lives immediately suggests that we use the paths and rules that are
given to us and that we give ourselves. Imagine what might happen if every day when
we woke up we had to invent the rules that might be useful for that day (from the most
elementary to the most complex)! Surely we would waste a lot of time (and we wouldn't
get anything done), and even moreso if we imagined that the next day we would have
to invent them all over again. Therefore, it is useful, good and very healthy to use therules or paths that are at our disposal. And this does not stop us from questioning some
rules, as nothing guarantees that a path is always valid or that there are no alternative
paths.
On the other hand, human coexistence is not always harmonious or friendly.
There are times when conflict arises. It also happens that there are persons who, by
using the freedom and the possibilities that coexistence offers, act for their own benefit
or interest. They are people who want to impose their point of view and their lifestyle.
Imagine, for example, a thief who steals money from a person, or a terrorist group that
wants to impose its criteria on the majority by using weapons and violence. This is
precisely why the existence of rules and laws is necessary, as they do not only attack
this selfish, unsupportive or violent behaviour, but also, and more importantly, they
guarantee everybody's freedom. This is precisely the function of law: to guarantee
everyone's freedom. The lives of citizens cannot do without rules. We can call this the
normative dimension of civic responsibility.
2Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 3
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
12/50
Contents
1. The Organisation of Freedom: Conflict and Cooperation
From Freedom to Freedoms
In the social organisation of human interaction, the Law plays an important role. When
Law is studied it is always divided into two parts, on one hand private law, which groups the
subjects related to citizens' private lives as well as family relationships, property, agreementsand the acquisition of citizenship. On the other hand, public law groups subjects related to
citizens' public life, such as participation in public activities, the election of individuals to public
office, the management of public assets and in general, the regulation of common activities.
These two parts of the Law are only understood when there is a general reflection about the
meaning of laws and justice, that is to say, when there is an ethical reflection that provides
arguments on issuing the best laws, organising them in the best way within the different codes
and applying them most justly. Within this overall reflection about general interests, the common
good or common standards, there is a central idea around which all the others revolve: the
harmonising of individual freedom with the freedom of other individuals. Therefore, learning
about citizenship can be defined as learning about everybodys freedom, not only that of one
individual but of a group of individuals. Without this harmonising of freedoms there are onlyindividuals and no citizens.
On top of this reflection on the freedom of all people, the Law distinguishes between
"freedom" in general and "freedoms". And it deals with "public freedoms" when analysing,
regulating and encouraging the public dimension of personal freedom. For example, the first
things that dictatorships and tyrannies do is annul the most basic "public freedoms", such as
freedom of conscience, thought, freedom of speech, the right to protest, and freedom of
association and participation. Exercising citizenship is to promote and defend these public
liberties, within the double meaning of the liberties of all people and the liberties of all
dimensions of human life.
Regulating Conflict and Social CooperationThe interaction of liberties is carried out through a double movement, on the one hand
through disintegration, separation and confrontation, what we might call conflict dynamics. On
the other hand, through the movement of integration, unification and cooperation, we have what
we might call cooperation dynamics. Both movements have positive and negative aspects. The
Law adopts these dynamics as regular so that higher standards of liberty, justice, equality and
pluralism might be socially applied. The following table shows us this double possibility:
4Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 3
Positive aspects Negative aspects
Conflictdynamics
Cooperation
dynamics
- Outrage and rebellion in the face of
unjust situations.- Individuality and critical capacities of
citizens.
- Social change and dynamism.
- Coordination of individual actions.
- Integration of differences into common
projects.
- Achieving of common purposes and
aims.
-Disorder and breaking of rules,
regulations and laws.- Sacrifice and heroic behaviour not
considered by laws.
- Personal suffering and pain caused by
fighting and confrontation.
- Risk of the levelling out of
responsibilities.
- Complacency with mistakes.
- Projects are always carried out in
groups.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
13/50
2. Authority, Legality and Legitimacy
From Power to Powers
Learning about citizenship does not only consist of learning about how political
power functions. Although it is necessary for us to analyse the close relationships
between political power and citizenship, it is important that we extend the reflection on
citizenship to other spheres of power. In this way, citizenship is not only exercised in theface of political power but also in the face of any despotic, tyrannical or abusive show
of power. It is important to extend the reflection on power to other fields of daily life, such
as the financial, professional, civil, family or educational aspects, where we often
confuse power with other qualities that are necessary for the organisation of these
activities. This way, we can at least distinguish the following types of powers:
POWER-COERCION (force); capacity to make someone do something by force.
POWER-CONTROL (power); capacity to convince without forcing someone's will.
POWER-AUTHORITY (exemplary); capacity to convince by guiding someone's
will through example. POWER-LEGALITY (democracy); capacity to convince and make someone
comply with the laws, harmonising the liberty of all by seeking the common good.
From Authoritarianism to Authority
In closed societies, the greatest risk in terms of the use of power in all its guises
is authoritarianism, that is to say, to abuse the authority that one has. Sometimes, in
sports teams the behaviour of captains or coaches is authoritarian, they abuse the
power they are given or the trust deposited in them in order to promote their own
interests instead of general or common interests.
Active citizenship is one of the best ways of ending any sort of authoritarian
behaviour because it promotes the capacity to criticise, participation and joint
responsibility in the exercising of freedom. In fact, active citizenship helps us to
distinguish, in all elements of life, between power (and its forms) and authority (and its
perverted form of authoritarianism).
Ways of Recognising Authority: Legality and Legitimacy
Even though power and powers arise from the interaction of liberties, we, the
citizens do not accept just any sort of power or authority. We demand that powers and
authorities have an ethical, political and cultural foundation or basis. This basis or
foundation is called legitimacy. According to Max Weber, legality is one of the ways oflegitimising political power and it has become the most accepted way of breaking away
from all sorts of authoritarianism, thus promoting spaces for democratic citizenship.
5Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 3
TYPES OF LEGITIMACY FOR POLITICAL
POWER ACCORDING TO MAX WEBER
Traditional legitimacy
Charismatic legitimacy
Legitimacy based on constitutional legality
Characterised by:
Tradition is the source or basis for power; doing things as they
have always been done.
Personal charisma is the source or basis for power: because of
his charisma or personal qualities.
The rule of law, laws or the constitution are the source or basisfor power: in line with the law.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
14/50
3. The Promotion of Justice: Rights and Responsibilities
The Law: Between Law and Rights
Learning about citizenship is directly related to the learning of laws. This does
not mean that those who know all the laws by heart are better citizens than those who
do not know them. We mean that active participation in a social and political
organisation is supported by or based on (legitimised by) an ordered set of laws. This
systematised and ordered set of laws receives the name of Law. Unlike the socialhabits, customs or right or wrong forms of social behaviour, this is about written rules,
structured and organized according to the subject they regulate. For example, the
highway or traffic code gathers in a written, structured and organised manner the laws
that regulate driving. In the same way civil or criminal codes bring together the laws
that regulate property or crimes against a person's life.
Law is also referred to in terms of the right to make a claim for a just cause, for
example when we say "I have the right to X, as if it says: it is justice that I am granted
X". In this sense, the term rights describes the pretensions of justice that people or
citizens claim before legally constituted authorities.
Justice: Between Responsibility and Responsibilities
Learning about citizenship is also directly related to learning about
responsibilities. In the same way that we cannot separate heads from tails on coins,
neither can we separate rights from responsibilities. Any claim of a just cause entails a
responsibility exercised by the person who carries it out. If some neighbours demand
sports facilities for their neighbourhood because they have the right, they have to do it
in a responsible manner, that is to say, using the adequate methods, attending to the
corresponding institutions and, above all, taking joint responsibility for the claim. That
is why we speak about responsibilities in plural, as, apart from legal responsibilities,
there are others, which can be social, cultural or civil.
6Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 3
ACTIVITY: Good citizens or well-behaved citizens?
At the end of the 18th century the philosopher Immanuel Kant was posed an
important problem related to citizenship. What is the relationship between a good person and
a good citizen? Is it necessary to be a good person (in moral terms) in order to be a good
citizen (in legal terms)? Kant was so convinced about the value and importance of citizenship
that he asserted that even a town of intelligent devils would be interested in coexistenceamong citizens.
Man is obliged to be a good citizen although he is not obliged to be a morally good
man. The establishing of a state has a solution, even for a town of devils, as surprising as it
might sound, whenever they are intelligent, and the problem can be formulated as follows:
Organising a crowd of rational human beings who, for their conservation, jointly demand
universal laws, even when each one tends internally to evade the law means establishing a
own constitution so that, although their particular feelings are the opposite, they please both,
so that the result of their public behaviour would be the same as if they did not have such
inclinations. (Kant, Perpetual Peace, Tecnos, Madrid).
- Do you agree with Kant? Can a good person be a bad citizen? Can a good citizen
be bad person? Find reasons for your answer.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
15/50
4. LEARNING CITIZENSHIP THROUGH COEXISTENCE AT SCHOOL
The Most Familiar Spaces for the Participation of CitizensBesides learning about rights and responsibilities, learning about citizenship is
learning about feelings. Even though they appear in writing in a code or document,rights and responsibilities are not part of a lesson of civic responsibility that we have tolearn by heart. They are part of a lesson of civic responsibility that has to be performed
during our daily lives and, above all, in those spaces where we usually exercise ourfreedom.We do not study the constitution or human rights in order to know them by heart,
rather we study them in order to be better citizens. This means that citizenship has avital and practical dimension that is a task, a training programme, and an exercise. Inthe same way as before playing a game or carrying out a sporting activity we have toperform warm-up exercises to be in shape and give the best of ourselves to the team,so we have to understand and train in the rights and responsibilities of our most familiarspaces.
The School: A Space with Rights and Responsibilities
In order to perform this warm-up it might be interesting to know the rules thatgovern coexistence in the schools to which we belong and in which we participate. Let'sremind ourselves of this dynamic of rights and responsibilities through the followingtable from which we have taken some articles:
7Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 3
ACTIVITIES:
1. Observe how the rules and regulations of your school are organised. Analyse the
number of articles, titles and sections of these rules and regulations and observe
the progression and development being used.
2. Read the rights and obligations that we give you here as an example throughly.Summarise them in your own words. What are the standards that are underlined
and defended?
De los derechos de los alumnos y alumnas
Art. 15. Derecho a una formacin integral.
1. Todos los alumnos y las alumnas tienen derecho a
recibir una formacin integral que contribuya al
pleno desarrollo de su personalidad.
2. Para hacer efectivo este derecho, la educacin delos alumnos y las alumnas incluir:
a) la formacin en valores y principios recogidos en la
normativa internacional, Constitucin Espaola y enlEstatut dAutonomia de la Comunitat Valenciana.
b) La consecucin de hbitos intelectuales y sociales,
y estrategias de trabajo, as como de los necesarios
conocimientos cientficos, tcnicos, humansticos,histricos y de uso de las tecnologas de la
informacin y de la comunicacin.
c) La formacin integral de la persona y el
conocimiento de su entorno social y cultural
inmediato y, en especial, de la lengua, historia,
geografa, cultura y realidad de la sociedad actual
[]3. Los alumnos y las alumnas tienen derecho a que sus
padres, madres, tutores o tutoras velen por su
formacin integral, colaborando para ello con lacomunidad educativa, especialmente en el
cumplimiento de las normas de convivencia y de las
medidas establecidas en los centros docentes para
favorecer el esfuerzo y el estudio.
De los deberes del alumnado
Art. 24. Deber de estudio y de asistencia a clase.
1. El estudio es un deber bsico de los alumnos y las
alumnas, que comporta el desarrollo y aprovecha-
miento de sus aptitudes personales y de los
conocimientos que se impartan.2. La finalidad del deber al estudio es que, por medio
del aprendizaje efectivo de las distintas materias que
componen los currculos, los alumnos y las alumnasadquieran una formacin integral que les permita
alcanzar el mximo rendimiento acadmico, el pleno
desarrollo de su personalidad, la adquisicin de
hbitos intelectuales y tcnicas de trabajo, la prepa-racin para participar en la vida social y cultural, y la
capacitacin para el ejercicio de actividades profe-
sionales.
3. Este deber bsico, que requiere del esfuerzo, de la
disciplina y de la responsabilidad por parte de los
alumnos y las alumnas, se concreta en las siguien-
tes obligaciones:a) actitud activa, participativa y atenta en clase,
b) Participar en actividades formativas
c) Asistir con material y equipamiento necesariod) Realizar las tareas encomendadas por los profesores
[]
f) Respetar el ejercicio del derecho y el deber del estu-
dio de los dems []
Decreto 39/2008 del Consell de la Generalitat Valenciana
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
16/50
Introduction
The exercising of our citizenship is always done in a historical context that is always
evolving and changing. Therefore it is important to approach the exercising of citizenship from
a historical point of view. That means, knowing that our pretentions to citizenship are not the
first and will not be the last.
In recent decades, moral philosophy and politics have not approached citizenship only
in legal terms, as if the practise of the citizenship was only reduced to the relation between the
people and the legal systems or legislation itself. Nowadays, as well as speaking of legal
citizenship, we use terms such as social, cultural, economic and even intercultural citizenship.
In order to refer to all of these things as part of peoples' democratic life we shall speak of
"democratic citizenship".
In this unit we will look at how the concept of citizenship has changed, and to what
extent it has been related, from the very beginning, to political organisation. Sometimes we
refer to political organisation in terms of government (polis, republic) and this is the reason why
it is important to understand the relationship between citizenship and types of states. Nowadayswe only speak of true citizenship when there is a state ruled by laws, values and human rights.
We also describe political organisations as democracy, describing not only the forms of
government, but also a form of participating in public matters, of identifying with a political
community and promoting a worthwhile existence for all human beings.
One of the most important institutions in the development of democratic citizenship is
the Public Administration. It is a part of an executive power, not only in a national sense, but also
in the context of an autonomous region and in a local sense. Nowadays, democratic citizenship
is not only practised on a national level. On the one hand it is open to a cosmopolitan
citizenship, where the people in a country consider themselves as citizens of the world; for
example the way people in Spain are citizens of the European Union. On the other hand,democratic citizenship is open to an environment of proximity in which local and autonomous
powers participate. In Spain, the city halls and autonomous regions are institutions that
administer increasingly more public services every day. This idea of service has developed
historically as the ideas of separation of powers and social justice have become part of citizens'
democratic convictions.
2Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 4
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
17/50
Contents
1. The Historic Conquest of Citizenship
Athens and Ancient Citizenship
The concept of citizenship appeared in Greece in the 5th and 4th centuries before
Christ. It describes the way free individuals, who because of their condition could take
responsibility for the dealing with public matters, participated in city life. These cities wereactually medium-sized towns called polis. This term refers to a city-state, which means, not
only the union of citizens but also the way in which they were organised. Not everyone had the
condition of citizen (polits), because women, children and slaves were not considered capableof taking on the responsibility of running the city. The ones who had the condition of citizens
were obliged to participate in the running of the city, holding positions in equality and changing
positions from time to time.
Rome and the Limits of Laws
Another important moment in the history of citizenship came with the expansion of the
Roman Empire. Rome developed the Greek idea of citizenship and spread it throughout the
Mediterranean. Roman Law developed the procedures for taking part in the life of the Republicand obtaining citizenship. To be a citizen of Rome was a privilege and honour people from other
places could achieve if they obeyed the laws of the Empire or the Republic. From the first
century before Christ to the third after Christ, the concept of citizenship changed, not only
because it spread throughout the Mediterranean, but because it raised a very important
problem: could only those who obeyed Roman laws be citizens? Was it possible to have another
law, another Republic and another way of being a citizen?
Stoic philosophers like Seneca and Cicero set out an interesting transformation of the concept
of the citizen and extended it to individuals capable of submitting to the laws of reason, as if the
city in which they had to live was not a real city as had been seen up until then, but rather a
virtual city in which all human beings could participate.
National Citizenship, Modern Citizenship
This tension between the real citizenship imposed by Rome and the virtual citizenship
in which one took part only by using reason and considering himself to be part of the world,
would mark the birth of the modern concept of citizenship. Apart from this tension between
written and unwritten laws, from the 6th century onwards, the concept of citizenship would be
directly related to the new ways of understanding the Republic which, from then on, would
receive the name of nation. Citizenship became national and was limited by the state of
belonging to a territory, by the link to a sovereign power and by the achievement of certain
benefits in exchange for certain responsibilities. With the appearance of modern nations,
sovereignty was the responsibility of the nation as a whole (national sovereignty) or of the
people defined as a group formed by all individuals (popular sovereignty).
4Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 4
ACTIVITIES:
1. Create a little history of the idea of citizenship:
Citizenship in
was characterised by..
ATHENS ROME MODERN
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
18/50
2. Citizenship and the Rule of Law
From the State of Nature to the Rule of Law
From the 17th century onwards a concept of citizenship was consolidated that has
lasted until today. It is a citizenship we can call legal because it is related to the capacity to
submit to laws or the Law and transform both laws and the Law. This double movement of
observance and transformation of laws defines the concept of modern citizenship.
To describe this double movement political philosophers thought it was important todifferentiate between two ways of understanding the organisation of social and political life. On
one hand, there is the primitive and gregarious form in which individuals are all in conflict
because they consider each other as wolves (homo homini lupus). This form is called the state
of nature and is not the state of civilised and intelligent people. On the other hand, there is an
evolved and educated form in which individuals cooperate and are capable of giving way in
their ambitions so that everyone can be a part of the project of the city. This form receives the
name of rule of law, because the relation between laws and the Law is a criterion to measure
the level of civilisation. The state of nature (barbarity) is in complete opposition to the rule of law
(civilisation).
The Rule of Law and the Social ContractThis leap from barbarity to civilisation happens when individuals are capable of
submitting to the rules of a contract. The citizen is the person who is ready to make this leap
and assume the consequences. The rules, norms, laws and values that are treated in this
contract form a rule of law.
Citizenship according to Two Modern Philosophers: Locke and Rousseau
5Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 4
ACTIVITIES:
1. Define the following expressions: State of nature, rule of law, social contract.
2. Read Locke and Rosseau's texts carefully. What stands out in each of them? How do they
understand political association (contract)?
J. Locke
Essay on Civil Government
Being men free, equal and independent by
nature, none of them can be withdrawn from
this situation and submitted to political power
with his consent. This is given by an
agreement celebrated with others to meet
and integrate in a community destined to offer
them a good, safe and peaceful life together.
Two Treaties of Government
J. J. Rousseau
The Social Contract
This act of association creates a moral and
collective body, composed of as many
members as the assembly contains votes,
and receiving from this act its unity, its
common identity, its life and its will. This
public person, so formed by the union of all
other persons formerly took the name of city,
and now takes that ofRepublicorbody politic;
it is called by its members State when
passive, Sovereign when active, and Power
when compared with others like itself. Those
who are associated in it take collectively the
name of people, and several are calledcitizens, as sharing in the sovereign power,
and subjects, as being under the laws of the
State.
The Social Contract. Or Principles of Political
Right
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
19/50
3. From Liberal State to Social State
The Liberal Rule of Law
After the liberal revolutions of the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries, the rule of law was
called liberal rule of law. This form of political organisation made individual freedoms the centre
of democratic citizenship. These are the true freedoms, because public powers have the
obligation to guarantee, consolidate and strengthen these individual freedoms as the basis of
democratic citizenship.
Social State and Welfare State
After the socialist revolutions of the 19th and 20th centuries, the rule of law was called
social rule of law. This form of political organisation makes social conditions, material
necessities and economic resources the centre of democratic citizenship. So that fundamental
rights were not just formal rights or rights only recognized on a paper, the defenders of the
social state proposed equality as the centre of democratic citizenship. The social state did not
promote equality of results but it did present equality of opportunities, so that the less capable
citizens could participate as equals in public life. This concern for equality produced some new
rights called social rights. Among these we can find the right to education, healthcare and
cultural training. The social state not only protected citizens, it also trained them and promoted
them in order to encourage their welfare. This is why we can say that we have passed from asocial state to a welfare state.
Social and Democratic Rule of Law
The Spanish Constitution was one of the last European constitutions of the 20th
century. When it was written it adopted aspects of the liberal and social state. This summary of
political traditions is one of the biggest efforts of the constitution because liberal- and socialist-
inspired traditions can rule from it. A summary that does not refer to the existence of rights and
laws but to the recognition of values that are not the property of any political or ideological
tradition therefore receive the name of higher values.
6Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 4
Artculo 1 de la Constitucin Espaola
1. Espaa se constituye en un Estado social
y democrtico de Derecho, que propugna
como valores superiores de su
ordenamiento jurdico la libertad, la justicia,
la igualdad y el pluralismo poltico.
2. La soberana nacional reside en el pueblo
espaol, del que emanan los poderes del
Estado.
3. La forma poltica del Estado espaol es la
Monarqua parlamentaria.
Artculo 10 de lEstatut dAutonomia de la
Comunitat Valenciana
1. La Generalitat defender y promover los
derechos sociales de los valencianos que
representan un mbito inseparable del
respeto de los valores y derechos
universales de las personas y que
constituyen uno de los fundamentos cvicos
del progreso econmico, cultural y
tecnolgico de la Comunitat Valenciana. []
4. La Generalitat, en el marco de sus
competencias y mediante su organizacin
jurdica, promover las condiciones
necesarias para que los derechos sociales
de los ciudadanos valencianos y de los
grupos y colectivos en que se integren sean
objeto de una aplicacin real y efectiva.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
20/50
4. Social Justice and Division of Power
Democratic Citizenship and Social Justice
Without the rule of law democratic citizenship is impossible. There can be other forms
of citizenship (legal, social, economic, global), but without a social and democratic rule of law
there are no guarantees that individuals can develop within all the dimensions of their lives as
citizens. They could do it as voters, as consumers, as patients, as believers, but democratic
citizenship allows a complete development of all dimensions of life. One can be citizen in a
non-democratic state, but citizenship would be limited and restricted. When we speak ofdemocratic citizenship we describe the conditions of belonging to a political community and
also the conditions of participation.
The level of integration and participation facilitates the application of the values of
liberty and equality. Furthermore, they make the justice within which they are expressed be not
just a nominal or virtual justice, it also measures up to the people and is a justice with a human
face, receiving the name of social justice.
Democratic Citizenship and Separation of Power
Unlike restrictive concepts of citizenship, democratic citizenship is a citizenship that
limits power in general. When there is a real consciousness of democratic citizenship it is difficultto exercise power in an arbitrary or tyrannical way. Democratic citizenship is the best tool
against despotism and tyranny because it promotes the separation of power.
The three traditional powers are legislative power (creation of laws), executive power
(governs according to the laws) and judicial power (applies laws and justice). The separation
of power is what we could call a principle of democratic health, because it allows some powers
to correct the others and these powers do not last over time.
7Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 4
ACTIVITIES:
1. What is democratic citizenship? Why is the separation of power so important?
2. Read the texts by Tocqueville y E. Daz carefully. What title would you give each of them?
What ideas are the authors defending?
Allowing citizens to be in charge of the administration of small matters, rather than presenting
them with the governing of bigger matters means you interest them in the public good and
you make them see the need that all people work to produce this good. First you occupy
the general interest and, by working for the wellbeing of fellow citizens, they acquire the habit
and love of serving them.
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America.
El Estado de derecho no es slo una cosa de juristasel Estado y el derecho no son sino
medios oportunos, puede que imprescindibles para un fin ms esencial: no se hizo el hombre
para ellos, sino ellos para el hombreA quienes en rigor ms importa que aqul exista,
funcione y sea real y formalmente respetado, no es tanto a los gobernantes sino a los
ciudadanos, a sus derechos, a sus libertades y a sus necesidades; y muy especialmente les
interesa a aquellos que pueden protegerse menos, o nada, por sus propios medios,
empezando por los de carcter econmico.E. Daz, Filosofa del derecho. Legalidad y Legitimidad
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
21/50
Introduction
Human rights have become the ethical, social and political reference of our
time. Their proclamation has meant new attitudes and a new mentality towards social,
political and cultural issues. They are major principles and ethical values which ethically
guide our behaviour from a social point of view. As we know, in a human being we
cannot separate the social and individual aspects, so we could say that they are like an
ethical lighthouse for our behaviour. They are not just ethical references for political
constitutions and legislations in different countries; they also help and promote people's
social and political activities. Human rights are therefore the backbone of active
citizenship.
Nevertheless, the use of human rights is often questioned due to their lack of
credibility. It seems that writing human rights into laws and constitutions is enough,
but it isn't. It is not enough that human rights are approved in laws; they have to be a
part of the social and political life of our countries, because if that does not happen they
lose credibility and trust. What does it matter if they are written but not applied? Whatis the point if they are protected only by words and not actions? Apart from a crisis of
credibility, there is also another problem: that they are just used for protesting and as a
way to solve conflicts. But we forget that they are also used as a way of building a
responsible and active citizenship, they can help create shared projects in which rights
are not just used for protest, but also as a means of imagining a shared life together.
Human rights are an ideal that can encourage the realisation of social life. They
are often great principles, norms or values that are rendered useless, but we also have
to look at the positive side: they teach us what we can achieve by changing laws and
rules. They let us withdraw from our conventionality and pull away from the idea thatlaws are fine as they are. Human rights are a motor of change, not only so that we can
protect them in words, but also as a means of inventing laws that will make them real.
When human rights form part of a constitution - the legal project of countries
and regions -, they are the legal form that guarantees the bond of citizenship. By
recognising ourselves in human rights, we recognise ourselves as sharing a common
dignity upon which we have the right to insist. In addition, and this is important, this
dignity can belong to everyone, not just a few. Thanks to human rights we can aspire
to an international and global citizenship But, as mentioned previously, they must be
human rights that help, guide and plan, thus becoming the duty and reponsibility of all
states and every one of us. The human rights, human duties and human responsibilities
of every one of us can become the heart of a common mission.
2Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 5
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
22/50
Contents
1. Human Rights
What are they?
Human rights are a way of acknowledging
and demanding the dignity of all human beings.
Human rights are not just a series of values we havemore or less agreed upon. They bear a lot of
responsibility because each right creates obligation
and duty. If we recognise and accept the right to
work as a right this means that we need to organise
society so that we create conditions that guarantee
work for everyone. This, of course, bears a great
responsibility for all, every single person and
mankind in general. That is why we must speak of rights, duties and responsibilities.
Human rights are not a "fairytale" we should tell from time to time and neither are they
a mere imposition from the Western world. They are a grand ethical project that can bring
together citizens at all levels.When were they founded?
World War II (1939-1945) saw some of the greatest acts of cruelty in the history of
mankind. After the war, states considered that it was necessary to have a series of legal and
institutional rules so that such a crimes could not happen again. With that purpose, the
Declaration of Human Rights was written in 1948, which was in part based on the Declaration
of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen from the French Revolution in 1789. The different
countries that would later form the United Nations reached a consensus and the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights was created.
On what are they based?
To base something on something else means to explain it, to give reasons for why it
was done that way and not another. In this case the question is: why these rights and not otherones? We agree and reach a consensus because these values are desirable and defensible.
It is not that they appear to be good because we agree, because agreeing on something does
not necessarily guarantee its goodness.
In the Declaration of Human Rights we can find three ways of justifying and explaining
these rights:
1. Individualist justification (anti-state); human rights are individual and natural, prior
to the State and therefore claimed by individuals and groups in the face of the State;
States must acknowledge these rights.
2. Statal justification (contractual); rights are the result of a contract or agreement
between the governors and governed, rights depend on the authority of the State.
3. Statal justification (historical); rights appear with the different forms of State of the
modern era. There are no rights prior to the State. The State, in its various forms,
is the one that proclaims them.
Maybe human rights can be considered as invariably human and therefore have to be
protected, guaranteed and promoted by States.
4Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 5
ACTIVITIES:
1. Write a short history of the devising of human rights. Pay attention to these three dates:
1776, 1789, 1948.
2. What is the difference between saying something is good and therefore we agree, and
saying that as we agree therefore it is good?
3. What would you base human rights on? How would you justify them? Why have they to be
obeyed?
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
23/50
2. The Three Generations of Rights
The affirmation of human rights was not something instantaneous and isolated. It was
the result of a historical process. Therefore, we speak of the generations of rights. In other
words, moments in which human rights appeared, or rather, when rights were recognised. It is
the story of a mankind that has given the human being increasingly more safeguards for certain
basic values.
5Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 5
ACTIVITIES:
1. Which of the three generations of rights is most important to you? Why?
2. Look for the terms "freedom", "equality" and "solidarity" in the dictionary. Why are they the basis for
the Declaration of Human Rights?
3. Look for or imagine an example of a violation of freedom, equality and solidarity.
THREE GENERATIONS OF
HUMAN RIGHTS
FIRST A fundamental moment in the
recognition of human rights is the French
Revolution (1789). Its ideals of freedom,
equality and fraternity are a guide for the
different generations of rights. The first
generation, the one in which the French
Revolution took place, has liberty as a
symbol. It was the recognition of civil and
political rights. People had the chance to
participate in decision-making, they arerecognised as people with the capacity to act.
SECOND The second generation of human
rights completes the first one. Rights referring
to individual freedom are not enough; it is
necessary to also proclaim those rights
related to the social and community
dimension. These rights refer to equality and
justice. A big step is taken towards social
responsibility in terms of these rights. It is not
enough to allow a laissez faire attitude. It is
necessary to promote, protect, guarantee ormotivate certain rights.
THIRD Nowadays, even though legally
protecting rights is still difficult, there has
been a call for a third generation. This would
be the modern version of fraternity and it is
called solidarity. It was created to promote
human interests such as peace or a clean
environment and implies a global
understanding of mankind. This set of rights
would complement the United Nations
Declaration of 1948.
Basic principles:
Civil and political rights:Right to live, to property, to
freedom of conscience and
expression, the right to freedom
of movement and association,
the right to participate in
politics, etc
Economic, social andcultural rights: The right to
culture and education, the right
to healthcare, the right to work.
The right to a clean social
environment, the right to
peace.
Main value
Freedom
Equality
Solidarity
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
24/50
3. Reading Your Rights
On the 10th of December 1948, the United Nations General Assembly approved the
text of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It has a preamble and 30 articles. You can
find the full declaration easily. Here we offer you a selection of articles. Read them carefully:
6Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 5
Article 1All human beings are born free and equal in
dignity and rights. They are endowed withreason and conscience and should acts towardsone another in a spirit of brotherhood.Article 3Everyone has the right to life, liberty and securityof person.Article 4No one shall be held in slavery or servitude;slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited inall their forms.Article 5No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel,inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 171. Everyone has the right to own property aloneas well as in association with others.
2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of hisproperty.Article 18Everyone has the right to freedom of thought,conscience and religion; this right includesfreedom to change his religion or belief, andfreedom, either alone or in community withothers and in public or private, to manifest hisreligion or belief in teaching, practice, worship
and observance.Article 19Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion andexpression; this right includes freedom to holdopinions without interference and to seek,receive and impart information and ideasthrough any media and regardless of frontiers.
Article 211. Everyone has the right to take part in thegovernment of his country, directly or throughfreely chosen representatives.2. Everyone has the right to equal access topublic service in his country.
3. The will of the people shall be the basis of theauthority of government; this will shall beexpressed in periodic and genuine electionswhich shall be by universal and equal suffrageand shall be held by secret vote or by equivalentfree voting procedures.
Article 251. Everyone has the right to a standard of living
adequate for the health and well-being of himselfand of his family, including food, clothing,housing and medical care and necessary socialservices, and the right to security in the event ofunemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood,old age or other lack of livelihood incircumstances beyond his control.2. Motherhood and childhood are entitled tospecial care and assistance. All children,whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy thesame social protection.Article 261. Everyone has the right to education.
Education shall be free, at least in theelementary and fundamental stages. Elementaryeducation shall be compulsory. Technical and
professional education shall be made generallyavailable and higher education shall be equallyaccessible to all on the basis of merit.2. Education shall be directed to the fulldevelopment of the human personality and tothe strengthening of respect for human rightsand fundamental freedoms. It shall promoteunderstanding, tolerance and friendship amongall nations, racial or religious groups, and shall
further the activities of the United Nations for themaintenance of peace.3. Parents have a prior right to choose the kindof education that shall be given to their children.Article 291. Everyone has duties to the community inwhich alone the free and full development of his
personality is possible.2. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms,everyone shall be subject only to such limitationsas are determined by law solely for the purposeof securing due recognition and respect for therights and freedoms of others and of meeting the
just requirements of morality, public order andthe general welfare in a democratic society.3. These rights and freedoms may in no case beexercised contrary to the purposes andprinciples of the United Nations.
ACTIVITIES:
1. Read the articles from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (you can use the ones shown
above or look for the full Declaration). After that:
- summarise each article with a word or sentence;
- explain each one in your own words;
- choose the most important one (and the reason for this);- choose the least important one (and say why);
- imagine you had to reduce the list to 10. Which ones would you keep?
- try and write a new article
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
25/50
4. The Rights, Duties and Responsibilities of Citizens
Human Rights are not mere instruments of protest. They imply a commitment by the
people to respect and care for them. This means that in the same way that rights are expressed,
so are duties and responsibilities. They are demands that I can make and commitments I must
accept. Try to fill out the chart of rights, duties and responsibilities following the examples given.
MAFALDA
7Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 5
ACTIVITIES:
What do you think this Mafalda cartoon means? Write a brief comment on it.
Article
3
5
17
18
RIGHTS
Everyone has the right to life,liberty and security of person.
No one shall be subjected to
torture or to cruel, inhuman ordegrading treatment or
punishment.
1. Everyone has the right to ownproperty alone as well as in
association with others.2. No one shall be arbitrarily
deprived of his property.
Everyone has the right of thought,
conscience and religion; this right
includes freedom to change his
religion or belief, and freedom,either alone or in community with
others and in public or private, to
manifest his religion or belief in
teaching, practise, worship andobservance.
DUTIES
Therefore I mustnot attack the life or
integrity of any other
person.
I shall not criticise
anyone for having a
different religion or
belief to mine.
RESPONSIBILITIES
I have the responsibility to ensurethat this does not happen and if I
saw it happening I should report it to
the authorities.
I have to take care that that person,
for example a classmate, can
express his opinion freely.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
26/50
Introduction
Unlike the ancient world, where the exercising of political power and the organisation
of society were related to features or characteristics of certain people in positions of authority,
the modern world is radically different. Power and society are structured by laws written in
documents that are within everyones reach. These texts or documents regulating political
power and describing the way institutions function according to certain values, moral ideals orphilosophical principles are called constitutions.
These documents are not just compilations of laws or political institutions. Theyre not
just books containing the legal system of a place, theyre documents expressing a model of
citizenship. In this unit we will study the Spanish Constitution of 1978 and well see how the
foundations for the promotion of democratic citizenship are established in it.
The Constitution expresses the will of the people, and what is technically considered
as the general will or majority will of the people of a nation, town, country or certain society is
recorded in it. The origin and organisation of power is clearly described in the constitution. The
1978 Constitution is democratic because it states that the Spanish people have the power, inother words, power is in the hands of citizens who are considered free and equal before the law.
The Spanish Constitution promotes a model of democratic citizenship. In other words,
it promotes a model ofactive citizenship where the people who make up the socio-political
community can build democracy. This means two things: in the first place, it means that the
constitution can structure the daily life of citizens and thats why we talk about a lived constitution
instead of about a written one. Also, it means that the constitution not only regulates and
structures duties, but also responsibilities. The organisation of rights and duties is not arbitrary,
it does not depend on the arbitrary decision of any authority but on an ethical horizon of superior
values present in the first article of the constitution, which reads: Espaa se constituye en un
estado social y democrtico de derecho, que propugna como valores superiores de suordenamiento jurdico la libertad, la justicia, la igualdad y el pluralismo poltico.
2Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 6
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
27/50
Contents
1.From Transition to Constitution
The 1978 Constitution was the result of a historic process called the transition. SinceFrancos death in 1975 until the promulgation of the Constitution in 1978 a certain amount oftime passed which marked the leap from dictatorship to democracy, from a non-democratic
political system to a democratic one. This movement from one political system to another onereceived the name transition because it didnt happen through political reform. Theprotagonists of the period debated between three possible solutions:
Involution, mantaining the principles of the former system.Revolution, breaking with everything in order to create a new system.Reform, a progressive change from one system to another.Although the term transition is used to name the political period, it actually describes
all the political, legal, social and cultural changes. All these changes led to a process whoseresult was the constitutional text.
The process began some months before Francos death, after the assassination ofAdmiral Carrero Blanco (13th of December 1973), when the new president, Carlos Arias
Navarro made a political speech proclaiming that social conditions in Spain had changed. Thelegal predictions of the Fundamental Laws (former regime) had ignored political realities(expectations of change). Although it was said that everything was well tied down, theFundamental Laws were unclear and open to interpretation. Arias Navarro said that the formerpolitical system was based on joining things together and the new one on participation.
The new government consolidated the expectations of change when the law on localadministration was enacted. It accepted, without exception, universal suffrage and a decreelaw of association that would be tolerant to organised groups. Until then associations were notdefined as the exercising of a citizen's right, rather they were a means of political control.
After Francos death on the 22nd of December 1975, theParliament and the Council of the Kingdom met in order toconstitutionally proclaim the King. After the changes that followedFrancos death, the government of Arias Navarro suffered a crisis,which saw Adolfo Surez Gonzlez come in as the new president. Anew strategy appeared in which a fundamental law was substituted bythe authorities and new instruments (Parliament, Referendum) thatcould be presented as the will of thenation were created. On the 15th ofDecember 1976 the Law for
Political Reform was brought to referendum. This was adecisive instrument of the political transition because:
- The people became a decisive element of politicalreform.
- The parliament would be a representative organand have two chambers that would write the newconstitution.
- A pluralist system of parties was established and for the Constituent Parliamentaryelections, held the 15th of June 1977, a new system was established.
4Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 6
ACTIVITIES:
1. Define the "transition" in your own words.
2. Look for more information about the "personalities" mentioned on this page.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
28/50
2. The "Fathers" of the Constitution
The elaboration of the Constitution was made possible because of the understan-ding and will to listen and get on with each other shown by the different political forces of thetime. Without this spirit of respect, tolerance and agreement on fundamental values theConstitution would not have happened. But political forces are not anonymous entities; the-yre moved by the effort and hard work of individuals. Among those individuals seven, to beprecise, wrote our constitution. Theyre called the fathers of the Constitution.
5Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 6
ACTIVITIES:
1. Extend the information about the fathers of the Constitution. What did each one of themcontribute to the Constitution? Which points were most important for them?2. Why is it important and significant that theyre called Fathers?3. What is the spirit of agreement? Why is it a value that should not be forgotten?
DECLARATION OF GREDOS: On the 7th of October 2003, in honour of the 25th anniversaryof the popular referendum on the Spanish Constitution, the authors of the Magna Carta, the so-called Fathers of the Constitution, with the exception of Jordi Sol Tura (who because of illnesscould not assist, rather he subscribed to the act from his home)-, met in the National Parador
of Gredos, the same place where, in 1978, the guidelines of the Spanish Constitution wereagreed upon. They signed and read, as a demonstration of their "pride and joy at theconfidence that the citizens and their respective political parties placed in them, a text in whichthey asked for the values, principles and ground rules established in 1978 to be maintained,insisting that possible changes to the constitutional text should be done with the same spirit ofconsensus that existed back then.
7/28/2019 4 ESO teora compl
29/50
3. The Higher Values of the Constitution
The Constitution, as we know, is not just a compilation of laws. Theyre laws based on,inspired and guided by values, the so-called higher values. But what is a higher value? It's bestto find out first what a value is.
A value is whatever makes something preferred, desired. It is something that guidesour behaviour. A value is something that, if it disappeared from the world, we would think thatsomething important and irreplaceable, for example, beauty, harmony, truth, etc has
disappeared. In terms of social life and citizenship, values are whatever guides and provides afoundation for social and civic life. The "higher values" are the basic, fundamental ones fromwhich other less important ones will be derived and on which the laws of the Constitution arebased. These laws cannot go against these values, rather they have to develop and guaranteethem.
What are the fundamental values of the Spanish Constitution? Theyre clearly statedin article 1.1 of the Ttulo preliminar:
6Education for Citizenship and Human Rights. Unit 6
ACTIVITIES:
1. These four fundamental values have a clear and exact reference in the Declaration ofHuman Rights. Remember this subject, referred to previously, and look for the exactHuman Rights to which they are related. The articles of the Constitution develop thesevalues. Look in the Constitution for an article that discusses each of these values.
2. These values guarantee and provide a basis for coexistence among citizens both at anational level and also in smaller areas. Coexistence in school, high school, class, etc
also has to be based on these values, especially in the first three. Write an example ofthese values applied at school and pay attention to the necessary harmony that has toexist between them:
Espaa se constituye en un Estado social y democrtico de Derecho, que propugna
como valores superiores de su ordenamiento jurdico la libertad, la justicia, la
igualdad y el pluralismo poltico
Freedom in cl