PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch
DDeecceemmbbeerr 22001111
To obtain additional copies of this report, or to forward your comments, please use the following address:
Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch Department of Education and Early Childhood Development
of New Brunswick P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, NB
E3B 5H1
Tel.: 506-453-2157 Fax: 506-462-2201
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1
December 2011 _____________________________________________________________
Une version française de ce document est également disponible.
Contact/Téléphonez aux Communications 506-444-4714
Fax/Télécopie: 506-457-4810
E-ail: [email protected] Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1
PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss
FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss DDeecceemmbbeerr 22001111
ISBN : 978-1-55471-944-0
Francophone School Districts
IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn
i
IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn
he Department of Education and Early Childhood Development is pleased to present this provincial
statistical report to give school staff, parents, and the public a general idea of how students in New Brunswick’s Francophone school districts did on the provincial examinations administered in the 2010-2011 school year. A similar document is produced for the Anglophone school districts. However, results from the Anglophone and francophone school districts are not comparable because the school programs are different. This document has four chapters. The first is an overview of the learning evaluation program. The second chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the elementary level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 2 and Grade 4 Literacy, Grades 5 and 8 Sciences et technologies, Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques, and Grades 5 and 8 Français.
The third chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the high school level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 11 Mathématiques and Grade 11 Français, as well as the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment. The fourth chapter contains a brief description of pan-Canadian and international assessments in addition to results showing how New Brunswick matches up against the other Canadian provinces and the OECD member countries on these assessments. Any comments likely to make this report more informative and complete should be sent to the following address: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, N.B. E3B 5H1
T
ii
Table of Contents
iii
TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn......................................................................................................................... i
CChhaapptteerr 11 PPrroovviinncciiaall EEvvaalluuaattiioonn PPrrooggrraamm aatt tthhee EElleemmeennttaarryy aanndd HHiigghh SScchhooooll LLeevveellss
Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?............. 1 What subjects were tested? ................................................................................... 1
How are the exams prepared? ............................................................................... 1
How are the exams administered? ......................................................................... 2
How is exam marking coordinated? ....................................................................... 2
How are the exams marked? ................................................................................. 2
Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results? .............. 2
How are the exams followed up? ........................................................................... 3
CChhaapptteerr 22 PPrroovviinncciiaall EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level...................... 5
What is the purpose of these exams? ........................................................ 5
What is tested? .......................................................................................... 5 Charts
1 to 6 Grade 2 provincial Literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4 ................................................................................... 6
7 to 12 Percentage of students having passed the provincial Grade 3 Mathématiques exam ................................................................. 12
13 to 18 Provincial Grade 4 Literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher, by school, including the district and province ............................................................................ 18
19 to 24 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province .......................................... 24
25 to 30 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Mathématiques exam, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 30
Table of Contents
iv
31 to 36 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Français exam, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 36
37 to 42 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province .......................................... 42
43 to 48 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Mathématiques exam, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 48
49 to 54 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Français exam, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 54
55 to 64 Résultats des examens au primaire selon le sexe, les districts et la province ................................................................................................ 60
CChhaapptteerr 33 PPrroovviinncciiaall HHiigghh SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss
Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level ............................... 67
What is the purpose of these exams? ...................................................... 67
What is the passing grade? ...................................................................... 67 Charts
65 Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex ................................. 68
66 à 69 Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex? ............................ 69
70 à 81 Differencee between provincial exam average and school mark average ................................................................................ 71
Is there an appreciable difference between the exam marks and the school marks? ..................................................................................... 72
82 à 85 Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 79
What is the performance index? ............................................................... 80
86 Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province ........................................................... 84
Second language oral proficiency scale ................................................... 84
87 à 130 Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the district and province, since 2007 .......... 87
Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level .................. 110 Grade 11 Français (regular level) ....................................................... 111
Table of Contents
v
Grade 11Français (modified level) ..................................................... 112
Grade 11 Mathématiques (regular level) ............................................ 113
Grade 11 Mathématiques (modified level) .......................................... 114
ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) .................... 115
CChhaapptteerr 44 RReessuullttss ooff PPaann--CCaannaaddiiaann aanndd IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaall AAsssseessssmmeennttss
Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA)
Assessment Programs ................................................................................... 117
What are SAIP and PCAP? .................................................................... 117
Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP? ............................................. 117
Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP? ............................................. 118
What is PISA?......................................................................................... 118
Who participates in PISA? ...................................................................... 118
How are students selected? (PISA) ........................................................ 119
How is the information used? (PISA) ...................................................... 119 Graphique
131-136 Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country,
for each PCAP 2010 domain .................................................................. 120
137-149 Average scores and confidence interval, by province and country, For each PISA domain (2000 to 2009) ................................................... 129
CCoonncclluussiioonn ....................................................................................................................... 149
Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chapter 1
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels
Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?
For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These are
What subjects were tested?
All the results presented in this document arefrom the 14 provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2010-2011 school year. The subjectstested were as follows:
- Grades 2 and 4 Literacy;- Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques;
1
Chapter 1
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels
Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?
For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These arequestions being asked by parents, othereducation stakeholders, and New Brunswicktaxpayers as a whole.
To answer these questions, a provincialevaluation program was set up to assessstudents’ skills in literacy, mathematics, andscience and technology at key stages in theeducation system.
The provincial evaluations are also used toassess studies for the purpose of awardingthe high school diploma.
What subjects were tested?
All the results presented in this document arefrom the 14 provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2010-2011 school year. The subjectstested were as follows:
- Grades 2 and 4 Literacy;- Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques;- Grades 5 and 8 Français;- Grades 5 and 8 Sciences &
technologies;- Grade10 ESL;- Grade 11 Mathématiques (regularand modified; and
- Grade 11 Français (regular and modified).
How are the exams prepared?
The provincial examinations are developedtogether with teaching staff. Supervision isprovided by provincial evaluation consultantsin association with the provincial and districtcurriculum officers concerned. The theoreticalfoundations and nature of the exams aredefined in the assessment framework for eachsubject.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 1
How are the exams administered?
The rules and procedures to be followed inorder to ensure uniform administration of theexams are set out in an administration guide,which is updated and distributed to theschools for each exam session. TheFrancophone Assessment and EvaluationBranch is responsible for coordinating andadministering the exams .
How is exam marking coordinated?
For each subject tested, head markers aretrained beforehand to oversee the use of themarking grids and ensure uniform scoringprovince-wide. Marking is coordinated byprovincial evaluation consultants incooperation with provincial curriculum officers.
Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results?
When comparing averages for a given subject,we must take into account the measurementerror associated with each score before wecan claim there is a difference between twoaverages. Using the standard error, a range(confidence interval) is established, withinwhich the true value of the average is locatedin 95% of cases. The 95% confidence intervalused in this report is calculated by adding twostandard errors on each side of the average.The difference between the averages of twoschools is said to be significant if theirconfidence intervals do not overlap.
In reviewing the provincial examination resultsat the high school level, it should be noted thatstudents enrolled in regular-level courses writeone set of exams, while those enrolled in
2
How are the exams marked?
Once the exams have been administered, thehigh school students’ booklets are sent tothree marking centres located in Shediac,Edmundston, and Bathurst. The elementaryschool students’ booklets are sent to a singlemarking centre at either the Moncton orEdmundston campus of the Université deMoncton. The constructed-response questionsare marked by teaching staff under thecoordination of the head markers (teachers ordistrict supervisors), who are trained by theprovincial evaluation consultants. Theselected-response questions are markedelectronically .
gone set of exams, while those enrolled inmodified-level courses write another.Interestingly, in schools having a largepercentage of students enrolled at the regularlevel, the results are often better than, or atleast comparable with, those of other schoolsfor both the regular- and modified-levelexams. This makes it very important toconsider the percentage of students enrolledat each level.
We must bear in mind as well that provincialexam marks and school marks are only two ofmany factors indicating a school’s overallsituation. Socioeconomic conditions,demographics, what is expected of students,and parental involvement also influencestudent performance. This report does nottake the latter factors into account.
Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
How are the exams followed up?
At the high school level, a statistical reportbreaking down the results by skill and contentis published after each exam session. Itcontains a description of the school resultsand the provincial average for each subject.This statistical report is available in PDFformat at the following Web address :
http://www.gnb.ca/education/francophone-f.asp#1
The school districts, together with the schooladministrators and teaching staff, areresponsible for interpreting the results anddeveloping an education plan. The statisticsare reviewed at the provincial level to aid indecision making regarding curricula.
3
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 1
4
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chapter 2
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or not
What is tested?
The exams are developed on the basis of alist of topics drawn up by school districtpersonnel and Department consultants. Thetopics are derived from the provincial curriculaand identify the elements essential for further
5
Chapter 2
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or notstudents have mastered the skills and abilitiesassociated with the curricula being evaluated.
Using the results, teaching staff and schooladministrators can develop and applyappropriate action strategies for correctingweaknesses noted among students, and canguide students in a review of what they havelearned.
The results are also analyzed by the schoolsand school districts and the Department ofEducation.
What is tested?
The exams are developed on the basis of alist of topics drawn up by school districtpersonnel and Department consultants. Thetopics are derived from the provincial curriculaand identify the elements essential for furtherdevelopment of skills in Grades 5 and 8Sciences et technologies, in Grades 3, 5, and8 Mathématiques, and in Grades 5 and 8Français.
At the end of Grade 2, reading comprehensionis evaluated at the provincial level. This examconsists of a reading comprehension test andan oral reading test. Reading comprehensionis also evaluated at the beginning of Grade 4.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Grade 2 provincial literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4
Description of performance levels for the Grade 2 literacy exam
Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.
Level 2 – The student will be able to:read and understand straightforward, illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read variousfamiliar words, e.g., cat, dog, happy, give; break down words into their constituent sounds,e.g., teach-er, pa-per; read various words made up of complex sounds, e.g., neighbour,bread; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; read while making mistakesthat do not change the meaning of a text; retell what he/she has read and give additionaldetails when asked questions; identify the main characters and events.
Level 3* – The student will be able to:d d d t d ill t t d t t d t hi /h l l d f f ili d
6
Level 3 – The student will be able to:read and understand illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read a range of familiar words,e.g., eyes, red, morning, reading; read words made up of complex sounds, e.g., friend, said,would; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; find the meaning of a wordbased on the context; read fluently and observe punctuation marks; retell what he/she hasread and describe most of the events of the story; describe the characters, the centralproblem, and how the problem is solved; find answers to questions using clues contained inthe text.
Level 4 – The student will be able to:read and understand texts geared to his/her level, with or without picture support; explain the varioustechniques he/she uses to read words; find the meaning of a word based on the context; readfluently and observe punctuation marks so as to read expressively; retell what he/she has read anddescribe the main events of the story; describe the characters, the central problem, and how theproblem is solved; find answers to questions using clues given in the text or by drawing on personalexperiences or even by making generalizations extending beyond the content of the text.
* By the end of Grade 2, students are expected to have attained Level 3.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 1
District 01 n= 696
District 03 n= 436
District 05 n= 350
District 09 n= 382
District 11 n= 375
Province n= 2239
Chart 2
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
Grade 2
Literacy
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy assessment at Grade 2 by District, Including the Province
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
7773
6976 75 7476 76 75
83
74 77
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Reading Comprehension Oral Reading
target
Des Bâtisseurs n= 85
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 33
Saint‐Henri n= 99
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 42
Amirault n= 169
Abbey‐Landry n= 33
Sainte‐Thérèse n= 75
Champlain n= 85
District 01 n= 696
Province n= 2239
n= 76Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
7
Number of students who
wrote the exam
74
77
72
76
91
83
54
69
70
84
80
77
76
72
81
82
88
57
56
76
81
79
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Sainte‐Thérèse
Abbey‐Landry
Amirault
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 3
Ernest‐Lang n= 11
Sainte‐Anne n= 15
Saint‐Joseph n= 11
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 52
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 10
Centre d'appren‐
tissage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 21
Grade 2
Literacy
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Régionale
Saint‐Basilen= 31
73
80
79
55
77
60
80
73
71
69
62
83
67
76
64
84
80
67
73
62
75
G d Ri iè
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 33
Notre‐Dame n= 61
Grande‐Rivière n= 26
Mgr‐Lang n= 24
Marie‐Immaculée n= 18
Echo Jeunesse n= 24
Mgr‐Martin n= 40
District 03 n= 436
Province n= 2239
n= 41
n= 18
Élémentaire
Sacré‐Coeur
Régional de
Saint‐André
8
74
73
85
75
72
50
72
65
77
76
90
83
61
83
89
62
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 4
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 65
n= 19
Le Tournesol n= 53
Séjour‐Jeunesse* n= 3
District 05
n= 18
Académie
Assomptionn= 16
La Croisée
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Carrefour‐
Étudiantn= 39
François‐Xavier‐
Daigle
Grade 2
Literacy
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveur*n= 3
67
80
75
68
53
67
79
69
67
77
75
81
50
56
85
75
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse*
Le Tournesol
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur*
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
Apollo‐XI n= 44
Mgr‐Melanson n= 15
Versant‐Nord n= 17
Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 6
Arthur‐Pinet* n= 4
District 05 n= 350
Province n= 2239
Académie
Notre‐Damen= 28
n= 20Domaine‐des‐
Copains
9
74
69
50
100
61
59
67
77
75
70
100
82
82
67
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet*
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 5
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 10
Centre la fontaine n= 25
René‐Chouinard n= 24
L'Amitié n= 20
La Source n= 28
La Ruche n= 55
La Passerelle n= 31
L'Envolée n= 29
L'Étincelle n= 16
La‐Rivière n= 15
Grade 2
Literacy
District 09
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐
Saint‐Isidoren= 16
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
73
88
83
81
55
87
79
75
54
80
80
87
94
86
94
68
82
89
80
58
88
90
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 25
Le Maillon n= 16
Ola‐léger n= 9
District 09 n= 382
Province n= 2239
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 16
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 38
L'Escale‐des‐
Jeunesn= 9
10
74
76
78
78
81
82
60
81
73
77
83
78
67
94
97
72
94
87
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Le Maillon
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 6
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 31
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 26
Grande‐Digue n= 18
Donat‐Robichaud n= 25
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
La Marée‐
Montanten= 24
Régionale‐de‐
Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 22
Père‐Edgar‐
T.‐LeBlancn= 32
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 21
Grade 2
Literacy
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
87
78
63
76
89
95
88
52
50
95
80
76
66
84
67
82
81
55
71
95
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 15
Camille‐Vautour n= 27
Saint‐Paul n= 7
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 7
Notre‐Dame n= 12
District 11 n= 375
Province n= 2239
Blanche‐
Bourgeoisn= 20
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 37
11
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 51
74
75
76
75
67
71
71
74
87
77
74
78
65
75
57
71
78
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont Carmel
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Percentage of students having passed the provincial Grade 3 Mathématiques exam
12
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 7
District 01 n= 652
District 03 n= 407
District 05 n= 338
District 09 n= 412
District 11 n= 365
Province n= 2174
Chart 8
Grade 3
Mathématiques
Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including the Province
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
7782
65
74
64
73
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
Des Bâtisseurs n= 104
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 23
Anna Malenfant n= 109
Saint‐Henri n= 69
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 21
Amirault n= 57
Abbey‐Landry n= 42
Sainte‐Thérèse n= 75
Champlain n= 97
District 01 n= 652
Province n= 2174
13
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 55
73
77
75
69
74
75
71
75
85
65
83
78
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Sainte‐Thérèse
Abbey‐Landry
Amirault
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 9
Ernest‐Lang* n= 5
Sainte‐Anne n= 14
Saint‐Joseph n= 13
District 03 Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
Grade 3
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 37
Centre d'appren‐
tissage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 19
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 11
Régionale
Saint‐Basilen= 29
77
93
78
92
69
55
64
84
92
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang*
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 40
Notre‐Dame n= 40
Grande‐Rivière n= 30
Mgr‐Lang n= 18
Marie‐Immaculée n= 25
Echo Jeunesse n= 30
Mgr‐Martin n= 37
District 03 n= 407
Province n= 2174
Élémentaire
Sacré‐Coeurn= 39
Régional de
Saint‐Andrén= 20
14
73
82
92
87
100
94
85
57
77
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 10
n= 61
n= 40
n= 46
n= 4
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveur*n= 3
Grade 3
Mathématiques
District 05 Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
École Carrefour‐
Étudiantn= 30
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 15
Académie
Assomptionn= 14
La Croisée
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
Le Tournesol
Séjour‐Jeunesse *
63
78
93
59
48
60
50
67
Mgr Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse *
Le Tournesol
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur*
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 41
n= 16
n= 17
n= 6
n= 10
District 05 n= 338
Province n= 2174
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Apollo‐XI
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 16
15
Mgr‐Melanson
Versant‐Nord
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 19
* Les résultats des écoles ayant cinq inscriptions ou moins ne sont pas publiés maissont comptabilisés dans les résultats du district et de la province.
73
65
50
50
50
79
94
63
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 11
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 11
Centre la fontaine n= 23
René‐Chouinard n= 11
L'Amitié n= 16
La Source n= 35
La Ruche n= 57
La Passerelle n= 27
L'Envolée n= 46
L'Étincelle n= 15
La‐Rivière n= 14
La Relève‐de‐
Saint‐Isidore
Grade 3
Mathématiques
District 09 Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 22
100
87
65
68
74
70
66
69
91
65
27
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 23
Le Maillon n= 13
Ola‐léger n= 17
District 09 n= 412
Province n= 2174
n= 9
n= 33
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 40
L'Escale‐des‐
Jeunes
16
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandre
73
74
65
89
92
88
74
88
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Le Maillon
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 12
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 43
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 15
Grande‐Digue n= 24
Donat‐Robichaud n= 24
Grade 3
Mathématiques
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 19
La Marée‐
Montanten= 30
Régionale‐de‐
Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 22
Père‐Edgar‐
T.‐LeBlancn= 31
Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
93
66
65
50
75
77
33
58
60
74
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 14
Camille‐Vautour n= 20
Saint‐Paul n= 6
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 12
Notre‐Dame n= 11
District 11 n= 365
Province n= 2174
17
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 50
Blanche‐
Bourgeoisn= 14
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 30
73
64
57
64
73
75
67
55
93
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Provincial Grade 4 Literacy exam,percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher, by school, including the districts and province
Description of performance levels for the Grade 4 literacy exam
Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.
Level 2 – The student will be able to:find the meaning of certain words or expressions from the context; retrieve certain explicitinformation and combine information according to a proposed structure; identify the subjectof the text and most of the important information; make certain predictions when theinformation is explicit; provide meaning for certain substitution words; identify the structuralelements of the text; reconstruct the chronological order of certain events of the story; makeconnections between the different parts of the text and relate some ideas to personalexperiences; make inferences clearly suggested by the text but will sometimes have troublejustifying them; respond to the text with personal experiences.
Level 3* – The student will be able to:find the meaning of most of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve most of theexplicit information select various relevant pieces of information and combine them
18
find the meaning of most of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve most of theexplicit information, select various relevant pieces of information and combine themaccording to a proposed structure; identify the important information and the main idea;make accurate predictions when the information is explicit and certain predictions when theinformation is implicit; provide meaning for various substitution words and some linkingwords; use indices to guide understanding and interpret certain elements of pictorialrepresentation; reconstruct the chronological order and most of the events of the story;make connections between the different parts of the text and relate most of the ideas topersonal experiences; make inferences and justify them most of the time; respond to thetext based on the content and personal experiences
Level 4 – The student will be able to:find the meaning of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve explicitinformation, select the relevant information and put it together according to a proposedstructure; identify certain secondary ideas; make accurate predictions when the informationis implicit and adjust them as needed; provide meaning for substitution words and manylinking words; interpret pictorial representations; reconstruct the chronological order of theevents of the story; make connections between the different parts of the text and relate theideas to situations in everyday life and other texts; make inferences and justify them with thetext while formulating opinions.
* At the beginning of Grade 4, students are expected to have attained Level 3.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 13
District 01 n= 589
District 03 n= 430
District 05 n= 343
District 09 n= 398
District 11 n= 377
Province n= 2137
Chart 14Percentage of students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the
Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
Grade 4
Literacy
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4 by District, Including the Province
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
60 58
71 69
44
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
Des Bâtisseurs n= 93
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 22
Anna Malenfant n= 104
Saint‐Henri n= 73
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 20
Amirault n= 37
Abbey‐Landry n= 37
Sainte‐Thérèse n= 59
Champlain n= 95
District 01 n= 589
Province n= 2137
19
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 49
Number of students who
wrote the exam
60
60
46
51
57
57
80
58
76
55
63
63
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Sainte‐Thérèse
Abbey‐Landry
Amirault
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 15
Ernest‐Lang n= 7
Sainte‐Anne n= 11
Saint‐Joseph n= 22
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 41
District 03 Percentage of students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 31
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 12
Régionale Saint‐
Basilen= 23
Grade 4
Literacy
54
72
50
59
74
50
36
71
52
61
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 54
Notre‐Dame n= 53
Grande‐Rivière n= 17
Mgr‐Lang n= 24
Marie‐Immaculée n= 15
Echo Jeunesse n= 29
Mgr‐Martin n= 38
District 03 n= 430
Province n= 2137
20
Élémentaire Sacré‐
Coeurn= 35
Régional de Saint‐
Andrén= 18
60
58
71
62
60
46
39
47
54
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 16
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 60
n= 28
Séjour‐Jeunesse* n= 3
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveur*n= 5
Le Domaine‐
Étudiantn= 50
École Carrefour‐
Étudiantn= 37
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 17
La Croisée
Académie n= 18
Grade 4
Literacy
District 05
87
66
44
61
71
78
70
77
Mgr Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse*
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur*
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 35
Mgr‐Melanson n= 15
Versant‐Nord n= 17
n= 10
Arthur‐Pinet n= 6
District 05 n= 343
Province n= 2137
21
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 19
Apollo‐XI
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 23
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Assomptionn= 18
60
71
79
33
70
70
76
87
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 17
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 8
Centre la fontaine n= 20
René‐Chouinard n= 8
L'Amitié n= 23
La Source n= 35
La Ruche n= 52
La Passerelle n= 24
L'Envolée n= 47
L'Étincelle n= 15
La‐Rivière n= 11
Grade 4
Literacy
District 09 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 19
64
87
66
68
71
71
86
48
63
35
50
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 23
Le Maillon n= 13
Ola‐léger n= 13
District 09 n= 398
Province n= 2137
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 31
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 40
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 16
22
60
69
62
75
77
95
70
48
64
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Le Maillon
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 18
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 29
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 17
Grande‐Digue n= 27
Donat‐Robichaud n= 38
Grade 4
Literacy
District 11 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 19
La Marée‐
Montanten= 46
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 16
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐
LeBlancn= 28
50
51
39
55
67
38
18
31
37
74
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 8
Camille‐Vautour n= 25
Saint‐Paul n= 6
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 7
Notre‐Dame n= 11
District 11 n= 377
Province n= 2137
23
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 59
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 20
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 21
60
44
24
45
64
57
0
36
50
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province
24
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 19
District 01 n= 587
District 03 n= 414
District 05 n= 374
District 09 n= 461
District 11 n= 369
Province n= 2205
Chart 20
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam by School,
Including the Districts and Province
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
District 01
83 8076 74 74
78
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
63Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Des Bâtisseurs n= 99
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 19
Anna‐Malenfant n= 183
Saint‐Henri n= 77
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 17
Abbey‐Landry n= 44
Champlain n= 77
District 01 n= 587
Province n= 2205
n= 71
Number of students who
wrote the exam
25
Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
78
83
77
82
100
84
91
84
83
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Abbey‐Landry
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Champlain
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 21
Ernest‐Lang n= 11
Sainte‐Anne n= 18
Centre d'apprentis‐
sage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 23
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 43
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerolle*n= 5
Régionale n= 29
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
72
75
95
83
83
100
74
79
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle*
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Joseph n= 20
Saint‐Jacques n= 48
Notre‐Dame n= 46
Grande‐Rivière n= 23
Mgr‐Lang n= 30
Marie‐Immaculée n= 19
Echo Jeunesse n= 21
Mgr‐Martin n= 34
District 03 n= 80
Province n= 78
Régional de
Saint‐Andrén= 15
Saint‐Basilen= 29
Élémentaire
Sacré‐Coeurn= 29
26
78
80
97
86
84
67
53
83
83
72
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 22
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveur
n= 55
n= 40
n= 21
District 05
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
Le Domaine‐
Étudiant
n= 9
École Carrefour‐
Étudiant
n= 59
François‐Xavier‐
Daigle
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
64
71
43
78
71
78
82
A ll XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse*
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 35
n= 5
n= 34
Mgr‐Melanson n= 21
n= 21
Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 10
n= 13
N= 374
Province N= 2205
District 05
Académie
Assomptionn= 14
Séjour‐Jeunesse*
La Croisée
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐
Dame
Apollo‐XI
Versant‐Nord
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 14
n= 23
27
78
76
71
54
100
91
76
71
94
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 23
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 18
Centre la fontaine n= 32
René‐Chouinard n= 14
L'Amitié n= 25
La Source n= 41
La Ruche n= 74
La Passerelle n= 23
L'Envolée n= 51
É
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 09
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 17
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
73
65
91
78
71
52
79
81
50
É
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
L'Étincelle n= 11
La‐Rivière n= 11
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 26
Ola‐léger n= 13
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 12
District 09 n= 461
Province n= 2205
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 35
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 42
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 16
28
78
74
83
92
81
69
88
74
73
36
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 24
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 34
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 27
Grande‐Digue n= 18
Donat‐Robichaud n= 35
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 21
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 16
La Marée‐
Montanten= 33
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
84
67
71
72
63
74
82
76
86
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 12
n= 17
Saint‐Paul* n= 4
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 8
Notre‐Dame n= 12
District n= 369
Province n= 2205
Camille‐Vautour
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐
LeBlancn= 43
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeois
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 16
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 41
n= 32
29
78
74
68
69
100
88
53
75
84
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul*
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Mathématiques examby school, including the districts and province
30
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 25
District 01 n= 592
District 03 n= 414
District 05 n= 378
District 09 n= 469
District 11 n= 367
Province n= 2220
Chart 26
Grade 5
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 Percentage of Students Aaving Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including
the Province
81 8275 72
75 77
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
71Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Des Bâtisseurs n= 98
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 20
Anna‐Malenfant n= 184
Saint‐Henri n= 78
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 18
Abbey‐Landry n= 45
Champlain n= 79
District 01 n= 592
Province n= 2220
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 70
31
77
81
82
87
83
77
86
45
86
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Abbey‐Landry
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Champlain
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 27
Ernest‐Lang n= 11
Sainte‐Anne n= 18
Saint‐Joseph n= 20
Grade 5
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03
Centre d'apprentis‐
sage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 23
Carrefour de la
Jeunesse
n= 5
Régionale Saint‐
Basilen= 28
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
n= 42
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerolle*
90
73
79
80
86
78
100
87
88
Élémentaire Sacré Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle*
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 48
Notre‐Dame n= 48
Grande‐Rivière n= 22
Mgr‐Lang n= 30
Marie‐Immaculée n= 19
Echo Jeunesse n= 21
Mgr‐Martin n= 34
District 03 n= 414
Province n= 2220
32
Élémentaire Sacré‐
Coeurn= 30
Régional de Saint‐
Andrén= 15
77
82
94
86
79
73
80
68
90
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 28
n= 55
n= 37
n= 5
District 05
n= 21
Séjour‐Jeunesse*
n= 15
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveur
La Croisée
Grade 5
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
École Carrefour‐
Étudiant
n= 59
n= 9
Le Domaine‐
Étudiant
Académie
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
François‐Xavier‐
Daigle
n= 39
97
60
62
62
56
61
78
82
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse*
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 36
Mgr‐Melanson n= 21
n= 21
n= 10
Arthur‐Pinet n= 13
District 05 n= 378
Province n= 2220
33
n= 15
n= 23
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Versant‐Nord
Apollo‐XI
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 14
Assomption
Académie Notre‐
Dame
77
75
93
85
100
87
90
76
97
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 29
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 18
Centre la fontaine n= 32
René‐Chouinard n= 16
L'Amitié n= 27
La Source n= 42
La Ruche n= 76
La Passerelle n= 24
L'Envolée n= 51
L'Étincelle n= 11
La‐Rivière n= 10
Grade 5
Mathématiques
District 09
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 17
36
76
76
63
71
90
56
69
69
50
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Ola‐léger n= 13
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 12
District 09 n= 469
Province n= 2220
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 44
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 26
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 15
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 35
34
77
72
92
92
60
77
92
66
50
36
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L Étincelle
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 30
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 34
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 27
Donat‐Robichaud n= 35
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 43
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
Mathématiques
5e année
District 11
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 18
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Marée‐
Montanten= 33
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 16
Grande‐Digue n= 18
83
87
88
69
78
69
59
76
82
83
Mont Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 12
Camille‐Vautour n= 18
Saint‐Paul* n= 4
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 8
Notre‐Dame n= 12
District 11 n= 367
Province n= 2220
LeBlancn= 43
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 31
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 17
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 41
35
77
75
66
65
92
63
67
83
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul*
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Français exam by school, including the districts and province
36
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 31
District 01 n= 592
District 03 n= 414
District 05 n= 367
District 09 n= 460
District 11 n= 363
Province n= 2196
Chart 32
Grade 5
Français
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam by District, Including the
Province
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
80 8174
66 64
74
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
70Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Des Bâtisseurs n= 99
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 20
Anna‐Malenfant n= 183
Saint‐Henri n= 79
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 18
Abbey‐Landry n= 44
Champlain n= 79
District 01 n= 592
Province n= 2196
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 70
37
74
80
78
75
72
82
80
85
88
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Abbey‐Landry
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Champlain
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 33
Ernest‐Lang n= 11
Sainte‐Anne n= 18
Saint‐Joseph n= 20
Régionale Saint‐
Basilen= 28
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 42
Centre d'apprentis‐
sage du Haut‐
Madawaska
Grade 5
Français
District 03 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
n= 23
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerolle*n= 5
72
83
83
80
86
72
100
78
90
Élémentaire Sacré Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle*
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 48
Notre‐Dame n= 47
Grande‐Rivière n= 23
Mgr‐Lang n= 30
Marie‐Immaculée n= 20
Echo Jeunesse n= 21
Mgr‐Martin n= 34
District 03 n= 414
Province n= 2196
Élémentaire Sacré‐
Coeurn= 29
Régional de Saint‐
Andrén= 15
38
74
81
88
86
85
60
53
83
72
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 34
n= 56
n= 37
n= 5
La Croisée
District 05 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveurn= 9
Le Domaine‐
Étudiantn= 57
n= 33
François‐Xavier‐
Daigle
Académie n= 14
n= 19
Séjour‐Jeunesse*
Grade 5
Français
École Carrefour‐
Étudiant
97
57
59
79
82
65
67
68
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse*
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 35
Mgr‐Melanson n= 21
n= 21
n= 10
Arthur‐Pinet n= 13
District 05 n= 367
Province n= 2196
Versant‐Nord
Apollo‐XI
n= 14Domaine‐des‐
Copains
Assomption
39
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 23
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
n= 14
74
74
86
85
100
78
67
81
97
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 35
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 18
Centre la fontaine n= 32
René‐Chouinard n= 14
L'Amitié n= 27
La Source n= 42
La Ruche n= 74
La Passerelle n= 24
L'Envolée n= 50
L'Étincelle n= 9
La‐Rivière n= 11
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 17
Grade 5
Français
District 09
56
68
76
92
55
71
37
64
56
56
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Ola‐léger n= 13
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 12
District 09 n= 460
Province n= 2196
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 34
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 26
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 42
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 15
40
74
66
75
69
60
86
77
62
73
56
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L Étincelle
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 36
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 33
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 27
Donat‐Robichaud n= 35
Grade 5
Français
District 11 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 20
La Marée‐
Montanten= 33
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 14
Grande‐Digue n= 16
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 42
67
81
74
57
63
64
67
64
64
70
Mont Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 12
Camille‐Vautour n= 18
Saint‐Paul* n= 4
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 8
Notre‐Dame n= 12
District 11 n= 363
Province n= 2196
LeBlancn= 42
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 31
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 17
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 41
41
74
64
54
59
75
25
67
67
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul*
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Sciences et technologies exam by school, including the districts and province
42
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 37
District 01 n= 573
District 03 n= 445
District 05 n= 381
District 09 n= 471
District 11 n= 373
Province n= 2243
Chart 38
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam by District,
Including the Province
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
8176
7168
73 74
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
84Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Sainte‐Anne n= 91
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 19
Le Mascaret n= 188
Abbey‐Landry n= 40
District 01 n= 573
Province n= 2243
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 51
43
Carrefour de
l'Acadien= 184
74
81
70
75
84
89
89
84
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Abbey‐Landry
Le Mascaret
Carrefour de l'Acadie
Arc‐en‐ciel
Sainte‐Anne
Champlain
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 39
Ernest‐Lang n= 7
Sainte‐Anne n= 25
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
District 03 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 39
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 21
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 20
Régionale Saint‐n= 36 95
78
65
60
57
95
82
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Joseph n= 22
Saint‐Jacques n= 41
Notre‐Dame n= 48
Grande‐Rivière n= 22
Marie‐Gaétane n= 33
District 03 n= 445
Province n= 2243
Basilen= 36
Thomas‐Albert n= 94
A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 37
44
74
76
58
81
55
80
90
68
95
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Marie‐Gaétane
A.‐J.‐Savoie
Grande‐Rivière
Thomas‐Albert
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 40
N= 86
N= 21
N= 9
N= 43
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
District 05 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Le Domaine‐
ÉtudiantN= 49
École Carrefour‐
ÉtudiantN= 39
François‐Xavier‐
DaigleN= 24
Place‐des‐Jeunes
Roland‐Pépin
La Croisée
Séjour‐Jeunesse
89
81
58
67
67
64
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
Place‐des‐Jeunes
N= 53
Arthur‐Pinet N= 16
District 05 N= 381
N= 2243
Académie Notre‐
DameN= 21
Versant‐Nord
Domaine‐des‐
CopainsN= 20
45
Province
74
71
95
50
81
81
74
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Roland‐Pépin
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 41
n= 17
n= 22
n= 18
n= 15
n= 58
n= 58
n= 29
L'Envolée n= 52
É
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
District 09 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐
Saint‐Isidoren= 20
L'Amitié
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Centre la fontaine
René‐Chouinard
La Source
La Ruche
La Passerelle
75
76
79
64
53
44
73
71
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
Le Tremplin
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
L'Étincelle n= 21
La‐Rivière n= 9
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 36
Ola‐léger n= 15
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 14
District 09 n= 471
Province n= 2243
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 32
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 41
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 14
46
74
68
71
87
64
66
75
50
44
38
77
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 42
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 22
Grande‐Digue n= 30
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 16
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
District 11 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
Secondaire
Assomptionn= 23
La Marée‐
Montanten= 35
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 11
79
74
78
63
55
70
100
60
88
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Donat‐Robichaud n= 37
Mont‐Carmel n= 10
Saint‐Paul* n= 4
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 14
Notre‐Dame n= 19
District 11 n= 373
Province n= 2243
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 33
47
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐
LeBlancn= 27
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 52
Camille‐Vautour n= 24
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 16
74
73
52
88
100
43
71
100
79
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul*
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Mathématiques exam by school, including the districts and province
48
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 43
District 01 n= 573
District 03 n= 447
District 05 n= 386
District 09 n= 452
District 11 n= 374
Province n= 2232
Chart 44
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including
the Province
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
81 79
66 6571 73
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
89Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Sainte‐Anne n= 92
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 19
Le Mascaret n= 186
Abbey‐Landry n= 40
District 01 n= 573
Province n= 2232
n= 53
Carrefour de
l'Acadien= 183
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
49
73
81
75
82
75
79
88
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Abbey‐Landry
Le Mascaret
Carrefour de l'Acadie
Arc‐en‐ciel
Sainte‐Anne
Champlain
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 45
Ernest‐Lang n= 7
Sainte‐Anne n= 25
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
Régionale Saint‐
Basilen= 36
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 20
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 21
District 03
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 39
Grade 8
Mathématiques
73
86
86
70
60
71
95
79
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage …
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Joseph n= 22
Saint‐Jacques n= 41
Notre‐Dame n= 48
Thomas‐Albert n= 94
Grande‐Rivière n= 22
A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 38
Marie‐Gaétane n= 34
District 03 n= 447
Province n= 2232
50
73
79
68
76
73
81
96
73
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Marie‐Gaétane
A.‐J.‐Savoie
Grande‐Rivière
Thomas‐Albert
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 46
Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 86
Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 9
Roland‐Pépin n= 41
Versant‐Nord n= 52
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 24
La Croisée n= 21
District 05
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Le Domaine‐
Étudiantn= 49
École Carrefour‐
Étudiantn= 43
66
100
48
54
70
57
73
Roland‐Pépin
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
Place‐des‐Jeunes
Arthur‐Pinet n= 19
District 05 n= 386
Province n= 2232
51
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 20
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 22
73
66
65
26
77
75
66
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Roland‐Pépin
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Graphique 47
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 17
Centre la fontaine* n= 0
René‐Chouinard n= 18
L'Amitié n= 16
La Source n= 57
Le Tremplin n= 59
La Passerelle n= 28
L'Envolée n= 52
L'Étincelle n= 21
La‐Rivière n= 10
Mathématiques
8e année
District 09
Nombre d'élèves qui
ont écrit l'examen
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 20
Pourcentage d'élèves au niveau acceptable et plus à l'examen de mathématiques 8e année
57
63
70
57
64
72
50
33
65
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
Le Tremplin
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine*
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 38
Ola‐léger n= 14
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 14
District 09 n= 452
Province n= 2232
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 14
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 33
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 41
52
73
65
79
57
64
68
82
64
50
57
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
*Results from this school were not published for exceptional reasons.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 48
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 22
Grande‐Digue n= 29
Donat‐Robichaud n= 37
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 27
La Marée‐
Montanten= 35
Secondaire
Assomptionn= 23
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 16
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
Grade 8
Mathématiques
District 11
72
59
76
76
45
65
100
54
81
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 10
Camille‐Vautour n= 24
Saint‐Paul* n= 4
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 14
Notre‐Dame n= 19
District 11 n= 374
Province n= 2232
LeBlancn= 27
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 54
Blanche‐Bourgeois
53
n= 16
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 33
73
71
36
81
89
79
88
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul*
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Bourgeois
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the Grade 8 Français exam by school, including the districts and province
54
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 49
District 01 n= 570
District 03 n= 444
District 05 n= 380
District 09 n= 470
District 11 n= 370
Province n= 2234
Chart 50
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam by District, Including the
Province
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Grade 8
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
69 68 65
73
56
67
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
72Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Sainte‐Anne n= 91
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 19
Le Mascaret n= 185
Abbey‐Landry n= 40
District 01 n= 570
Province n= 2234
55
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 54
Carrefour de
l'Acadien= 181
67
69
68
68
68
89
70
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Abbey‐Landry
Le Mascaret
Carrefour de l'Acadie
Arc‐en‐ciel
Sainte‐Anne
Champlain
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 51
Ernest‐Lang n= 7
Sainte‐Anne n= 25
n= 36
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Grade 8
Français
District 03
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 39
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 20
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 19
Régionale Saint‐
Basile
70
68
72
74
52
71
70
79
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage …
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Joseph n= 22
Saint‐Jacques n= 40
Notre‐Dame n= 48
Thomas‐Albert n= 95
Grande‐Rivière n= 22
A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 38
Marie‐Gaétane n= 33
District 03 n= 444
Province n= 2234
56
67
68
67
76
41
57
83
70
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Marie‐Gaétane
A.‐J.‐Savoie
Grande‐Rivière
Thomas‐Albert
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 52
Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 83
n= 21
Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 9
Roland‐Pépin n= 41
Versant‐Nord n= 52
Grade 8
Français
District 05
Le Domaine‐
Étudiantn= 48
École Carrefour‐
Étudiant
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 41
La Croisée
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 24
Académie Notre‐n= 22 85
67
62
67
83
54
55
Roland‐Pépin
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
Place‐des‐Jeunes
Arthur‐Pinet n= 19
District 05 n= 380
Province n= 2234
57
Damen= 22
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 20
67
65
55
37
64
73
85
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Roland‐Pépin
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 53
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 17
Centre la fontaine n= 22
René‐Chouinard n= 18
L'Amitié n= 16
La Source n= 58
Le Tremplin n= 58
La Passerelle n= 29
L'Envolée n= 49
L'Étincelle n= 20
La‐Rivière n= 10
Grade 8
Français
District 09 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 20
Number of students who
wrote the exam
45
84
80
76
88
71
50
50
82
47
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
Le Tremplin
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 37
Ola‐léger n= 15
n= 14
District 09 n= 470
Province n= 2234
58
Léandre‐LeGresley
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 33
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 40
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 14
67
73
79
67
57
83
81
67
70
45
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 54
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 22
Grande‐Digue n= 27
Donat‐Robichaud n= 37
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Secondaire
Assomptionn= 23
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 11
n= 27
Grade 8
Français
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 16
La Marée‐
Montanten= 34
62
44
68
59
36
39
68
53
75
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 10
Camille‐Vautour n= 24
Saint‐Paul * n= 4
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 14
Notre‐Dame n= 19
District 11 n= 370
Province n= 2234
59
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 53
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 16
LeBlancn= 27
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 33
67
56
36
63
63
43
58
80
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul *
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Bourgeois
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Elementary school results by sex, including the districts and province
60
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Reading comprehension
Chart 55
District Boys Girls
01 349 347
03 212 224
05 184 166
09 197 185
11 201 174
Province 1143 1096
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Silent Reading Test by Sex and by District, Including the Province
Grade 2
Literacy
Number of students who
wrote the exam
73 7368
72 70 71
8073 70
81 8178
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Oral reading
Chart 56
District Boys Girls
01 347 348
03 212 224
05 184 164
09 197 185
11 201 174
Province 1141 1095
Grade 2
Literacy
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Oral Reading Test by Sex and by District, Including the Province
61
6977
69
79
6772
8375
8288
83 82
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 57
District Boys Girls
01 332 320
03 200 207
05 183 155
09 206 206
11 180 185
Province 1101 1073
Grade 3
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam by Sex and by District, Including
the Province
7782
64
73
64
7378
83
66
75
64
74
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Chart 58
District Boys Girls
01 277 271
03 195 217
05 169 166
09 197 196
11 176 201
Province 1014 1051
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 4
Literacy
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Grade 4 Literacy Assessment by Sex and by District, Including the
Province
62
56
46
6759
38
53
6569
7478
50
67
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 59
District Boys Girls
01 253 346
03 196 225
05 198 186
09 264 213
11 184 189
Province 1095 1159
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Sciences & technologies Exam by Sex and by District,
Including the Province
87
74 72 7074 76
8085
80 78 7580
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Chart 60
District Boys Girls
01 253 346
03 196 225
05 198 186
09 264 213
11 184 189
Province 1095 1159
63
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam by Sex and by District, Including
the ProvinceNumber of students who
wrote the examen
Grade 5
Mathématiques
81 7872 69
74 7581
8579 76 76
80
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 61
District Boys Girls
01 253 346
03 196 224
05 198 186
09 264 213
11 184 187
Province 1095 1156
Grade 5
Français
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by District, Including the
ProvinceNumber of students who
wrote the exam
7370
65
56 5664
8591
8579
73
83
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Chart 62
District Boys Girls
01 273 307
03 214 238
05 216 179
09 230 253
11 203 174
Province 1136 1151
64
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Sciences & technologies Exam by Sex and by District,
Including the Province
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
Number of students who
wrote the examen
7974 72
6771 73
8379
70 68
76 76
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 63
District Boys Girls
01 273 307
03 215 237
05 214 181
09 218 243
11 203 174
Province 1123 1142
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam by Sex and by District, Including
the Province
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
77 76
6561
66 69
84 83
67 68
77 77
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Chart 64
District Boys Girls
01 273 307
03 215 240
05 216 182
09 231 254
11 203 174
Province 1138 1157
65
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by District, Including the
Province
Grade 8 Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
57 56 5661
43
55
7975
68
80
7075
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Garçons Filles
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
66
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chapter 3
Provincial High School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams and
Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.
The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2010-20111 school
67
Chapter 3
Provincial High School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams, andthose enrolled in modified courses writeanother.
The provincial exams also assess ESL OralProficiency in Grade 10.
What is the passing grade?
The final passing grade is 55% for Grade 11Français and Mathématiques. The final gradeconsists of 60% of the school mark and 40%of the provincial exam mark.
Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.
The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2010-20111 schoolyear by combining the results for bothsemesters, except in the case of Grade 11Français, which is a full-year course .
__________________1 January and June results are combined on the premise that the exams given in the two semesters are equivalent. The experts who help develop and correct the provincial examinations ensure that the exams given in the two semesters are as parallel as possible.
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 65Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex
45%
74%
42%
55%
26%
58%
Mathématiques 11
Français 11 (mod.)
Français 11 (rég.)
Provincial exam enrolmentrates by course and sex
Chart 65 clearly shows that boys have atendency to enrol in modified courses. We alsosee that female enrolment rates areconsistently higher in all regular courses.
The gap is especially pronounced in themodified Grade 11 Français course, with boysaccounting for 74% of enrolments and girls for26%. The difference in enrolment rates showsgirls predominant in the following regularcourses: Grade 11 Français (by 16percentage points) and Grade 11Mathématiques (by 10 percentage points)..
68
58%
45%
42%
55%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Mathématiques 11 (mod.)
Mathématiques 11 (rég.)
Percentages
Boys Girls
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 66
Regular level
% of N.B. students enrolled in
regular courses
Grade 11 Mathématiques: 81%
Grade 11 Français: 91%
Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex - Regular Level
67
59
6663
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Ave
rag
e
Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex?
The provincial results (Charts 66 and 67)show that in the regular courses, girlsoutperformed boys in Mathématiques. Maleand female performance was significantlyequal in Français. In the modified courses,girls and boys obtained comparable results inFrançais, whereas the boys outperformed thegirls in Mathématiques.
Chart 67
Modified level
% of N.B. students enrolled in
modified courses
Grade 11 Français: 11%
Grade 11 Mathématiques: 18%
Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex - Modified Level
69
63
58
63
58
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Français 11 Mathématiques 11
Ave
rag
e
Boys Girls
40Français 11 Mathématiques 11
Boys Girls
En français 11e, la moyenne provinciale (garçons et filles combinés) est de 61 % et en mathématiques, de 66 %.The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 63% in Grade 11 Français and 59% in Grade 11 Mathématiques.
The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 59% in Grade 11 Français and60% in Grade 11 Mathématiques .
N.B. .: Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 68
District Boys Girls
01 262 291
03 243 211
05 227 185
09 229 245
11 234 180
Province 1195 1112
Number of students who
were interviewed
Grade 10 English Second Language
Percentage of Students at Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by Sex and District, Including the
Province
96
40
69
38
98
69
96
53
68
43
98
72
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
es
target
Chart 69
70
Percentage of Students at Each ESL Oral Proficiency Level , by Sex, for the Province
1 17
23
33
29
70 0 4
23
3032
10
0
10
20
30
40
Exempté Non cotable Novice De base Intermédiaire Avancé Supérieur
Per
cen
tag
es
Boys Girls
Boys Girls
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Difference between provincial exam average and school mark average
71
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Is there an appreciable difference between the exam marks and theschool marks?
Charts 70 to 81 show that there is often an appreciable difference between provincial exammarks and school marks. This difference is especially pronounced for the regular courses,with school marks being as much as 24 percentage points higher. For a district overall, thegap generally hovers around 14 percentage points. In the modified courses, the differencebetween provincial exam marks and school marks is smaller, hovering around 9 percentagepoints, although it may be as high as 13 percentage points, depending on the course andthe district.
72
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 70
Regular level
District 01 n= 432
District 03 n= 387
District 05 n= 286
District 09 n= 375
District 11 n= 293
Province n= 1773
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Français 11 Averages by District - Regular Level
Grade 11
Français
73 74 76 74 70 73
64 62 62 6257
61
0
20
40
60
80
100
Di t i t 01 Di t i t 03 Di t i t 05 Di t i t 09 Di t i t 11 P i
Per
cen
tag
e
Français 10331 and 10332 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks
The Français curricula are based on a communicative approach, whichexplains why the Français examination consists of two tests, a readingtest and a writing test, each worth 50%. The mark for the writing testincludes a “language” component (60%) and a “discourse andcommunication” component (40%).
Chart 71
Modified level
District 01 n= 43
District 03 n= 42
District 05 n= 17
District 09 n= 51
District 11 n= 32
Province n= 185
Number of students who
wrote the exam
73
Français 11 averagesby District - Modified Level
0District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
School mark Provincial exam
62 62 62 60 61 616156 57 60
5558
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
e
School mark Provincial exam
N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 72
Regular level
Grade 11
Français
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐11,9 percentage
points
Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10331
-21,7
-18,8
-18,8
-16,0
-16,0
-14,1
-13,3
-13,0
-12,9
-12,8
-11,9
-11,9
-11,2
-10,3
-9,5
-9,4
-9,2
-7,7
-6,2
-5,9
-5,7
-1,4
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Clément-Cormier
Carrefour Beausoleil
Thomas-Albert
Louis-Mailloux
Sainte-Anne
Marie-Gaétane
Cité-des-Jeunes
Centre La fontaine
Secondaire Népisiguit
Secondaire Assomption
Province
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
W.-A.-Losier
Samuel-de-Champlain
Mathieu-Martin
Marie-Esther
Roland-Pépin
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Grande-Rivière
L'Odyssée
A.-J.-Savoie
Chart 73
Regular level
74
Difference, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10331
-23,6
21,7
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Aux quatre vents
Rég. de Baie Sainte Anne
Percentage points
-13,6
-13,4
-12,1
-12,0
-11,9
-9,3
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
District 05
District 11
District 03
District 09
Province
District 01
Percentage points
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 74
Modified level
Grade 11
Français
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐3.3 percentage
points
Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10332
-10,6-6,4-6,4
-5,6-4,0-3,5-3,3
-1,5-0,8-0,7
0,27,2
15 10 5 0 5 10
Grande-Rivière**Carrefour Beausoleil**
Sainte-Anne*Thomas-Albert*Marie-Gaétane*
Aux quatre vents*Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne*
Secondaire Assomption*Centre La fontaine*
Samuel-de-Champlain*A.-J.-Savoie*
Clément-CormierLouis-Mailloux
Cité-des-JeunesMgr-M.-F.-Richard
Louis-J.-RobichaudSecondaire Népisiguit
ProvinceRoland-Pépin
Mathieu-MartinL'Odyssée
W.-A.-LosierMarie-Esther
Chart 75
Modified level
75
Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10332
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Percentage points
-6,4
-6,0
-4,3
-3,3
-1,7
-0,3
-10 -5 0 5
District 11
District 03
District 05
Province
District 01
District 09
Percentage points
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** These schools had no students who wrote the modified-level exam
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 76
Regular level
District 01 n= 449
District 03 n= 348
District 05 n= 237
District 09 n= 335
District 11 n= 303
Province n= 1672
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Mathématiques 11 Averagesby District - Regular Level
7771
76 74 76 7570
63 6268 65 66
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
e
Mathématiques 30311 and 30312 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks
In Mathématiques, more than 80% of students write their exam in January, at the end of the first semester of Grade 11. Generally speaking, students display a satisfactory understanding of mathematical concepts and their decontextualized application. The main challenges lie with the problem-solving component, but students are increasingly demonstrating effective solving strategies.
Province n= 1672
Chart 77
Modified level
District 01 n= 61
District 03 n= 112
District 05 n= 35
District 09 n= 145
District 11 n= 49
Province n= 402
76
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Mathématiques 11 Averages, by District, Modified Level
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
School mark Provincial exam
63 6168 66 63 6463 63
56
6657
63
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
e
School mark Provincial exam
N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 78
Regular level
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐8.7 percentage
points
Difference, by School, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30311
-21,6
-14,5
-14,4
-13,2
-12,4
-12,1
-11,8
-11,8
-11,6
-8,7
-8,2
-8,0
-8,0
-7,8
-6,3
-5,7
-4,4
-4,3
-3,8
-0,7
-0,5
1,8
Roland-Pépin*
Aux quatre vents
Clément-Cormier
Thomas-Albert
A.-J.-Savoie
Marie-Gaétane
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Secondaire Népisiguit
Centre La fontaine
Secondaire Assomption
Province
L'Odyssée
Marie-Esther
Louis-Mailloux
Sainte-Anne
Samuel-de-Champlain
Mathieu-Martin
Cité-des-Jeunes
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Grande-Rivière
W.-A.-Losier
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Carrefour Beausoleil
Chart 79
Regular level
77
Difference, by District, between the Provincial Mark Average and the School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30311
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
p
Percentage points
-14,2
-10,4
-8,7
-8,2
-7,0
-6,2
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
District 05
District 11
Province
District 03
District 01
District 09
Percentage points
* The exam was not administered for the first trimester due to exceptionalcircumstances.
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 80
Modified level
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐8.9 percentage
points
Difference, by School, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30312
-13,3
-10,8
-8,9
-8,4
-7,1
-6,6
-3,3
-1,0
0,2
0,5
0,5
1,0
5,0
6,5
6,8
Roland-Pépin**
Centre La fontaine*
Samuel-de-Champlain*
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne*
Carrefour Beausoleil*
Secondaire Assomption*
Grande-Rivière*
Marie-Gaétane*
Secondaire Népisiguit
Clément-Cormier
Province
Marie-Esther
Aux quatre vents
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Louis-Mailloux
L'Odyssée
Mathieu-Martin
Cité-des-Jeunes
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Thomas-Albert
A.-J.-Savoie
W.-A.-Losier
Sainte-Anne
Chart 81
Modified levelDifference, by District, between the Provincial Exam Average and
School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30312
78
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Roland-Pépin**
Percentage points
-12,8
-11,0
-8,9
-8,5
-7,0
-7,0
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
District 05
District 11
Province
District 03
District 09
District 01
Percentage points
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** The exam was not administered for the first trimester due to exceptionalcircumstances.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques by school, including the districts and province
79
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
What is the performance index?
The performance index gives the percentage of students in regular and modified courseswho earned a passing mark on the regular-level examinations. Since one objective of theeducation system is to prepare students for post-secondary studies, it is important that theybe able to pass the regular-level exams. This is an excellent indicator of their level ofpreparedness for post-secondary education.
Sample performance index calculation
Say that 75% of all students at school X are enrolled in the regular Mathématiques course.
Now say that 64% of the students who wrote the regular-level Mathématiques exam passed it .
The performance index is then calculated as follows:
(75 64)/100 = 48
Consequently, it can be said that 48% of all students at school X passed the regular-level Mathématiques exam. The performance index for school X is 48 for the Mathématiques
80
course.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 82
Grade 11
Français
Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Français
67
58
72
73
65
58
69
75
53
64
62
44
64
60
0 20 40 60 80 100
Mathieu-Martin
L'Odyssée
Sainte-Anne
Samuel-de-Champlain
District 01
Marie-Gaétane
A.-J.-Savoie
Grande-Rivière
Thomas-Albert
Cité-des-Jeunes
District 03
Aux-Quatre-Vents
Roland-Pépin
S d i Né i i it
81
60
57
58
62
50
48
55
42
57
46
52
39
90
48
58
Secondaire Népisiguit
District 05
Louis-Mailloux
Marie-Esther
W.-Arthur-Losier
La fontaine
District 09
Clément-Cormier
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Rég. De Baie-Sainte-Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Carrefour Beausoleil
District 11
Province
Percentage points
target
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 83Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Mathématiques
Grade 11
Mathématiques
68
67
73
87
70
33
37
68
47
57
51
45
0 20 40 60 80 100
Mathieu-Martin
L'Odyssée
Sainte-Anne
Samuel-de-Champlain
District 01
Marie-Gaétane
A.-J.-Savoie
Grande-Rivière
Thomas-Albert
Cité-des-Jeunes
District 03
Aux-Quatre-Vents
Roland-Pépin *
82
55
52
63
51
47
50
53
55
49
84
52
78
83
58
57
Roland-Pépin
Secondaire Népisiguit
District 05
Louis-Mailloux
Marie-Esther
W.-Arthur-Losier
Centre La fontaine
District 09
Clément-Cormier
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Rég. De Baie-Sainte-Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Carrefour Beausoleil
District 11
Province
Percentage points
target
* The exam was not administered for the first trimester due to exceptional circumstances.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 84 District and Provincial Performance Indices for Grade 11 Français since 2007
Grade 11
Français
30
40
50
60
70
80
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Perform
ance index
District 01 District 03 District 05
District 09 District 11 Province
Chart 85 District and Provincial Performance Indices for Grade 11 Mathématiques since 2007
83
Grade 11
Mathématiques
30
40
50
60
70
80
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Perform
ance index
District 01 District 03 District 05
District 09 District 11 Province
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province
Second language oral proficiency scale
Novice Able to satisfy immediate needs using rehearsed phrases. No real autonomy of expression, flexibility, or spontaneity. Can ask questions or make statements with reasonable accuracy but only with memorized phrases. Vocabulary is very limited.
Basic Able to create with the language by combining and recombining learned elements. Can satisfy minimum courtesy requirements and maintain very simple face-to-face interaction with native speakers accustomed to dealing with second language learners. Almost every utterance contains fractured syntax and grammatical errors. Vocabulary is adequate to express most elementary needs.
Intermediate* Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in
84
Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in school/work settings. Able to provide autobiographical information in some detail and give explanations with some degree of accuracy, but language is awkward . Able to state facts and narrate, describe, report on and speak of current, past, and future activities. Can give directions from one place to another; can give accurate instructions in a field of personal expertise. Has a speaking vocabulary to converse simply, with some paraphrasing. Accent, though often quite faulty, is intelligible. Uses high-frequency language structures accurately, but does not have a thorough or confident control of grammar. In certain situations, diction would probably distract a native speaker.
* Intermediate is the level expected of students at the end of Grade 10.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
AdvancedAble to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy and vocabulary to participate effectively in most formal and in all informal conversations, on practical, social, and academic or work-related topics. Control of grammar is good and speech is fluent. Can describe in detail and narrate accurately. Can discuss abstract topics and ideas as well as events. Can support opinions and hypothesize. Accent may be obvious but never interferes with understanding. Sporadic errors still occur, but they would not distract a native speaker or interfere with communication.
SuperiorAble to use the language fluently and accurately on all levels normally pertinent to personal situation (academic, social, work-related).Can understand and participate in any conversation with a high degree of fluency and precision of vocabulary.Accent is good, but the speaker would not necessarily be taken for a native speaker.
85
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 86
Sainte‐Anne n=97
L'Odyssée n=185
Mathieu‐Martin n=237
District 01 n=553
Cité‐des‐Jeunes n=261
Thomas‐Albert n=103
Grande‐Rivière n=22
A.‐J.‐Savoie n=38
Marie‐Gaétane n=30
District 03 n=454
Number of students
interviewed:
Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
Grade 10 English
Second Language
n=34
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Proficiency Assessment , at Grade 10, by School
62
69
46
10
13
77
83
38
96
98
95
92
97
Roland-Pépin
Secondaire Népisiguit
District 03
Marie-Gaétane
A.-J.-Savoie
Grande-Rivière
Thomas-Albert
Cité-des-Jeunes
District 01
Mathieu-Martin
L'Odyssée
Sainte-Anne
Samuel-de-Champlain
Secondaire Népisigu n=255
Aux quatre vents n=60
District 05 n=412
Centre La Fontaine n=48
W.‐A.‐Losier n=183
Marie‐Esther n=114
Louis‐Mailloux n=129
District 09 n=474
Carrefour Beausoleil n=17
Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard n=60
Rég. de Baie‐Sainte‐An=13
Clément‐Cormier n=116
District 11 n=414
Province n=2307
86
Roland‐Pépin
Secondaire
Assomption
Louis‐J.‐Robichaud
n=97
n=26
n=182
70
98
97
97
100
100
100
100
40
32
40
34
88
68
78
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Clément-Cormier
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Carrefour Beausoleil
District 09
Louis-Mailloux
Marie-Esther
W.-A.-Losier
Centre La Fontaine
District 05
Aux quatre vents
p
Percentages
cible
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2007
87
Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2007
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 87
2007 2008 2009
School 173 173 188
District 404 451 414
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 191 201
District 444 456
Province 1639 1879
Français
Grade 11
District 01 École Mathieu‐Martin
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 88
2007 2008 2009
School 183 186 189
District 403 464 430
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 204 198
District 464 454
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
88
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 89
2007 2008 2009
School 151 147 137
District 404 451 414
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 137 138
District 444 456
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 École L'Odyssée
Français
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 90
2007 2008 2009
School 137 160 137
District 403 464 430
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 146 145
District 464 454
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
89
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 91
2007 2008 2009
School 59 97 58
District 404 451 414
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 84 90
District 444 456
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 École Sainte‐Anne
Français
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 92
2007 2008 2009
School 60 87 68
District 403 464 430
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 84 83
District 464 454
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
90
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 93
2007 2008 2009
School 21 34 31
District 404 451 414
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 32 27
District 444 456
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 École Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Français
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 94
2007 2008 2009
School 23 31 36
District 403 464 430
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 30 28
District 464 454
Province 1803 1696
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Mathématiques
Grade 11
91
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 95
2007 2008 2009
School 28 41 30
District 433 455 418
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 32 36
District 359 391
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03 École Marie‐Gaétane
Français
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 96
2007 2008 2009
School 22 38 37
District 417 453 426
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 31 34
District 357 349
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
92
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 97
2007 2008 2009
School 51 43 49
District 433 455 418
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 40 44
District 359 391
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03 Polyvalente A.‐J.‐Savoie
Français
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 98
2007 2008 2009
School 45 52 53
District 417 453 426
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 40 38
District 357 349
Province 1803 1696
Number of students who
wrote the exam
93
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 99
2007 2008 2009
School 26 24 17
District 433 455 418
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 15 19
District 359 391
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Français
Grade 11
District 03 École Grande‐Rivière
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 100
2007 2008 2009
School 31 24 16
District 417 453 426
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 13 16
District 357 349
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
94
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 101
2007 2008 2009
School 98 106 98
District 433 455 418
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 86 90
District 359 391
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
Polyvalente Thomas‐Albert
Français
Grade 11
District 03
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 102
2007 2008 2009
School 99 93 95
District 417 453 426
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 90 75
District 357 349
Province 1803 1696
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
95
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 103
2007 2008 2009
School 230 241 224
District 433 455 418
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 186 202
District 359 391
Province 1639 1879
District 03 Cité‐des‐Jeunes A.‐M.‐Sormany
Français
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 104
2007 2008 2009
School 220 246 225
District 417 453 426
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 183 186
District 357 349
Province 1803 1696
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
Mathématiques
Grade 11
96
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 105
2007 2008 2009
School 66 72 49
District 375 348 348
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 63 62
District 128 316
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 05 École Aux quatre vents
Français
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 106
2007 2008 2009
School 78 74 55
District 395 218 372
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 65 61
District 318 252
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
97
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 107
2007 2008 2009
School 72 93 85
District 375 348 348
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 65 75
District 128 316
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 05 Polyvalente Roland‐Pépin*
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
Français
Grade 11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 108
2007 2008 2009
School 83 109 99
District 395 218 372
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 88 2
District 318 252
Province 1803 1696
* Exam was not administer in January 2011 due to exceptional reasons.
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
98
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 109
2007 2008 2009
School 237 183 214
District 375 348 348
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 0 179
District 128 316
Province 1639 1879
District 05 École Secondaire Népisiguit *
Français
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Pourcen
tages
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
* Results were not published for exceptional reasons in 2010.
Regular level
Chart 110
2007 2008 2009
School 234 35 218
District 395 218 372
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 165 189
District 318 252
Province 1803 1696
* The exam was optional in January 2008 because of an exceptional situation.
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
99
Mathématiques
Grade 11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 111
2007 2008 2009
School 124 110 120
District 468 460 435
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 114 125
District 411 402
Province 1639 1879
Français
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
District 09 Polyvalente Louis‐Mailloux
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 112
2007 2008 2009
School 111 117 108
District 415 408 374
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 118 111
District 361 337
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
100
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 113
2007 2008 2009
School 122 120 114
District 468 460 435
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 115 106
District 411 402
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
District 09 École Marie‐Esther
Français
Grade 11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 114
2007 2008 2009
School 102 111 110
District 415 408 374
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 91 102
District 361 337
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
101
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 115
2007 2008 2009
School 179 196 165
District 468 460 435
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 148 147
District 411 402
Province 1639 1879
District 09 Polyvalente W.‐Arthur‐Losier
Français
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 116
2007 2008 2009
School 158 149 116
District 415 408 374
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 119 99
District 361 337
Province 1803 1696
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
102
Mathématiques
Grade 11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 117
2007 2008 2009
School 43 34 36
District 468 460 435
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 34 24
District 411 402
Province 1639 1879
District 09 Centre scolaire‐communautaire La Fontaine
Français
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 118
2007 2008 2009
School 44 31 40
District 415 408 374
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 33 25
District 361 337
Province 1803 1696
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
103
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 119
2007 2008 2009
School 115 96 105
District 347 312 346
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 107 108
District 297 314
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 11 École Clément‐Cormier
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
Français
Grade 11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 120
2007 2008 2009
School 117 99 112
District 369 331 354
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 109 103
District 303 304
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
104
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 121
2007 2008 2009
School 137 120 134
District 347 312 346
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 106 92
District 297 314
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
District 11 École Louis‐J.‐Robichaud
Français
Grade 11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 122
2007 2008 2009
School 141 127 134
District 369 331 354
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 109 109
District 303 304
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
105
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 123
2007 2008 2009
School 9 12 9
District 347 312 346
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 6 22
District 297 314
Province 1639 1879
District 11 École Régionale de Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Français
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 124
2007 2008 2009
School 11 10 9
District 369 331 354
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 11 18
District 303 304
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
106
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 125
2007 2008 2009
School 21 23 23
District 347 312 346
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 16 21
District 297 314
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
District 11 École Secondaire Assomption
Français
Grade 11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 126
2007 2008 2009
School 24 26 28
District 369 331 354
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 18 22
District 303 304
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
107
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 127
2007 2008 2009
School 57 51 65
District 347 312 346
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 55 61
District 297 314
Province 1639 1879
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Français
Grade 11
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
District 11 École Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 128
2007 2008 2009
School 65 57 61
District 369 331 354
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 49 42
District 303 304
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
108
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 129
2007 2008 2009
School 8 10 10
District 347 312 346
Province 2027 2026 1961
2010 2011
School 7 10
District 297 314
Province 1639 1879
District 11 École Carrefour Beausoleil
Français
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 130
2007 2008 2009
School 11 12 10
District 369 331 354
Province 1999 1874 1956
2010 2011
School 7 10
District 303 304
Province 1803 1696
Mathématiques
Grade 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
109
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2007
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level
110
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 4 12 189 91 75 65 76 71 98 67 18 9 185 86 70 64 75 67 95 61
L'Odyssée 1 8 130 87 69 63 71 67 96 58 2 2 135 86 71 64 73 68 93 58
Sainte-Anne 0 1 89 96 75 61 76 70 98 72 1 1 83 92 74 62 68 69 98 62
Samuel-de-Champlain 2 3 24 92 77 68 81 73 100 73 1 1 32 100 72 64 78 69 97 74
District 01 7 24 432 91 73 64 75 70 97 65 22 13 435 88 71 64 73 68 95 61Marie-Gaétane 1 0 36 97 73 59 64 67 100 58 3 0 32 91 69 65 69 68 88 59
A.-J.-Savoie 0 0 44 90 65 64 77 65 75 69 1 0 40 98 68 63 73 66 85 69
Grande-Rivière 0 0 19 100 68 62 79 66 95 75 0 0 15 94 69 59 67 65 87 63
Thomas-Albert 3 0 90 95 73 57 59 66 95 53 3 0 86 83 74 57 56 68 91 46
Cité-des-Jeunes 9 4 198 86 77 64 75 72 95 64 7 3 183 85 76 64 73 71 97 61
District 03 13 4 387 90 74 62 71 69 93 62 14 3 356 87 74 62 68 69 93 58Aux quatre vents 2 10 52 96 79 55 50 71 97 44 2 3 60 92 77 61 62 71 98 52
Roland-Pépin 5 5 70 92 71 63 72 68 92 64 7 2 65 89 70 61 63 67 87 51
Secondaire Népisiguit ** 4 15 164 95 76 64 69 71 95 60 0 - - - 77 - - - - -
Final Mark*
% PassFinal Mark
Perfor-mance Index
No. of Absen-
tees
% of Students in This Level
SchoolMark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
No. of Atten-dees
No. of Absen-
tees
No. of Atten-dees
% of Students in This Level
SchoolMark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
% PassFinal Mark
Perfor-mance Index
No of exemp-
tions
No of exemp-
tions
Français Grade 11 (regular level)2010-2011
Français Grade 11 (regular level)2009-2010
p g
District 05 11 30 286 94 76 62 66 70 95 57 9 12 125 74 76 61 63 72 96 52Louis-Mailloux 6 10 115 93 79 63 67 73 98 58 5 1 113 89 76 61 65 71 97 51
Marie-Esther 2 5 101 88 72 63 73 68 91 62 7 7 109 91 70 65 77 68 96 67
W.-A.-Losier 2 11 136 85 71 60 61 67 86 50 4 0 148 86 74 62 68 69 89 57
Centre La Fontaine 2 1 23 82 71 58 58 66 96 48 1 0 34 87 63 58 56 61 77 45
District 09 12 27 375 88 74 62 66 69 92 55 17 8 404 88 73 62 69 69 92 57Clément-Cormier 4 6 102 92 73 54 46 66 91 42 9 5 105 90 71 54 42 65 89 35
Louis-J.-Robichaud 3 6 86 87 67 61 67 64 84 57 1 2 105 81 69 62 75 66 95 59
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 0 22 96 75 54 50 67 95 46 0 1 5 83 79 62 67 72 100 57
Secondaire Assomption 1 1 20 91 71 59 57 66 95 52 1 2 15 71 70 60 56 66 94 38
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 8 53 88 67 56 44 63 82 39 0 5 50 94 66 56 45 62 73 42
Carrefour Beausoleil 0 0 10 100 84 65 90 77 100 90 0 0 7 70 83 62 86 74 100 55
District 11 8 21 293 90 70 57 54 65 88 48 11 15 287 85 70 58 57 65 89 46
Province 51 106 1773 91 73 61 67 69 93 58 73 51 1607 86 73 62 67 69 93 56
* Passing grade: 55 %** Results were not published for exceptional reasons.
111
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 0 8 18 9 63 62 50 62 100 2 11 29 14 64 57 46 62 92
L'Odyssée 1 11 19 13 61 61 43 61 97 1 10 22 14 65 59 41 63 94
Sainte-Anne** 0 1 4 - - - - - - 1 0 7 8 58 52 43 56 71
Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 1 2 - - - - - - 0 1 0 - - - - - -
District 01 1 21 43 9 62 61 47 62 98 4 22 58 12 64 57 43 62 91Marie-Gaétane ** 0 2 1 - - - - - - 1 1 3 - - - - - -
A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 0 5 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - - - - -
Grande-Rivière ** 1 0 0 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - - - - -
Thomas-Albert** 4 0 5 - - - - - - 1 0 17 17 63 52 29 58 88
Cité-des-Jeunes 0 1 31 14 63 57 59 61 97 1 0 32 15 62 58 69 61 97
District 03 5 3 42 10 62 56 53 60 93 3 1 54 13 63 55 53 60 91Aux quatre vents** 0 7 2 - - - - - - 0 6 5 8 62 59 27 61 82
Roland-Pépin 0 4 6 8 61 59 50 62 90 4 3 8 11 67 58 67 64 100
Secondaire Népisiguit 0 21 9 5 59 55 13 58 73 2 6 31 100 66 57 59 63 97
% PassFinal Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
SchoolMark
No. of Absen-
tees
No. of Atten-dees
% of Students in This Level
SchoolMark
% of Students in This Level
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
% PassFinal Mark
No. of Absen-
tees
No. of Atten-dees
No of exemp-
tions
No of exemp-
tions
Français Grade 11 (modified level)2010-2011
Français Grade 11 (modified level)2009-2010
p g
District 05 0 32 17 6 62 57 20 61 82 6 15 44 26 65 57 54 63 95Louis-Mailloux 0 9 9 7 68 62 44 67 100 4 12 14 11 65 57 38 64 96
Marie-Esther 2 2 14 12 57 64 88 60 100 1 4 11 9 55 61 64 57 67
W.-A.-Losier 1 8 24 15 57 57 50 57 71 2 2 24 14 57 52 27 55 56
Centre La Fontaine ** 0 0 5 - - - - - - 0 0 5 - - - - - -
District 09 3 19 52 12 60 60 56 60 86 7 18 54 12 59 55 39 59 72Clément-Cormier 0 2 9 8 62 51 27 59 80 3 8 12 10 60 52 12 59 84
Louis-J.-Robichaud 2 1 13 13 62 58 50 60 100 0 2 25 19 59 53 41 57 85
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 1 1 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - ‐ - - -
Secondaire Assomption ** 0 0 2 - - - - - - 0 0 6 29 61 58 67 60 83
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 2 7 12 58 53 33 57 78 0 0 3 - - - - - -
Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 0 0 - - - - - - 0 1 3 - - - - - -
District 11 2 6 32 10 61 55 37 59 89 3 11 50 15 60 53 34 58 83
Province 4 81 186 9 61 58 44 61 90 23 67 260 14 62 56 44 60 86
* Passing grade: 55 %
112
** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the restuls for the district and province.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 2 2 196 84 77 72 83 75 96 68 3 0 204 84 72 68 74 71 91 60
L'Odyssée 1 2 143 90 75 67 76 72 98 67 6 0 146 90 76 64 60 71 95 53
Sainte-Anne 2 0 83 92 80 72 80 77 99 73 2 0 84 93 80 70 77 76 99 70
Samuel-de-Champlain 0 1 27 93 82 76 93 79 100 87 1 0 30 97 83 76 83 80 100 81
District 01 5 5 449 88 77 70 81 75 98 70 12 0 464 88 76 68 70 73 94 61Marie-Gaétane 1 1 33 89 69 57 41 67 76 33 0 0 31 91 78 57 52 69 90 46
A.-J.-Savoie 0 0 38 84 69 55 45 63 82 37 1 1 39 93 77 48 23 66 95 21
Grande-Rivière 0 0 16 84 69 65 81 67 81 68 0 0 13 81 70 61 62 66 92 50
Thomas-Albert 0 0 75 77 73 58 61 67 93 47 2 0 90 87 75 56 43 67 92 36
Cité-des-Jeunes 3 0 186 71 71 67 81 70 89 57 8 1 182 74 74 62 53 70 86 38
District 03 4 1 348 76 71 63 69 68 87 51 11 2 355 80 75 58 47 69 89 37Aux quatre vents 4 7 54 87 79 57 54 71 92 45 6 2 63 81 78 59 45 71 93 35
Roland-Pépin** 3 1 1 - - - - - - - 5 0 88 79 67 59 49 64 81 38
Secondaire Népisiguit 1 7 182 87 76 64 68 71 93 55 4 2 163 76 75 62 56 70 95 42
% PassFinal Mark
Perfor-mance Index
% Pass Exam
No. of Atten-dees
No. of Absen-
tees
Mathématiques Grade 11 (regular level)2010-2011
Mathématiques Grade 11 (regular level)2009-2010
Final Mark*
% PassFinal Mark
Perfor-mance Index
No. of Absen-
tees
% of Students in This Level
SchoolMark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
No of exemp-
tions
No of exemp-
tions
No. of Atten-dees
% of Students in This Level
SchoolMark
Prov. Exam Mark
p g
District 05 8 15 237 87 76 62 64 71 93 52 15 4 314 78 74 60 52 69 90 40Louis-Mailloux 4 0 111 78 77 70 86 75 94 63 3 1 117 72 76 65 74 72 93 52
Marie-Esther 3 0 102 73 74 66 71 71 95 51 5 0 91 76 78 59 55 71 93 42
W.-A.-Losier 3 2 97 57 70 69 83 70 97 47 8 0 119 64 70 64 62 68 91 36
Centre La Fontaine 2 0 25 89 72 60 56 67 72 50 1 0 33 80 78 56 48 69 97 39
District 09 12 2 335 70 74 68 78 72 94 53 17 1 360 71 75 62 63 70 93 43Clément-Cormier 0 0 103 87 79 65 65 73 97 55 9 0 109 89 74 58 47 68 91 40
Louis-J.-Robichaud 4 1 108 84 74 62 60 70 92 49 4 0 109 77 75 68 69 72 95 52
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 0 18 95 73 69 89 71 94 84 1 0 11 85 73 63 60 69 100 46
Secondaire Assomption 1 0 22 88 75 63 59 72 95 52 0 0 18 95 75 60 56 69 78 50
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 0 42 86 72 72 90 72 95 78 2 0 49 80 72 64 67 69 96 54
Carrefour Beausoleil 0 0 10 83 74 76 100 75 100 83 0 0 7 88 82 75 86 79 100 75
District 11 5 1 303 86 76 65 69 72 95 58 16 0 303 83 74 63 60 70 93 48
Province 34 24 1672 81 75 66 73 72 93 57 71 7 1796 80 75 63 59 70 92 46
* Passing grade: 55 %** Results were not published for exceptional reasons.
113
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 2 5 36 16 63 63 68 64 88 6 2 38 16 68 60 60 65 86
L'Odyssée 1 1 16 10 62 61 71 62 100 0 1 17 10 61 59 56 60 83
Sainte-Anne 0 0 7 8 60 67 86 62 100 1 0 6 7 65 55 67 61 100
Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 0 2 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - - - - -
District 01 3 6 61 12 63 63 70 63 93 7 3 62 12 66 59 60 63 87Marie-Gaétane ** 0 0 4 - - - - - - 1 0 3 - - - - - -
A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 0 7 - - - - - - 0 0 3 - - - - - -
Grande-Rivière ** 0 0 3 - - - - - - 0 0 3 - - - - - -
Thomas-Albert 0 0 22 23 61 62 82 61 95 3 1 14 13 71 60 53 67 100
Cité-des-Jeunes 1 0 76 29 64 64 83 64 92 6 0 63 26 67 62 73 65 94
District 03 1 0 112 24 61 63 79 62 89 10 1 86 20 67 61 68 65 94Aux quatre vents 1 3 8 13 64 57 36 65 91 0 1 15 19 65 55 38 61 81
Roland-Pépin*** 0 0 0 - - - - - - 1 0 23 21 73 57 57 67 92
Secondaire Népisiguit 0 16 27 13 70 56 40 66 90 1 1 52 24 68 57 53 64 91
% Pass Exam
No of exemp-
tionsSchoolMark
Prov. Exam Mark
% PassFinal Mark
No. of Atten-dees
% of Students in This Level
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
No. of Absen-
tees
Mathématiques Grade 11 (modified level)2009-2010
Mathématiques Grade 11 (modified level)2010-2011
No of exemp-
tions
No. of Atten-dees
% of Students in This Level
SchoolMark
Prov. Exam Mark
Final Mark*
% PassFinal Mark
No. of Absen-
tees
p g
District 05 1 19 35 13 68 56 39 65 91 2 2 90 22 69 56 51 64 89Louis-Mailloux 1 2 32 22 68 65 76 67 94 3 2 45 28 75 61 70 70 98
Marie-Esther 0 0 37 27 69 60 78 66 95 2 0 29 24 69 57 69 64 86
W.-A.-Losier 2 1 73 43 63 69 88 66 88 11 5 67 36 58 62 69 61 81
Centre La Fontaine ** 0 0 3 - - - - - - 0 0 8 20 65 53 38 60 88
District 09 3 3 145 30 66 66 83 66 91 16 7 149 29 65 60 68 64 88Clément-Cormier 2 0 16 13 70 59 75 67 94 1 0 14 11 61 57 50 60 86
Louis-J.-Robichaud 0 0 20 16 59 52 30 56 70 2 0 32 23 68 57 50 64 84
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 0 1 - - - - - - 0 0 2 - - - - - -
Secondaire Assomption ** 0 0 3 - - - - - - 1 0 1 - - - - - -
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 0 7 14 56 57 57 57 86 0 0 12 20 61 60 83 61 100
Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 0 2 - - - - - - 0 0 1 - - - - - -
District 11 2 0 49 14 63 57 57 61 84 4 0 62 17 64 59 60 62 89
Province 10 28 402 19 64 63 72 64 90 39 13 449 20 66 59 62 64 89* Passing grade: 55 %
114
** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the restuls for the district and province.*** Results were not published for exceptional reasons.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 8 237 0,0 0,0 0,4 1,3 23,2 57,4 17,7 13 235 0,0 0,9 0,0 2,1 20,4 55,3 21,3
L'Odyssée 5 185 1,1 0,0 0,5 3,2 23,8 51,9 19,5 1 177 0,0 0,0 0,6 5,6 13,6 60,5 19,8
Sainte-Anne 6 97 0,0 0,0 1,0 7,2 14,4 30,9 46,4 4 108 0,0 1,9 0,0 2,8 16,7 38,0 40,7
Samuel-de-Champlain 5 34 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,9 8,8 11,8 76,5 0 49 4,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,1 26,5 63,3
District 01 24 553 0,4 0,0 0,5 3,1 21,0 48,1 26,9 18 569 0,4 0,7 0,2 3,2 16,3 51,1 28,1
Marie-Gaétane 3 30 26,7 0,0 10,0 53,3 6,7 3,3 0,0 0 32 0,0 3,1 18,8 59,4 18,8 0,0 0,0
A.-J.-Savoie 0 38 0,0 0,0 2,6 84,2 13,2 0,0 0,0 1 50 0,0 0,0 0,0 32,0 64,0 4,0 0,0
Grande-Rivière 1 22 9,1 0,0 0,0 13,6 59,1 13,6 4,5 0 23 0,0 0,0 0,0 52,2 34,8 13,0 0,0
Thomas-Albert 3 103 0,0 0,0 3,9 12,6 47,6 33,0 2,9 1 91 0,0 0,0 2,2 34,1 44,0 18,7 1,1
Cité-des-Jeunes 6 261 1,5 0,4 13,8 46,4 27,2 10,0 0,8 9 239 0,4 0,0 11,3 53,1 25,1 9,6 0,4
District 03 13 454 3,1 0,2 9,7 40,7 30,8 14,1 1,3 11 435 0,2 0,2 8,0 47,1 33,6 10,3 0,5
Aux quatre vents 1 60 0,0 0,0 6,7 15,0 45,0 30,0 3,3 0 72 0,0 0,0 4,2 27,8 31,9 27,8 8,3
Roland-Pépin 4 97 1,0 2,1 5,2 29,9 41,2 17,5 3,1 2 89 1,1 0,0 0,0 33,7 48,3 14,6 2,2
Secondaire Népisiguit 11 255 0,0 0,8 5,1 25,5 42,7 23,5 2,4 6 246 0,0 0,8 3,3 22,0 46,7 24,4 2,8
District 05 16 412 0,2 1,0 5,3 25,0 42,7 23,1 2,7 8 407 0,2 0,5 2,7 25,6 44,5 22,9 3,7
Louis-Mailloux 3 129 1,6 0,0 11,6 55,0 24,0 6,2 1,6 8 140 0,0 0,0 13,6 62,1 19,3 5,0 0,0
Novice
No. of Atten-dees
ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) 2010-2011
ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) 2009-2010
No. of Atten-dees
Inter-mediateBasicNoviceUnratable SuperiorAdvancedExemptedExempted
No. of Absen-
tees Superior
No. of Absen-
teesBasic
Inter-mediate AdvancedUnratable
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Marie-Esther 6 114 0,0 0,9 14,9 43,9 29,8 10,5 0,0 4 150 0,0 2,0 22,7 52,7 16,7 6,0 0,0
W.-A.-Losier 4 183 0,5 3,3 12,0 50,3 28,4 5,5 0,0 5 182 0,0 2,2 9,3 53,8 29,1 5,5 0,0
Centre La Fontaine 4 48 0,0 0,0 2,1 10,4 50,0 33,3 4,2 1 37 0,0 0,0 2,7 18,9 48,6 27,0 2,7
District 09 17 474 0,6 1,5 11,6 46,0 29,7 9,7 0,8 18 509 0,0 1,4 13,9 53,2 24,2 7,1 0,2
Clément-Cormier 2 116 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,6 50,0 44,0 3,4 3 127 0,8 0,0 0,0 6,3 55,9 34,6 2,4
Louis-J.-Robichaud 4 182 0,5 0,0 0,0 2,2 37,9 54,9 4,4 4 124 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,8 43,5 46,8 4,8
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 13 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 23,1 76,9 0,0 1 22 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 18,2 81,8 0,0
Secondaire Assomption 0 26 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 26,9 73,1 0,0 2 29 3,4 0,0 0,0 3,4 27,6 58,6 6,9
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 1 60 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 36,7 61,7 1,7 3 83 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,6 48,2 44,6 3,6
Carrefour Beausoleil 0 17 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 11,8 58,8 29,4 0 12 0,0 0,0 0,0 16,7 25,0 33,3 25,0
District 11 7 414 0,2 0,0 0,0 1,7 38,9 54,8 4,3 13 397 0,5 0,0 0,0 5,0 45,3 44,8 4,3
Province 77 2307 0,9 0,5 5,4 23,0 31,8 30,3 8,1 68 2317 0,3 0,6 5,1 26,7 31,2 27,8 8,4
115
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
116
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Chapter 4
Results of Pan-Canadian and International Assessments
Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs
What are SAIP and PCAP?1
The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education Canada
Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?
Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories through CMEC developed SAIP
117
Chapter 4
Results of Pan-Canadian and International Assessments
Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs
What are SAIP and PCAP?1
The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education, Canada(CMEC) between 1993 and 2004. The Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) hassince then replaced SAIP. The first PCAPassessment took place in the spring of 2007.PCAP will continue to assess performance inthe same three core subjects as SAIP but willhave room for other subjects to be added asthe need arises.
_______________1 CMEC (2006). The Pan-Canadian AssessmentProgram (PCAP) and the School AchievementIndicators Program (SAIP). Taken on December 11,2006 from http://www.cmec.ca/pcap/indexe.stm .
Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?
Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories, through CMEC, developed SAIPand then PCAP to assess the performance ofstudents in mathematics, reading, andscience. Three cycles of pan-Canadianassessments have been conducted since1993. The information revealed in eachassessment, together with the reviewmechanisms of individual jurisdictions, hasgiven ministers of education a basis forexamining their curriculum and other aspectsof their school system.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP?
At its 83rd meeting (held on April 2, 2003, inLondon, Ontario), CMEC approved thedevelopment of PCAP to replace SAIP. Theneed for a new pan-Canadian program thatwould reflect changes made in jurisdictionalcurricula within the past decade had becomeapparent in Canadian provinces andterritories. PCAP also recognizes theincreased jurisdictional emphasis now placedon international assessments. It assessesperformance in reading, science, andmathematics, and will have room for othersubjects as the need arises. PCAP assesses13-year-old students and enables provincesand territories to improve their ownassessments and validate their resultsagainst national and international results.
What is PISA?2
The Program for International Student
The assessment covers three domains:reading, mathematics, and science. Althougheach assessment has questions from all threedomains, the focus shifts with eachassessment. In 2000 and 2009 the focus wason reading, in 2003 on mathematics, and in2006 on science. In 2003, an assessment ofproblem-solving skills was also conducted.
In Canada, the first PISA assessment tookplace in April and May 2000 at the same timeas the Youth in Transition Survey (YITS) foryouth aged 15. The second assessment wasconducted in 2003.
Who participates in PISA?
Although the samples in most countries arebetween 4,000 and 10,000 students, inCanada, over 23,000 students are tested,which allows results to be produced at theprovincial level.
The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading
118
The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA) is an internationalassessment of the skills and knowledge of15-year-olds. The study is being directed bythe Organization for Economic Co-operationand Development (OECD) and involves over69 countries. As the study will be repeated inother years, it will continue to produce resultsthat can be compared internationally .
_______________2CMEC (2006). The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA). Taken on December 11, 2006 fromhttp://www.cmec.ca/pisa/indexe.stm .
The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading,mathematics, and science, as well as variousquestionnaires to gather general informationabout the students and their schools.
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
How are students selected? (PISA)
About 1,000 schools across Canada arerandomly selected to participate in PISA andYITS. In these schools, a random selection ismade of 15-year-old students to determinewho will participate.
How is the information used? (PISA)
Because PISA is an international studyinvolving over 69 countries, it provides aunique examination of the levels ofachievement of 15-year-olds around theworld. It gives a clear indication of thepreparedness of these students as theycontinue in their studies and enter the workforce. It is able to address questions such as :
How well are young adults prepared tomeet the challenges of the future?
Results from PISA are invaluable toeducators, social policy analysts, and humanrights advocacy groups. These researchersand analysts have access to importantinformation that can be used in developingprograms to deal with both short-term andlong-term problems or barriers that youngadults may face in their pursuit of highereducation or in gaining work experience.Information from the survey helps to evaluatethe effectiveness of existing programs andpractices, to determine the most appropriateage at which to introduce new programs, andto better target programs to those most inneed .
Young adults themselves are able to see howtheir own experiences compare with those ofother young adults.
119
meet the challenges of the future?
Are they able to analyze, reasonand communicate their ideaseffectively?
Are some kinds of school policiesand practices more effective thanothers?
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Average scores and confidence intervals, by provinceand country, for each PCAP 2010 domain
Mathematics as primary domain
The mathematics component of PCAP 2010 is alinged on the jurisdictions' curricula and onthe National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Regardless of the terms used todefine mathematics, curricula across Canada are structured to enable students “to usemathematics in his or her personal life, in the workplace, and in further study.
The PCAP mathematics domain is divided into four strands or subdomains asdescribed below:
• numbers and operations (properties, equivalent representations, and magnitude);• geometry and measurement (properties of 2-D figures and 3-D shapes, relative
position, transformations, and measurement);• patterns and relationships (patterns and algebraic expressions, linear relations, and
equations); and• data management and probability (data collection and analysis, experimental and
theoretical probability).
These subdomains in turn involve the five processes listed below:
• problem solving
120
• problem solving• communication• representation• reasoning and proof• connections
Performance descriptors for scores at each level of thegeneral scale
Level 1 scores (357 and below)Students at this level were able to solve problems at a low cognitive level that weredetermined to be fairly easy questions. Typically, at this level, students were able to retrieveinformation from a graph or solve previously learned routine problems. At this level,students could solve problems that required mostly recalland recognition.
Level 2 scores (358 to 513)Students at this level were required to recall facts, definitions, or terms and carry outpreviously learned procedures such as performing one or more operations, employingformulae, evaluating a variable expression, retrieving information from a table or a graphand applying it to solve a problem.
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Typically, students at this level were able to identify a simple number of geometric patterns.Students were able to solve problems that were clearly defined as to what was required,with no extraneous information or hidden assumptions. At this level, students could solveproblems that were mostly of low and moderate cognitive demand.
Level 3 scores (514 to 668)Students at this level were able to apply what they know to new situations, identify hiddenassumptions, and distinguish between relevant and irrelevant information needed to solvea problem. They had to select appropriate procedures or strategies to solve a problem andsometimes had to apply skills from different domains to solve problems. Students at thislevel were able to represent a problem in different ways and use informal reasoning to solveproblems. At this level students could solve problems that were mostly of moderate to highcognitive demand.
Level 4 scores (669 and above)Students at this level were able to solve problems that require complex reasoning at theanalysis and synthesis levels. Solutions clearly show a mastery of the appropriateconceptual and procedural knowledge necessary to solve complex problems. Students wereable to generalize a pattern and write the rule algebraically. They were also able to explainor justify their solutions and strategies clearly. At this level, students could solve problemsthat were generally of high cognitive demand and determined to be difficult questions.
Reading assessment
The reading framework statement for PCAP 2010 has not been altered from that used to
121
The reading framework statement for PCAP 2010 has not been altered from that used todefine reading performance in the 2007 assessment in which reading was the majordomain. This enables comparisons over time between the two cohorts. According tocurricula across Canada, reading is a dynamic, interactive process whereby the readerconstructs meaning from texts. The process of reading effectively involves the interaction ofreader, text, purpose, and context before, during, and after reading.
In light of the interactive process linking the reader, text, purpose, and context, thisassessment of the domain of reading considers the reader’s engagement with the text andhis or her response to it. Language arts curricula across Canada identify comprehension,interpretation, and response and reflection as major organizing aspects of reading literacy.In this assessment, three subdomains of the integrated process of reading are assessed:comprehension, interpretation, and response to text (which includes response andreflection).
Comprehension: Students understand the explicit and implicit information provided by the text. In particular, they understand the vocabulary, parts, elements, and events of the text.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Interpretation: Students make meaning by analyzing and synthesizing the parts/elements/events to develop a broader perspective and/or meaning for the text. They may identifytheme/thesis and support that with references to details, events, symbols, patterns, and/or text features.
Response to text: In responding, the readers engage with the text in many ways: bymaking personal connections between aspects of the text and their own real/vicarious/prior experiences, knowledge, values and/or point of view; by responding emotionally tocentral ideas or aspects of the text; and/or by taking an evaluative stance about the qualityor value of the text, possibly in relation to other texts and/or social or cultural factors.
Science assessment
The concept of “scientific literacy” is generally accepted as the overarching goal of sciencecurricula across Canada. The PCAP science assessment is founded on a definition ofscientific literacy that advocates that students’ evolving competencies in applying science-related attitudes, skills, and knowledge, as well as an understanding of the nature ofscience, enable them to conduct inquiries, solve problems, and make evidence-baseddecisions about science-related issues. Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy isthe supposition that students have knowledge of the life sciences, physical sciences(chemistry and physics), and Earth and space sciences, as well as an understanding of thenature of science as a human endeavour.
As reflected in most science curriculum documents across Canadian provinces andterritories, three competencies are associated with demonstrating scientific literacy: science
122
territories, three competencies are associated with demonstrating scientific literacy: scienceinquiry, problem solving, and decision making. Each of these competencies requiresunderstanding the nature of science, applying relevant scientific knowledge, using skillsrequired for scientific and technological inquiry, and demonstrating attitudes as a reflectionof scientific literacy. For the purposes of PCAP 2010, all of these are considered interrelatedand mutually supportive. Additionally, one of the purposes of PCAP as identified by CMECwas to align itself with international assessments such as the Organisation for EconomicCo-operation and Development’s (OECD) Programme for International StudentAssessment. Adopting a similar definition of scientific literacy enhances the possibility offinding some areas of comparability between the two assessments.
Reporting scales for the minor domains
As was the case for reading, one mean scale score for each of the minor domains has beenused for reporting the achievement results. The pan-Canadian mean score was set at 500with a standard deviation of 100.
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Chart 131
PCAP (2010) Mathematics
Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Language
498
500
503
504
504
507
507
507
511
515
516
Saskatchewan (F)
Canada
Nova Scotia (F)
British Columbia (F)
Alberta (F)
Quebec (E)
New Brunswick (F)
Ontario (E)
Ontario (F)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Ranking of jurisdictions on PCAP (2007) MathematicsAssessment
123
460
466
467
468
472
473
474
480
481
495
495
400 425 450 475 500 525 550
Prince Edward Island (E)
New Brunswick (E)
Manitoba (E)
Yukon (E)
Newfoundland and Labrador (E)
Nove Scotia (E)
Saskatchewan (E)
Manitoba (F)
British Columbia (E)
Alberta (E)
Canada (E)
( )
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Chart 132
PCAP (2010) Mathematics
Distribution (%) of Performance Levels in Reading by Language
9
9
9
10
11
12
12
13
13
14
16
45
47
58
55
50
52
53
56
58
53
50
43
41
31
33
37
34
32
30
29
30
33
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
1
0
3
1
Saskatchewan (F)
Canada (E)
Manitoba (F)
Saskatchewan (E)
British Columbia (E)
Newfoundland and Labrador (E)
Nove Scotia (E)
New Brunswick (E)
Prince Edward Island (E)
Yukon (E)
Manitoba (E)
Percentage of Students by Performance Level on PCAP
124
4
5
6
7
7
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
50
46
43
47
50
38
38
43
42
42
45
45
44
46
46
44
40
50
50
45
45
44
43
43
2
3
5
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
3
3
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Alberta (F)
British Columbia (F)
Ontario (F)
Nova Scotia (F)
Alberta (E)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Ontario (E)
New Brunswick (F)
Quebec (E)
Canada
Saskatchewan (F)
Niveau 1 (%) Niveau 2 (%)Niveau 3 (%) Niveau 4 (%)
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Chart 133
PCAP (2010) Mathematics
518
465
476
499
500
503
504
479
489
496
500
511
513
Canada (F)
New Brunswick (E)
New Brunswick
Canada (E)
Canada
New Brunswick (F)
Canada (F)
New Brunswick (E)
Nouveau-Brunswick
Canada (E)
Canada
Canada (F)
New Brunswick (F)
Pat
tern
s an
d R
elat
ions
hips
Dat
a m
anag
emen
t and
P
roba
bilit
y
Results by Mathematics Subdomain and by Language atPCAP (2010) for Canada and New Brunswick Sectors
125
479
494
500
507
519
520
457
472
494
500
508
400 425 450 475 500 525 550
New Brunswick (E)
Canada (E)
Canada
New Brunswick (F)
Canada (F)
New Brunswick
New Brunswick (E)
New Brunswick
Canada (E)
Canada
New Brunswick (F)
Num
bers
and
Ope
ratio
nsG
eom
atriy
and
M
easu
rem
ent
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PCAP (2010) Mathematics
Chart 134
477
478
481
486
490
491
499
500
504
508
509
513
523
Saskatchewan (M)
Nova Scotia (F)
Yukon (M)
New Brunswick (F)
British Columbia (M)
Alberta (F)
Canada (F)
Alberta (M)
Canada (M)
Ontario (M)
Ontario (F)
Quebec (F)
Quebec (M)
Results in Mathematics by Gender and Language at PCAP 2010)
126
453
468
468
470
470
471
473
473
475
475
476
400 425 450 475 500 525 550
Prince Edward Island (F)
Prince Edward Island (M)
Manitoba (F)
Yukon (F)
Manitoba (M)
Newfoundland and Labrador (M)
Nova Scotia (M)
New Brunswick (M)
Saskatchewan (F)
British Columbia (F)
Newfoundland and Labrador (F)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Chart 135
PCAP (2010) Reading
482
486
486
489
490
492
492
499
500
506
507
517
Prince Edward Island (E)
New Brunswick (E)
Newfoundland and Labrador (E)
Nove Scotia (E)
Alberta (F)
Quebec (E)
Saskatchewan (E)
British Columbia (E)
Canada
Alberta (E)
Canada (E)
Ontario (E)
Results in Reading on PCAP (2010) by Jurisdiction andLanguage
127
464
464
468
468
473
475
478
480
480
481
400 425 450 475 500 525 550
New Brunswick (F)
Yukon (E)
Saskatchewan (F)
Manitoba (F)
British Columbia (F)
Nova Scotia (F)
Manitoba (E)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Ontario (F)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PCAP (2010) Sciences
Chart 136
489
490
493
496
497
497
500
501
504
506
510
515
Nove Scotia (E)
Quebec (E)
Prince Edward Island (E)
British Columbia (F)
British Columbia (E)
Ontario (F)
Canada
Nova Scotia (F)
Canada (E)
Alberta (F)
Ontario (E)
Alberta (E)
Results in Sciences on PCAP (2010) by Jurisdiction andLanguage
128
478
482
482
486
486
486
487
487
488
489
400 425 450 475 500 525
Yukon (E)
New Brunswick (F)
Manitoba (F)
Saskatchewan (F)
Manitoba (E)
Quebec (F)
Newfoundland and Labrador (E)
Canada (F)
Saskatchewan (E)
New Brunswick (E)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PISA domain (2000 to 2009)
129
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2000Reading
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
Chart 137 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING
507
516
517
517
521
522
523
525
527
528
529
529
529
533
534
536
538
546
550
AustriaSweden
Newfoundland and Lab.Prince Edward Island
Nova ScotiaJapan
United KingdomKorea
IrelandAustralia
New ZealandSaskatchewan
ManitobaOntario
CANADAQuebec
British ColumbiaFinlandAlberta
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 reading assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
130
396
422
441
458
462
470
474
479
480
483
484
487
492
493
494
497
500
501
504
505
505
507
507
507
375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilMexico
LuxembourgLatvia
Russian FederationPortugalGreecePoland
HungaryLichtenstein
GemanyItaly
Czech RepublicSpain
SwitzerlandDenmark
OECD AverageNew BrunswickUnited States
FranceNorwayIceland
BelgiumAustria
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2000Mathematics
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS
Chart 138
514
514
515
517
520
524
525
529
529
533
533
533
534
536
537
547
547
550
557
IcelandDenmark
AustriaFrance
BelgiumOntario
SaskatchewanUnited Kingdom
SwitzerlandCANADAManitobaAustralia
British ColumbiaFinland
New ZealandKorea
AlbertaQuebec
Japan
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 mathematics assessment
131
334
387
446
447
454
457
463
470
476
478
488
490
493
498
499
500
503
506
509
510
512
513
514
514
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilMexico
LuxembourgGreece
PortugalItaly
LatviaPolandSpain
Russian FederationHungary
GermanyUnited States
Czech RepublicNorway
OECD AverageIreland
New BrunswickNewfoundland and Lab.
SwedenPrince Edward Island
Nova ScotiaLichtenstein
Iceland
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : SCIENCE
Chart 139
PISA 2000Science
511
512
513
516
516
519
522
522
527
528
528
529
532
533
538
541
546
550
552
Czech RepublicSwedenIreland
Nova ScotiaNewfoundland and Lab.
AustriaSaskatchewan
OntarioManitobaAustralia
New ZealandCANADA
United KingdomBritish Columbia
FinlandQuebecAlbertaJapanKorea
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 science assessment
132
375
422
443
459
460
460
461
476
478
481
483
487
491
496
496
496
496
497
499
500
500
500
508
511
350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilMexico
LuxembourgPortugal
LatviaRussian Federation
GreeceLichtenstein
ItalyDenmark
PolandGermany
SpainSwitzerland
BelgiumIceland
HungaryNew Brunswick
United StatesOECD Average
NorwayFrance
Prince Edward IslandCzech Republic
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING
PISA 2003Reading
Chart 140
499500500503507510512513513514515520521522525525525528530534535543543
SwitzerlandOECD Average
NorwayNew Brunswick
BelgiumHong Kong-China
SaskatchewanNetherlandsNova Scotia
SwedenIreland
ManitobaNewfoundland and Lab.
New ZealandLichtenstein
AustraliaQuebec
CANADAOntario
KoreaBritish Columbia
AlbertaFinland
N.B. Differences in scores ares statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2003 reading assessment
133
375
382400403
412420
434441442
469472476478479481482489491491491492492495495496497498498499
350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
TunisiaIndonesia
MexicoBrazil
Serbia and MontenegroThailandUruguay
TurkeyRussian Federation
SlovakiaGreece
ItalyPortugal
LuxembourgSpain
HungaryCzech Republic
LatviaAustria
GermanyIceland
DenmarkPrince Edward Island
United StatesFrancePoland
Macao-ChinaJapan
Switzerland
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS
PISA 2003Mathematics
Chart 141
515515516516517523524527527528529530532534536537538538542544549550
IcelandNova Scotia
Czech RepublicSaskatchewan
Newfoundland and Lab.New Zealand
AustraliaSwitzerland
Macao-ChinaManitobaBelgiumOntario
CANADAJapan
LichtensteinQuebec
NetherlandsBritish Columbia
KoreaFinlandAlberta
Hong Kong-China
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2003 mathematics assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
134
356
359360
385417422423
437445
466466468
483483485490490493495498500500503503506509511512514
325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilTunisia
IndonesiaMexico
ThailandUruguay
TurkeySerbia and Montenegro
GreeceItaly
PortugalRussian Federation
United StatesLatviaSpain
HungaryPoland
LuxembourgNorway
SlovakiaOECD Average
Prince Edward IslandIreland
GermanyAustria
SwedenFrance
New BrunswickDenmark
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2003Sciences
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE
Chart 142
505506506509511512513514515519520521523524525525525527
538539539
548548
Nova ScotiaSaskatchewan
SwedenBelgiumFrance
ManitobaSwitzerland
Newfoundland and Lab.Ontario
CANADAQuebec
New ZealandCzech Republic
NetherlandsMacao-China
AustraliaLichtenstein
British ColumbiaCorée
AlbertaHong Kong-China
JapanFinland
Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet sciences à l'épreuve duAverage scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2003 science assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
135
385
390395
405429434436438
468475481483484486487489489489491491494495495498498502503505505
350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
TunisiaBrazil
IndonesiaMexico
ThailandTurkey
Serbia and MontenegroUruguayPortugal
DenmarkGreece
LuxembourgNorway
ItalySpain
Prince Edward IslandLatvia
Russian FederationAustria
United StatesOECD Average
IcelandSlovakia
New BrunswickPoland
GermanyHungary
IrelandNova Scotia
Scores
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2006Reading
Chart 143 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING
508
510
513
514
516
517
521
522
527
528
534
535
536
547
556
Poland
Lichtenstein
Australia
Newfoundland and …
Manitoba
Ireland
New Zealand
Quebec
Canada
British Columbia
Ontario
Alberta
China-Hong Kong
Finland
Korea
Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet lecture à l'épreuve du PISA2006
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 reading assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
136
488
490
491
492
494
494
495
495
496
497
497
498
499
501
501
505
507
507
507
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
France
Austria
OECD Average
China-Macao
Slovenia
Denmark
United Kingdom
Germany
Chinese Taipei
Prince Edward Island
New Brunswick
Japan
Switzerland
Estonia
Belgium
Nova Scotia
Sweden
Saskatchewan
Netherlands
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2006Reading
Continued from Chart 144
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING (continued)
447
460
461
466
469
470
472
477
479
479
482
483
484
484
Turkey
Greece
Spain
Slovakia
Italy
Lithuania
Portugal
Croatia
Luxemburg
Latvia
Hungary
Czech Republic
Norway
Iceland
Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet lecture à l'épreuve du PISA2006
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 reading assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
137
285
312
353
374
380
385
392
393
393
396
401
401
402
410
413
417
439
440
442
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzstan
Qatar
Azerbaijan
Argentina
Tunisia
Colombia
Montenegro
Indonesia
Brazil
Romania
Serbia
Jordan
Bulgaria
Mexico
Uruguay
Thailand
Israel
Russian Federation
Chile
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2006Mathematics
Chart 145 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS
522
523
523
525
525
526
527
530
530
531
540
547
547
548
549
New Zealand
Japan
British Columbia
Lichtenstein
China-Macao
Ontario
Canada
Switzerland
Alberta
Netherlands
Quebec
Korea
China-Hong Kong
Finland
Chinese Taipei
Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet mathématiques à l'épreuvedu PISA 2006
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 mathematics assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
138
496
498
501
501
502
504
504
505
506
506
506
507
507
510
513
515
520
520
521
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
France
OECD Average
Prince Edward Island
Ireland
Sweden
Slovenia
Germany
Austria
Nova Scotia
New Brunswick
Iceland
Saskatchewan
Newfoundland and …
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Australia
Belgium
Manitoba
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2006Mathematics
Continued from Chart 145
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: MATHEMATICS (continued)
462
466
467
474
476
476
480
486
486
490
490
491
492
495
495
Italy
Portugal
Croatia
United States
Russian Federation
Azerbaijan
Spain
Lithuania
Latvia
Norway
Luxemburg
Hongrie
Slovakia
United Kingdom
Poland
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 mathematics assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
139
311
318
365
370
370
381
384
391
399
406
411
413
415
417
424
427
435
442
459
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzistan
Qatar
Tunisia
Colombia
Brazil
Argentina
Jordan
Indonesia
Montenegro
Mexico
Chile
Bulgaria
Romania
Thailand
Turkey
Uruguay
Serbia
Israel
Greece
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2006Science
Chart 146
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE
522
523
525
526
527
530
531
531
531
532
534
537
539
542
550
563
Korea
Manitoba
Netherlands
Newfoundland and …
Australia
New Zealand
Quebec
Japan
Estonia
Chinese Taipei
Canada
Ontario
British Columbia
China-Hong Kong
Alberta
Finland
Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet science à l'épreuve du PISA2006
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 science assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
140
495
496
498
500
503
504
506
508
509
510
511
511
512
513
515
516
517
519
520
522
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
France
Denmark
Poland
OECD Average
Sweden
Hongrie
New Brunswick
Ireland
Prince Edward Island
Belgium
China-Macao
Austria
Switzerland
Czech Republic
United Kingdom
Germany
Saskatchewan
Slovenia
Nova Scotia
Lichtenstein
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2006Science
Continued from Chart 146
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE (continued)
454
473
474
475
479
486
487
488
488
488
489
490
491
493
Israel
Greece
Portugal
Italy
Russian Federation
Luxemburg
Norway
Spain
Slovakia
Lithuania
United States
Latvia
Iceland
Croatia
Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet sciences à l'épreuve duPISA 2006
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 science assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.
141
322
349
382
386
388
390
391
393
410
412
418
421
422
424
428
434
436
438
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzistan
Qatar
Azerbaijan
Tunisia
Colombia
Brazil
Argentina
Indonesia
Mexico
Montenegro
Romania
Thailand
Jordan
Turkey
Uruguay
Bulgaria
Serbia
Chile
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2009Reading
Chart 147 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
506
506
508
515
516
520
521
522
524
525
526
531
533
533
536
539
556
Newfoundland and Labrador
Belgium
Netherlands
Australia
Nova Scotia
Japan
New Zealand
Quebec
Canada
British Columbia
Singapore
Ontario
Alberta
China-Hong Kong
Finland
Korea
Shanghai (China)
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2009 reading assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.
142
487
489
494
494
495
495
495
496
496
497
497
499
499
500
500
500
501
501
503
504
506
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
China-Macao
Portugal
Hongrie
United Kingdom
Manitoba
Chinese Taipei
Denmark
France
Ireland
Sweden
Germany
Lichtenstein
New Brunswick
United States
Poland
Iceland
Estonia
Switzerland
Norway
Saskatchewan
Newfoundland and Labrador
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
PISA 2009Reading
Continued from Chart Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and
Country: READING (continued)
459
459
464
468
470
472
474
476
477
478
481
483
483
484
486
486
Russian Federation
Dubai
Turkey
Lithuania
Austria
Luxemburg
Israel
Croatia
Slovakia
Czech Republic
Spain
Greece
Slovenia
Latvia
Prince Edward Island
Italy
Scores moyens et intervalles de confiance par provincecanadienne et par pays au volet lecture à l'épreuve du PISA2009
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2009 reading assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.
143
314
362
370
371
372
385
390
398
402
404
405
408
412
413
416
421
424
425
426
429
442
449
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzstan
Azerbaijan
Peru
Panama
Qatar
Albania
Kazakhstan
Argentina
Indonesia
Tunisia
Jordan
Montenegro
Brazil
Colombia
Trinidad and Tobago
Thailand
Romania
Mexico
Uruguay
Bulgaria
Serbia
Chile
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2009 Mathematics
Chart 148 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: MATHEMATICS
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
519
523
525
526
526
527
529
529
534
536
541
543
543
546
555
562
600
Ne Zealand
British Columbia
China-Macao
Netherlands
Ontario
Canada
Alberta
Japan
Switzerland
Lichtenstein
Finland
Quebec
Chinese Taipei
Korea
China-Hong Kong
Singapore
Shanghai (China)
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2009 mathematics assessment
144
492
493
494
495
496
497
497
498
501
501
503
503
504
506
507
512
512
513
514
515
519
275 350 425 500 575
United Kingdom
Czech Republic
Sweden
Poland
Austria
France
Slovakia
Norway
Manitoba
Slovenia
Newfoundland and Labrador
Denmark
New Brunswick
Saskatchewan
Iceland
Estonia
Nova Scotia
Germany
Australia
Belgium
New Zealand
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2009 Mathematics
Continued from Chart Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and
Country: MATHEMATICS (continued)
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
442
445
447
453
460
466
468
477
482
483
483
487
487
487
487
489
490
Serbia
Turkey
Israel
Dubai
Croatia
Greece
Russian Federation
Lithuania
Latvia
Spain
Italy
United States
Portugal
Ireland
Prince Edward Island
Luxemburg
Hongrie
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2009 mathematics assessment
145
331
360
365
368
371
371
377
381
386
387
388
403
405
414
419
419
421
427
427
428
431
275 350 425 500 575
Kyrgyzstan
Panama
Peru
Qatar
Indonesia
Tunisia
Albania
Colombia
Brazil
Jordan
Argentina
Montenegro
Kazakhstan
Trinidad and Tobago
Thailand
Mexico
Chile
Romania
Uruguay
Bulgaria
Azerbaijan
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
PISA 2009Sciences
Chart 149 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCES
520
522
523
524
527
528
529
531
532
535
538
539
542
545
549
554
575
Chinese Taipei
Netherlands
Nova Scotia
Quebec
Australia
Estonia
Canada
Ontario
New Zealand
British Columbia
Korea
Japan
Singapore
Alberta
China-Hong Kong
Finland
Shanghai (China)
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2009 sciences assessment
146
496
498
499
500
500
501
502
503
506
507
508
508
511
512
513
514
517
518
520
520
520
300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Iceland
France
Denmark
Czech Republic
Norway
New Brunswick
United States
Hongrie
Manitoba
Belgium
Ireland
Poland
China-Macao
Slovenia
Saskatchewan
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Newfoundland and Labrador
Lichtenstein
Germany
Chinese Taipei
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2009Sciences
Continued from Chart Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and
Country: SCIENCES (continued)
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
447
454
455
466
470
478
484
486
488
489
490
491
493
494
494
495
495
Chile
Turkey
Israel
Dubai
Greece
Russian Federation
Luxemburg
Croatia
Spain
Italy
Slovakia
Lithuania
Portugal
Austria
Latvia
Sweden
Prince Edward Island
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2009 sciences assessment
147
330
369
373
376
379
383
391
400
401
401
401
402
405
410
415
416
425
427
428
439
443
300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Kyrgyzstan
Peru
Azerbaijan
Panama
Qatar
Indonesia
Albania
Kazakhstan
Argentina
Tunisia
Montenegro
Colombia
Brazil
Trinidad and Tobago
Jordan
Mexico
Thailand
Uruguay
Romania
Bulgaria
Serbia
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
148
Conclusion
Conclusion
This marks the seventeenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.
The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2010-2011 school year. This year, an effort was made to reduce the size of the report while maintaining the level of information presented. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.
These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .
149
Conclusion
This marks the seventeenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.
The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2010-2011 school year. This year, an effort was made to reduce the size of the report while maintaining the level of information presented. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.
These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .
We would appreciate receiving your comments by mail or e-mail once you have read this report. Please send them to the addresses indicated at the beginning. The Department will examine your questionnaire responses and comments with great care.
Note, too, that school principals and district superintendents, as well as appropriate departmental staff, are available to answer any further questions you may have.
150
Top Related