8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 1/25
SPE 151819
Water Conservation: Reducing Freshwater Consumption by UsingProduced Water for Base Fluid in Hydraulic Fracturing –Case Histories inArgentina
Juan Bonapace and Mariano Giglio, SPE, Halliburton; Juan Moggia and Angeles Krenz, Pan American Energy
Copyright 2012, Society of Petroleum Engineers
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference held in Mexico City, Mexico, 16 –18 April 2012.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not beenreviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, itsofficers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission toreproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.
AbstractIn the Golfo San Jorge basin (GSJB), in the area of Cerro Dragón, a sustained increase of activity has developed over the past
ten years. Further development of the field has been achieved with well stimulations (hydraulic-fracturing treatments),
increasing production rates.
This has resulted in increased water consumption for these operations. In an effort to ration water sources, well owners
must find alternatives to reduce the volume of fresh water consumed.
Throughout the past five years, one operator has worked to use produced water, or low-quality injection water, as a source
of water for stimulation applications. The methodology applied consisted of
Identifying different types of water produced in the field
Performing tests on the waters (physical-chemical and bacteriological)
Performing tests with commonly used fracturing fluids to identify good performance
Conducting tests during field operationsEstablishing procedures for water injection from the results obtained
Continuous monitoring, as well as the introduction of new techniques and improvements
The results that were obtained demonstrate how the operations performed have gradually increased by using this
methodology (412 of 760 fracturing treatments during 2010). In addition, the reduction in freshwater use was 54.8% of the
total amount in 2010 (5.7 of 10.5 million gal).
This work has helped identify sources of produced water in the field that are acceptable for use in fracturing stimulation
operations. A procedure has been established to help ensure a reliable fracturing fluid with good performance is always used
in these operations. Additionally, new techniques and equipment have been incorporated that contribute to continuous
improvements to the process.
IntroductionA large area called Patagonia exists in the southern part of Argentina, within which are three productive hydrocarbon basins
(Neuquina, Golfo San Jorge, and Austral). The water sources for human use and consumption in Patagonia are rivers and
lakes, which are fed by waters traveling from the mountain-chain melting sector; in the same way, this water supply is
obtained from phreatic levels. The first hydrocarbon finding in Argentina was that of the GSJB, discovered during the search
for water for human consumption.
The city of Comodoro Rivadavia was officially founded in 1901; this settlement was located 160 km from the nearest
lake, Lake Muster. The water supply for the early population was derived from natural water springs, and the search for water
(phreatic levels) started in 1903. Oil was found by chance at a depth of 540 m in December of 1907.
Currently, freshwater supply for the city is obtained from Lake Muster; this water is transferred through an aqueduct
using three pumping platforms (Cerro Negro, Valle Hermoso, and Cerro Dragón). This system supplies water to the cities of
Comodoro Rivadavia and Rada Tilly in the province of Chubut, 170 km away, and Caleta Olivia in the province of Santa
Cruz, about 220 km away.
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 2/25
2 SPE 151819
According to the last national census conducted in 2010, Comodoro Rivadavia and Rada Tilly have a population of
176,000 inhabitants in the province of Chubut; Caleta Olivia is inhabited by 104,000 people in the province of Santa Cruz.
Considering that 0.28 m3 is the average daily water consumption per person, the following consumption averages have been
obtained: 78,512 m3 per day or 235,536 m3 per month.
In the last few years, the well operator has increased its oil production from 7,909 m 3 per day (January 2000) to 15,565 m3
per day (January 2010), attributed to strong activity in the Cerro Dragón area (Fig. 1). This led to increased rigs, well
completions, and well workover operations. There was a sustained increase in fracturing activity associated with these
completions and interventions. Two fracturing campaigns were performed in 2000 and six in 2010 (Figs. 2 and 3).The freshwater supply for operations in the Cerro Dragón area comes from the aqueduct that provides water for the city of
Comodoro Rivadavia. Because of this, fresh water used in fracturing represents greater than 90% of the total amount of fresh
water used in completion and workover operations. Approximately 20% of the total amount of fresh water from the aqueduct
is consumed.
Because the chemicals used in fracturing operations are sensitive to certain components present in water used for
fracturing-fluid preparation, and the need for a certain degree of fracturing-gel stability, historically speaking, fresh water has
been used to help ensure the success of the operation. However, careful tests were performed in the laboratory to adjust
fracturing-fluid formulations. In an effort to help preserve natural freshwater resources, the operator decided to replace fresh
water with field-water sources from its water-flooding system.
Fig. 1—Increased oil production.
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 3/25
SPE 151819 3
Fig. 2—Increased rigs.
Fig. 3—Increased fracturing sets.
Reservoir GeologyThe GSJB is located in the provinces of Chubut and Santa Cruz in southern Argentina. It is irregular in shape and has a
longer east-west-oriented elongation, with its continental surface covering 65% and the remaining 35% settling down on the
continental platform. The basin genesis is of the extensional type and of the Mesozoic era. Its main filling occurred during the
rifting stages of the late Jurassic period, early Cretaceous, and is mainly of lacustrian and fluvial origin.
Source rocks were from the D-129 formation and Matasiete, with a large variety of light and heavy oils (15 to 35 API),
middle and heavy oils being the most common. The accumulated oils in the Mina el Carmen formation are lighter than thoseof the Comodoro Rivadavia formation. The traps are mostly of a combined nature (sedimentary and structural), and the
structural style is mainly found in the east area of the extensional type and in the west area of the compressional type (San
Bernardo fault through belt).
The main productive levels are the Mina el Carmen (continental, lacustrian, and fluvial environments), Comodoro
Rivadavia, and El Trébol (continental environment of the fluvial and deltaic kind) formations. Sand bodies show a 2- to 10-m
thickness, with variable porosity from 17 to 27%, diminishing in depth and with fluctuating permeability values, maintaining
50 md as an average value.
Geographical DescriptionThe Cerro Dragón field is located 85 km from the city of Comodoro Rivadavia (Fig. 4) on the west side of the GSJB in the
province of Chubut, the Argentine Republic. The area of operation consists of approximately 50 different fields, covering an
operative area close to 3,500 km2, which contains 3,800 active wells with an average depth of 2,200 m. About 50% of the
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 4/25
4 SPE 151819
oilfield production derives from 60 secondary recovery projects, with a total number of 650 injector wells. The Cerro Dragón
field has been under development and exploitation since 1959.
Fig. 4—Area of operation.
Fracturing FluidFracturing fluid must have the following characteristics: security, easy preparation, low fluid loss, high proppant transport
capacity (viscosity), low pipe friction, and easy removal from the reservoir. In general, water-based fluids, hydrocarbons, or
foams (nitrogen or carbon dioxide) can be used. Within these parameters, these fluids can generally achieve very good
viscosity, generally achieved by means of a gelling agent. . For water based fluids, guar-gum derivatives, such as
hydroxipropil guar (HPG) and carboximetil-hydroxipropil guar (CMHPG), are generally used. These tend to produce less
residue and have faster hydration; but, they are more sensitive to salt content and solids in the source water. Crosslinkers
generate a significant viscosity increase in the guar-polymer gels, using borate (B), as well as zirconium (Zr), titanium (Ti),
and, in smaller quantities, antimony (Sb) and aluminium (Al) as the crosslinkers.
Crosslinked fluids have a greater capacity to transport fracturing proppants than uncrosslinked fluids. This transporting
capacity is measured using a rheometer in which fluid is tested at specific temperature conditions and shear rates. In these
tests, it is possible to observe the transporting elastic regime zone and proppant settling; a minimum transport-capacity value
of 400 cp at 40 1/sec can be determined (Harris et al. 2005). This value was taken as a reference for fracturing-fluid tests
developed using the rheometer.
During the last decade, studies have concentrated on fluid-system development of gel polymers, and friction reducers that
can be used for fracturing treatments using produced water. Some of these cases have been documented by the following
authors:
Parket et al. (2003a, 2003b) and Hanes et al. (2003) present a fracturing fluid (high-performance fluid) that can be
reused after being recovered during the flowback stage.
Huang et al. (2005) documents the analysis performed with fluid (CMHPG) using produced water.
Walters et al. (2009) presents a new fracturing fluid (new biopolymer fracturing fluid) that can be used with
produced water.
Applications
Applications and Experience: 2005. Because of increased and sustained activity during the years 2000 to 2005, a need
developed for alternative sources to fresh water in the Cerro Dragón area. The first step consisted of identifying different
sources (water), water-loading platforms, fracturing-fluid analyses, and evaluations using these water sources. The tests
performed on water as well as on fracturing fluids are presented in Tables 1 and 2. It is important to point out that, during the
first stage, tests on bacteria in water were not performed because of the time required to develop these particular tests.
Initially, two temperatures of 190 and 160°F (65% of the total number of operations) were selected. This was simplified
by working with one fracturing fluid — low-guar borate medium temperature (LGB-MT) at two formulations: 30-ppt guar at
190°F and 27-ppt guar at 160°F.
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 5/25
SPE 151819 5
TABLE 1—WATER, PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL TESTS
Produced-Water Tests
pH Determination
Temperature determination
Calcium
Sulphites
Phosphates
Alkanity
Magnesium
Iron
Sulphates
Chlorides
Hardness
Test 1. In May 2005, two geographical areas were evaluated with water sources in Valle Hermoso and Cerro Dragón.
Valle Hermoso — Four sampling sources were identified in this area:
Source A — Water-producer well (Sample 1).
Source B — Valle Hermoso plant, without treatment (Sample 2).
Source C — Valle Hermoso plant, treated (Sample 3).
Source D — Valle Hermoso loading platform (Sample 4).
Cerro Dragón — Four sampling sources were identified in this area:
Source E — Water-producer well (Sample 5).
Source F — Cerro Dragón plant, treated (Sample 6).
Source G — ICD-13 loading platform (Sample 7).
Source H — Cañadón Grande loading platform (Sample 8).
Source A — The sample was taken from the producer well; it showed organic-material remains (moss), fetid smell, and
high temperatures. Routine tests were conducted on water with normal values for that kind of water (no bacteria
determination was performed). Fracturing-fluid tests (hydration test) showed base-gel viscosity loss, 7 cp at 511 at 1/sec at
120 minutes, denoting a typical behavior of bactericide presence.
Source B — The sample was taken at the fluid entrance of the treatment plant. This sample resulted in high hydrocarbon
content and was discarded for analysis, as well as for fracturing-fluid application.
Source C —
The sample was taken at the exit of the Valle Hermoso treatment plant. The sample showed crystallineaspects. The routine water-based tests performed remained within normal values (chlorides > 3,000 ppm). Fracturing-fluid
tests showed normal values with respect to viscosity and hydration time. Two fracturing-fluid stability tests were performed
under dynamic conditions in a rheometer (Fig. 5, Test 1 and Fig. 6, Test 6):
190°F at 120 min = viscosity 858 cp at 40 1/sec.
160°F at 120 min = viscosity 806 cp at 40 1/sec.
TABLE 2—FRACTURING FLUID TEST
Hydration gel(viscosity, cp at 511 1/sec)
Vortex time
pH Final
Lip test
Gel stability(static and dynamic,rheometer )
Transportation time capacity(viscosity = 400 cp at 40 1/sec )
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 6/25
6 SPE 151819
Fig. 5—Rheometer measurements using different water sources (2005).
Source D — The sample was taken at the Valle Hermoso loading platform (treated water). The water showed oil traces and
impurity, which were determined to be potentially useable. Fracturing-fluid tests showed normal values with respect to
viscosity and hydration time. A fracturing-fluid stability test was performed under dynamic conditions in a rheometer (Fig. 5,
Test 2):
190°F at 120 min = viscosity 681 cp at 40 1/sec.
Source E — The sample was taken at the producer well. It showed high hydrocarbon content; as a consequence, it was
discarded.
Source F — The sample was taken at the exit of the Cerro Dragón treatment plant. It showed crystalline aspects, and water
tests showed normal values. Fracturing-fluid tests showed normal values for viscosity and hydration time. Two fracturing-
fluid stability tests were conducted under dynamic conditions in a rheometer (Fig. 5, Test 3 and Fig. 6, Test 7):
190°F at 120 min = viscosity 923 cp at 40 1/sec.
160°F at 120 min = viscosity 590 cp at 40 1/sec.
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 7/25
SPE 151819 7
Fig. 6— Rheometer measurements using different water sources (2005).
Source G — The sample was taken at the ICD-13 loading platform. It showed crystalline aspects; water tests showed
normal values. Fracturing-fluid tests were normal with respect to viscosity and hydration time. Two stability tests were
conducted in the rheometer (Fig. 5, Test 4 and Fig. 6, Test 8).
190°F at 120 min = viscosity 662 cp at 40 1/sec.
160°F at 120 min = viscosity 437 cp at 40 1/sec.
Source H — The sample was taken at the Cañadón Grande loading platform. Its aspect was determined to be dirtier, with
strong fetid odor and hydrocarbon traces. Routine water-based tests performed remained within normal values (chlorides >
3,000 ppm) with respect to viscosity and hydration time. A fracturing-fluid stability test was conducted under dynamic
conditions in a rheometer (Fig. 5, Test 5):
190°F at 120 min = viscosity 690 cp at 40 1/sec.
Table 3 presents results obtained from fracturing-fluid tests on hydration, base-gel viscosity, and vortex time.
TABLE 3—FRACTURING-FLUID TESTS
DataTest 130 ppt
Test 230 ppt
Test 330 ppt
Test 430 ppt
Test 530 ppt
Test 627 ppt
Test 727 ppt
Test 827 ppt
Water pH 7.48 7.77 7.35 7.88 7.98 7.48 7.48 7.94
Water temperature, °F 66.7 63.1 65.8 68.4 80.4 69.1 66.6 67.6Gel viscosity, cp at 511 at 1/sec 25 24.5 24 24 23.5 22 20 21
Gel pH 7.22 7.46 7.22 7.91 7.65 7.58 7.12 7.65
Vortex time, sec 9 20 9 12 11 22 18 17
XI gel pH 9.27 9.26 9.28 9.18 9.21 9.08 9.15 9.25
The total testing series concluded that the samples from Sources F, G, C, and H showed the best results for both
temperatures (190 and 160°F).
I niti al Test 1. In June 2005, there was an opportunity to perform well stimulations on Well PCG-870 using produced
water. Based on the recommendations obtained from tests, it was decided that water from Source G should be used. When an
attempt was made to obtain a sample, the charge pump was not on; therefore, the sample could not be taken . It was
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 8/25
8 SPE 151819
determined that there was a stoppage at the plant, which impacted the pumping stations. A sample from Source H was then
suggested, but the same problem occurred. Later, a sample from Source H was obtained.
Routine tests were conducted and revealed a dirty aspect with dark color, particles in suspension, and high values of
chlorides, as in previous samples. Normal hydration values were obtained with respect to gel tests; the results in the
rheometer showed a fast viscosity decrease, demonstrating that the water from Source H was not acceptable for the treatment
to be performed.
The possible causes of Source H water not being acceptable for use with a fracturing fluid are that the water remained
stagnant in the pump system for several days, or the stoppage of the plant could have influenced normal treatments performedon the water.
I niti al Test 2. In July 2005, there was anotheropportunity to perform a test on Well PCG-947. Source H was chosen for
this treatment and water and fracturing-fluid tests were conducted, obtaining normal values in the rheometer (Fig. 7, Test 10).
Finally, breaker tests were developed, evidencing the need to reformulate the breaker concentrations to achieve a viscosity
profile acceptable for the operation (Fig. 7, Test 11).
In addition, a sample of Source G was taken as an alternative. It was tested and showed normal parameters with respect to
water and gel during rheometer tests (Fig. 7, Test 12).
Fig. 7—Initial Test 2, Source H sample in 2005.
Table 4 presents results obtained from fracturing-fluid tests on hydration, pH, viscosity, and vortex-time tests.
TABLE 4—FRACTURING-FLUID TESTS
DataTest 9 Tap Water
30 pptTest 1030 ppt
Test 1130 ppt + Breaker
Test 1230 ppt
Water pH 7.78 7.87 8.08 7.96
Water temperature, °F 62.4 61.5 62.2 63.5
Gel viscosity, cp at 511 1/sec 26 26.5 26 25.5
Gel pH 6.95 7.04 7.15 7.06
Vortex time, sec 17 17 16 18
crosslinked gel pH 9.52 9.51 9.5 9.43
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 9/25
SPE 151819 9
Because of a redesign of the well intervention plan (delayed), the treatment has not yet been performed; however, initial
tests were still performed for use on a future well.
I niti al Test 3. In early August 2005, an opportunity arose to use produced water on Well PVH-923. Considering the
geographical location of the well, Sources D and H were selected as possible water sources to be tested. Prejob tests were
performed with the two samples; water parameters and gel-hydration parameters tested normal. A better water quality was
suspected for Source H. As a result, the Source H fluid sample was tested in the rheometer (Fig. 8, Test 13) and Sample D
was discarded.At the time of collecting the Source H water supply, a problem in the supply system was detected, making it impossible to
load and transport water from Source H to the well. Given the time proximity to perform the treatment, it was decided to
replace the water with Source G, which had been tested as an alternative sample in the previous well (PCG-947). The water
was loaded into the fracturing fluid tank while routine tests were simultaneously conducted. Once good fluid-stability results
were obtained, the break was reformulated and tested (Fig. 8, Tests 14 and 15).
Fig. 8—Initial Test 3, Source G sample in 2005.
Table 5 presents results obtained from fracturing-fluid tests on hydration, pH, viscosity, and vortex time.
TABLE 5—FRACTURING-FLUID TESTS
DataTest 1330 ppt
Test 1430 ppt
Test 1530 ppt + Breaker
Water pH 7.93 8.32 8.03
Water temperature, °F 60.8 84.9 71.6
Gel viscosity, cp at 511 1/sec 28 24 26
Gel pH 6.9 7.03 7.18
Vortex time, sec 12 12 11
Crosslinked gel pH 9.3 9.33 9.36
Finally, the treatment was performed within normal parameters with no evidence seen of abnormal values that could
impact fluid performance; there were only pressure variations caused by a cavitation problem in one of the pumps (Fig. 9).
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 10/25
10 SPE 151819
Fig. 9—Fracturing treatment chart.
Soon after, the cleaning and reloading of fracturing fluid tanks using water from sample Source G was performed. A
sample was taken to the laboratory and tested at a lower temperature (165°F). The results of the water and gel-hydration tests
were normal (Table 6). The next step was stability tests performed in the rheometer.
TABLE 6—FRACTURING-FLUID TESTS
DataTest 1627 ppt
Test 1730 ppt + Stabilizer
Test 1830 ppt New Guar
Water pH 8.01 7.89 7.93
Water temperature, °F 62.4 63.1 62.2
Gel viscosity, cp at 511 1/sec 20 24 25
Gel pH 7.14 7.19 7.26
Vortex time, sec 13 14 13
Crosslinked gel pH 9.35 9.37 9.41
Good results were not obtained (Fig. 10, Test 16); therefore, some modifications were implemented in the fluid to reach
the viscosity profile expected. Gel loading was increased, a temperature stabilizer was added (Fig. 10, Test 17), and another
type of gelling agent (guar gum of higher performance) was used (Fig. 10, Test 18), but the minimum acceptable values to
perform the treatment were not reached.
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 11/25
SPE 151819 11
Fig. 10—Additional stability tests in 2005.
Applications and Experience — 2006. In 2006, there were no tests on fracturing fluid, nor were initial field tests conducted.
However, all the information previously obtained was evaluated and a job methodology to use produced water in fracturing
fluids was developed. These items were considered:
A better water-quality source from the Cerro Dragón plant, from Sources F and G, was identified.
Other source samples showed great variability as well.
Freight and transportation systems must be clean (trucks).The main problems detected were related to bacteria generation, favorable temperature conditions, pH, and impurity
in water.
Methodology developed for produced water use with fracturing fluids:
Empty fracturing tank; do not leave gel remains.
Fill up the tank with 3,000 gal of water. Raise the pH with a sodium-hydroxide solution until a pH value equaling 10
or 11 is obtained.
Retrieve water from a clean fracturing fluid tank.
Empty the tank and clean it with water. Start collecting water and add bactericide.
Perform a prejob test.
Do not gel fracturing fluid until a plug positive result is obtained (well operational issue); minimize time with
prepared gelled fluid.
Perform prejob with gelled fluid in fracturing fluid tank.Start the operation.
Once the operation is finished, repeat.
Applications and Experience — 2007. In 2007, the goal was to perform 20 fracturing stages using this methodology. In
March, there was an unusual situation in the field regarding a freshwater supply stoppage. This meant implementing the
methodology previously stated; a total of 17 operations were then successfully conducted using this methodology.
Notwithstanding this, for intervening Well PZ-1047, the first two fracturing treatments were conducted at a higher
temperature (230°F) in which a type of fluid CMHPG-zirconate is normally used ( Fig. 11, Test 19). Because of this, the fluid
was tested with produced water from sample Source G; however, poor results were obtained (Fig. 11, Test 20). Guar-borate
for high temperatures was suggested, which is not as sensitive to high-chloride contents. A sample of water from Source C
was used for this test. Even though the fluid was formulated with a larger polymeric load and temperature stabilizer, the
result was negative (Fig. 11, Test 21).
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 12/25
12 SPE 151819
Fig. 11—Test for Well PZ-1047.
Because of this, it was decided to perform fracturing treatment operations at a lesser depth (lesser temperature), perform
fracturing- fluid tests to obtain good results, and wait to obtain a freshwater supply to be able to use high-temperature fluid
(CMHPG-Zr) in the deeper two operations.
In May and July of 2007, more operations were completed using produced water, with which a total number of 27
treatments were completed. This surpassed the goal proposed, amounting to 3% of the activity for the year. This amount
represents a consumption of 1,730 m
3
(457,000 gal) of produced water, achieving a reduction of 5% of the total amount offresh water used to perform 907 fracturing treatments (Fig. 12).
In August, a physical-chemical and bacteriological analysis of the water from Sample G was performed. The results are
presented in Tables 7 and 8.
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 13/25
SPE 151819 13
Fig. 12—Fracturing treatment stages performed from 1999 through 2010.
TABLE 7—WATER-PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Physical-Chemical Analysis Sample, mg/L
pH 7.25
Carbonates 0
Bicarbonate 3.8
Chlorides 91
Sulphates 0.79
Calcium 4
Magnesium 1.97
Iron 0
Sodium 130.6
Potassium 0
TABLE 8—WATER-BACTERIOLOGIST ANALYSIS
Bacteriological Analysis Sample, ppm
R2A (aerobia oligotrophics) 2.90E+04
TSBC (aerobia Heterotrophics) 1.29E+05
BSR 1.00E+03
TG (bacteria anaerobics) 1.00E+01
The chemical composition of the Source G sample was similar to many others from the GSJB. This composition presents
a high content of sodium chloride with a normal pH level and the bacterial amount not being large. From the bacteriological
analysis, it can be determined that the sample showed bacteria, but in a smaller proportion than what was expected to
generate gel instability. The gels prepared with this water sample did not show meaningful modifications out of the four
bacterial groups analyzed that could develop from this kind of water.
Applications and Experience — 2008. The expectation for 2008 was to conduct 50 frac stages using this methodology.
During that year, it was decided to continue using water from Source G.
The activity that developed (Table 9) that year consisted of 72treatments, surpassing the goal proposed and reaching 8%
of the entire activity developed. Because of the geographical location of the source, the activity was concentrated in nearby
fields because of supply concerns.
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 14/25
14 SPE 151819
TABLE 9—2008 ACTIVITY
Fields Cañadón Grande Cerro Dragón La Madreselva Oriental Valle Hermoso Zorro
Wells 15 7 2 1 2 1
Frac stages 36 22 6 1 6 1
Avg depth, m 2090 1750 2230 1560 1540 2480
Avg temp, °F 187 163 195 231 156 208
Frac fluid LGB-MT LGB-MT LGB-MT LGB-MT LGB-MT & LT LGB-MT
Fluid volume, m3 2581 1588 347 99 298 51
The most activity during 2008 was developed in Cañadón Grande and Cerro Dragón, where 81% of the operations were
conducted with 84% of the total fluid used (Fig. 13).
Fig. 13—Main activity of Cañadón Grande and Cerro Dragón,
Finally, a reduction of 13% of the fresh water used for the performance of the 891 fracturing treatments was reached that
year. This represents 4,964 m3 of produced water consumption (1.3 millon gal) (Fig. 12).
Applications and Experience —
2009. During the beginning of 2009, the objective was to perform 90 frac stages using thismethodology; at the same time, some improvements were implemented.
Started using a preblender unit in real-time.
Searches were conducted for new water sources and loading platforms.
Preblender Uni t. A preblender unit is designed to supply additives and liquid or powdered gel in quantities accurately
measured in a blender unit. The preblender unit allows the development of up to 100 bbl/min operations (Yeager et al. 1998;
Weinstein et al. 2009).
The preblender unit used for operations has a storage tank with room for 50 liquid gel concentrate (LGC) barrels, plus a
hydration tank for 75 job volume barrels. The LGC is composed of a base fluid (diesel) and a dry power gelling agent so that
the latter can be kept in suspension; LGC contained 4 lbm of a high-viscosity, rapid-yielding, and intermediate-residue guar
gum per gal of concentrate (Fig. 14).
ANTIC LINALFUNES
ANTICLINAL
GRANDE SUR
HUETEL
BAYO
CHULENGO
MESETACATORCE
ESCORIAL
ORIENTALOESTE ORIENTAL
LA MADRESELVASUR
LA MADRESELVAVALLEMARTIN
TRES PICOS
ZORRO
RESERO
CAÑADON
GRANDE
CERRO D RAGON
CERROTORTUGA
CAÑADONPEDRO
ELGATOVALLE HERMOSO
VALLE HERMOSONORTE
LAS FLORES
RIO CHICO
ELTRIANGULO
PADRE CORTIEL CONDOR
PAMPA
PAMPASUR
SAN AGUSTINLA PIEDRA
EL KIKEN
MARIANA
SourceWater
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 15/25
SPE 151819 15
Fig. 14—
Preblender unit at operation.
This unit was limited to minimum fluid and proppant volume operations averaging 55 m3 water produced and 210,000
lbm of proppant. The goals were to evaluate the operation’s performance, as well as reduce operation time, which were
obtained because of the application of the blender methodology for fracturing fluid when using produced water (Fig. 15).
Fig. 15—Typical fracturing treatment chart for small treatment.
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 16/25
16 SPE 151819
This unit removed certain steps in the methodology that would have generated additional time. On average, two operative
hours were saved from each of these treatments.
The methodology for produced water use with the preblender unit was as follows:
Filled up water in fracturing fluid tank and add bactericide.
Performed prejob test with LGC.
Waited for plug positive result (well operational issue).
Performed operation.
Once operation was over, repeat.
This unit implementation was used on 5% of the total number of operations performed using produced water.
New Water Sources. The main objective was to identify other sources as well as evaluate a larger area within the Cerro
Dragón oil field.
For Stage 4, new sources were evaluated as follows:
Source I – Escorial area (Sample 1).
Source J – Oriental area (Sample 2).
Source K – Zorro area (Sample 3).
Source L – Anticlinal Grande area (Sample 4).
Water samples showed a crystalline aspect, in general, without color or a particular odor. Routine tests (physical-
chemical) performed were within normal values for field waters (Table 10), and tests for bacteria determination were notconducted.
TABLE 10—PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL TEST
AnalysisSource IEscorial
Source JOriental
Source KZorro
Source L Anticlinal Grande
pH 6.8 7.4 7.2 7.1
SS in 10 min, mg/L 0 0 0 0
SS in 2 min, mg/L 0 0 0 0
TSS, mg/L 10 0.1 0.1 200
Dry residue 105°C, mg/L 9100 6200 4900 6600
Carbonate, mg/L 1 1 1 1
Bicarbonate, mg/L 80 121 134 201
Chloride, mg/L 8940 5502 4126 5158
Sulfates, mg/L 22 24 25 10
Nitrite, mg/L 80 40 30 60
Nitrate, mg/L 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1
Amony, mg/L 43 9 0.01 5
Calcium, mg/L 1082 601 400 721
Magnesium, mg/L 1 1 1 1
Iron, mg/L 2 1 1 1
Fracturing-fluid tests (hydration, viscosity, vortex time, and pH) showed normal results, without out-of-range values.
Finally, tests were performed in the rheometer to observe the viscosity-profile behavior. The tests were standardized at 180°F
(LGB-MT) for samples of Sources I, J, and K (Fig. 16, Tests 22, 23, and 24); for Sample L, the tests were conducted at
140°F for a LGB-LT fluid (Fig. 16, Test 25).
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 17/25
SPE 151819 17
Fig. 16—Tests performed in 2009 for Samples I through L.
The results showed the sources from the Zorro and Oriental fields were acceptable for use; on the contrary, sources from
the Escorial and Anticlinal Campamento fields were not.
Activity. The activity in 2009 totaled 191 treatments, surpassing the amount proposed. This comprised 24% of the entire
activity for the year. The use of this methodology was implemented on nine fields in the geographical proximity of the water
sources. Initially, the methodology was implemented in nearby fields, such as the Cañadón Grande and Cerro Dragón. Later,its use was extended to La Madreselva, Resero, and Valle Hermoso. Detailed information is presented in Table 11.
TABLE 11—2009 ACTIVITY
FieldsCañadónGrande
CerroDragón Huron
LaMadreselva
LasFlores Resero
RioChico
V.Hermoso Zorro
Wells 14 9 1 8 5 13 6 15 4
Frac stages 24 21 2 22 13 27 20 49 13
Avg depth, m 1998 1750 650 1935 1440 2300 1180 1630 2250
Avg temp, °F 181 167 106 178 150 198 136 160 195
Frac fluid LGB-MT& LT
LGB-MT LGB-MT
LGB-LT LGB-MT <
LGB-MT
LGB-MT& LT
LGB-MT& LT
LGB-MT
Fluid volume,m
3
1576 1441 125 1698 1037 1703 1156 3815 625
The greatest amount of activity was concentrated within these five fields, where 75% of the operations, using 78% of the
total fluid, were carried out (Fig. 17).
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 18/25
18 SPE 151819
Fig. 17—Five fields where operations were performed 2009.
Finally, a reduction of 35% of the total amount of fresh water used was reached for 840 fracturing treatments during this
year. This meant a total consumption of 13,176 m3 (3.5 million gal) of produced water (Fig. 12).
Applications and Experience – 2010. During the beginning of 2010, the objective was to perform 50% of the total number of
treatments using this methodology. The same course of action was desired for 2009:
Increase the use of preblender unit
Continue searching for new water sources and loading platforms.
Preblender Uni t. Because of the good results obtained, this unit continued to be used. Its application was increased and
its use was also adopted for larger-volume fluid and proppant operations (average frac stage, 153 m3 water produced and
120,500 lbm of proppant) (Fig. 18).
ANTICLINALFUNES
ANTICLINALGRANDE SUR
HUETEL
BAYO
CHULENGO
MESETACATORCE
ESCORIAL
ORIENTALOESTE ORIENTAL
LA MADRESELVA
SUR
LA MADRESELVAVALLEMARTIN
TRES PICOS
ZORRO
RESERO
CAÑADON
GRANDE
CERRO DRAGON
CERROTORTUGA
CAÑADONPEDRO
ELGATOVALLE HERMOSO
VALLE HERMOSONORTE
LAS FLORES
RIO CHICO
ELTRIANGULO
PADRE CORTIEL CONDOR
PAMPA
PAMPASUR
SAN AGUSTINLA PIEDRA
EL KIKEN
MARIANA
Source Water
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 19/25
SPE 151819 19
Fig. 18—Fracturing treatment chart when using produced water in 2010.
This unit was used in 31 operations in 2010, which comprised 8% of the entire activity. On the other hand, the total
amount of fluid used in these operations represents 8% of the produced water used in the period analyzed.
New Water Sources. Continuing with this alternative, there was a search for water sources in nearby areas. A search of
the La Madreselva area led to the discovery of four new sources:
Source M – Producer well (Sample 1).
Source N – Transfer manifold (Sample 2).
Source O – Transfer pump (Sample 3).
Source P – CD-LM transfer (Sample 4).
Water samples showed good general results, without color or particular odors; routine tests (physical-chemical)
performed were within the normal values for field waters (Table 12). Bacteria determination tests were not conducted.
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 20/25
20 SPE 151819
TABLE 12—PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL WATER TEST
AnalysisSource M
(S1)Source N
(S2)Source O
(S3)Source P
(S4)
pH 7.8 7.4 7.6 7.4
SS in 10 min, mg/L 0 0 0 0
SS in 2 min, mg/L 0 0.2 0 0
TSS, mg/L 0.1 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Dry residue 105°C, mg/L 3400 3600 3000 3400Carbonate, mg/L 1 1 < 1 < 1
Bicarbonate, mg/L 295 309 188 456
Chloride, mg/L 3095 2751 1685 1857
Sulfite, mg/L 37 43 61 14
Nitrite, mg/L 50 90 < 10 < 10
Nitrate, mg/L 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7
Amony, mg/L 9 2 3 13
Calcium, mg/L 200 160 160 160
Magnesium, mg/L 1 1 < 12 < 1
Iron, mg/L 1 1 2 1
Tests on frac fluid (hydration, viscosity, vortex time, and pH) showed normal values, denoting no out-of-range values.
Finally, rheometer tests were performed to determine the viscosity profile behavior. The tests were conducted at 180°F
(LGB-MT) for the four samples (Fig. 19, Tests 26, 27, 28, and 29).
Only the fluid formulated with the Source O sample met the requirements to be used (Fig. 19, Test 28).
Fig. 19—Viscosity profile-behavior tests.
Practice of Using Produced Water Interrupted. During May 2010, a screenout increase of 9% (based on a monthly
average) was recorded. A quick review of the fluid compositions used on the treatments that had ascreenout revealed poor
fluid properties with the produced water used. A considerable loss of viscosity was observed on tests performed in the
rheometer. Use of produced water was immediately stopped and only fresh water was used.
In Fig. 20, three viscosity profiles can be observed from the fluid prepared with fresh water (Test 30: tap water) and the
same fluid prepared with produced water from Source G (Test 31), with a difference in viscosity of > 1,000 cp between both
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 21/25
SPE 151819 21
profiles being highly noticeable. Additionally, the fluid viscosity profile formulated with a higher polymer load (Test 32) can
be observed, with an improvement between 500 to 600 cp.
Fig. 20—Viscosity profile-behavior tests.
After approximately a 20-day produced-water-use interruption, activity resumed using a 35-ppt polymer load fluid,
mainly for wells with temperatures higher than 180°F, as well as in field sector sources LM-LMS (Source O). Additionally, it
was advisable to continue most preblender unit jobs.
Activity. The activity at that time consisted of 412 treatments, which represents 54% of the total number of treatments. This
practice was spread out over 18 fields according to geographical proximity to loading platforms.
The largest development was located at Cañadon Grande, Cerro Dragón, La Madreselva, La Madreselva Sur, Oriental,
Resero, Rio Chico, Valle Hermoso, and Zorro, where 90% of the operations were performed using 92% of the total amount
of water used (Fig. 21). Table 13 presents more information with respect to activity in 2010.
TABLE 13—ACTIVITY 2010
FieldsCañadónGrande
CerroDragón
LaMadreselva
LaMadreselva
Sur Oriental ReseroRio
ChicoV.
Hermoso Zorro Other
Wells 13 14 8 15 4 26 4 31 18 13
Frac
stages
23 25 25 50 21 76 14 95 52 31
Avg depth,m
1842 1884 2044 2058 1905 2065 890 1586 2025 1468
Avg temp,°F
170 175 178 193 176 190 120 157 183 148
Frac fluid LGB-MT LGB-MT LGB-MT LGB-MT LGB-MT
LGB-MT
LBG-LT
LGB-MT <
LGB-MT
LGB-MT& LT
Fluidvolume,m
3
967 1086 1020 2646 698 3742 562 6480 1738 928
Fresh-water reduction in consumption for 2010 (412 fracturing treatments) was 55%; this means 21,805 m 3 produced
water was used (5.76 million gal) (Fig. 12).
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 22/25
22 SPE 151819
Fig. 21—Areas of produced water 2010.
Future ActionsIn the last few years, the operator and service company have worked mainly on identification and selection of water sources
and their use to meet certain requirements. This has allowed modification of fracturing-fluid formulations used in the field on
a daily basis. During that time, water sources that did not have a good performance with the fracturing fluid were not
selected.
To accomplish all of the operator’s objectives using these water sources in fracturing operations, it is necessary to propose
different alternatives to be evaluated and applied, some examples of which are listed in the next sections.
Fit Water Sources. A water-source control was conducted, which presented a salinity increase in the west sector of the area;
two sectors with useful viable sources were identified:
Cerro Dragón (CD) and Cañadón Grande (CG) fields.
La Madreselva (LM) and La Madreselva Sur (LMS) fields have a less quality degree, though still fit for use.
High-volume loading platforms are being built in both sectors (CD-CG and LM-LMS), which will start operating at the beginning of 2012 (Fig. 22). By means of these new volume loading capibilities, the operator will be able to comply with
100% of the supply of the operations that use low-salinity waters. This fact has required an investment of approximately USD
500,000.
ANTICLINAL
FUNES
ANTICLINAL
GRANDE SUR
HUETEL
BAYO
CHULENGO
MESETA
CATORCE
ESCORIAL
ORIENTAL
OESTE ORIENTAL
LA MADRESELVA
SUR
LA MADRESELVAVALLE
MARTIN
TRES PICOS
ZORRO
RESERO
CAÑADON
GRANDE
CERRO D RAGON
CERRO
TORTUGA
CAÑADON
PEDRO
EL
GATOVALLE HERMOSO
VALLE HERMOSO
NORTE
LAS FLORES
RIO CHICO
EL
TRIANGULO
PADRE CORTIEL CONDOR
PAMPA
PAMPA
SUR
SAN AGUSTIN
LA PIEDRA
EL KIKEN
MARIANA
JORGE
ANTICLINAL
GRANDE
SourceWater
SourceWater
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 23/25
SPE 151819 23
Fig. 22—Loading platforms.
Unfit Water Sources. The sources that currently do not comply with requirements have been evaluated for other uses. Other
kinds of treatments are under evaluation.
Current uses: low-quality water sources are being used in fluid completion, mainly perforation muds.
Alternatives:o Water blends — unfit water sources and good-quality fresh water diluted in different percentages are being
evaluated so that fracturing fluids more sensitive to salinity levels can be tested. This tends to be a frequent
practice in the industry.
o Water treatment — a water-treatment settling plant is being evaluated with ultrafiltration membranes that
allows removing salt from water and using it in highly demanding treatments (energy-generating plants). It
has been purported to use this treatment method on produced waters for critical operations. One of the main
limits is that produced waters tend to contain hydrocarbon traces, which is highly damaging for
membranes.
Freshwater Sources (Unfit for Human Consumption). These waters are fit for animal consumption, but not for humans.
This water source belongs to the Patagoniano aquifer, which contains excessively high-salinity levels for human
consumption. There is an upstreaming plan to obtain these waters for specific uses (more sensitive frac fluids, perforation
muds used on pipe guides).
Other Technologies. The recent boom in the US of nonconventional reservoir exploitation, in which hydraulic stimulation is
essential with the use of large water volumes, has generated a significant technology development associated to use,
handling, and reuse of this source, as well as fracturing fluids.
The following is a set of technologies that could be applied at different stages of the process; these could also be used
with different kinds of water qualities.
Ultraviolet (UV) light — this process uses UV light energy instead of chemicals to control bacteria. The fluids are
pumped through UV light sources where the UV light passes through the liquid media (water) and the bacteria’s cell
wall. Exposure to UV light disrupts the organism’s DNA , rendering it unable to reproduce. Water turbidity can have
a negative effect on disinfection results; in some cases, it is necessary to use a prefilter when there are high turbidity
values. This system is set on a mobile piece of equipment, which offers a working system of up to 100 bbl/min, the
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 24/25
24 SPE 151819
same has been used with different types of fluids, such as slickwater, water frac, and crossliker fluid (Gloe et al.
2009; Crane et al. 2011).
Electrocoagulation — this system uses an electrical process that has the capacity to destabilize and coagulate
suspended colloidal matter in water. When contaminated water passes through the electrocoagulation cells, the
anodic process releases positively charged ions that bind onto the negatively charged colloidal particles in water,
resulting in coagulation. This technology is used for treating well flowback water for reuse in subsequent operations.
Among its benefits, it reduces 99% of the total suspended solids (TSS), coagulates particles smaller than a micron,
reduces turbidity of at least 10NTU, removes divalent and heavy metals, and breaks emulsions. This system is set ona mobile piece of equipment that has a working system of up to 20 bbl/min (Rodvelt et al. 2011).
ConclusionsThe following conclusions are a result of this work.
Water Source. A large number of water sources within the field have been tested over a six year period. The following has
been determined.
Waters in general present a salinity increase in the west sector of the Cerro Dragón field.
Currently, some water sources have been tested in four geographical areas within the Cerro Dragón field (CD-CG;
VH; LM-LMS and Z-O-R).
Until now, two sectors, CD-CG fields and LM-LMS (lesser quality), have been localized, where said sources are
being used.
Sources have been identified in the Zorro and Oriental fields that could be considered to start an initial plan in thearea.
The best water source identified was Source G (loading platform ICD-13, Cerro Dragón).
These water sources over time have shown important variations in their properties; therefore, it is advisable to take
periodic samples and perform tests with fracturing fluids.
The main problems detected were associated with the presence of bacteria, identifying favorable temperature
conditions, pH, and impurities in water.
Bacteriological-test results revealed the presence of bacteria in smaller proportions than were thought to cause fluid
instability; however, viscosity-loss effects were observed.
Practice and Methodology. Over time, the following items were achieved in relation to the developed methodology.
It was determined that a water-charge and transportation system (trucks) must be well-identified and must not have
contaminating substances.
A methodology for the use of fracturing-fluid produced water was developed and used.The use of a preblending unit for this practice was implemented to complement and improve logistics, achieving a
two-hour time savings per treatment, on average.
This preblending unit was initially used in small-volume operations (40 m 3); however, in 2011, it was used on
operations with large volumes (150 m3).
Fracturing Fluids and Scope. The following items were achieved in relation to fracturing fluids and scope.
Four fracturing fluids were tested (LGB-MT, LGB-LT, LCMHPGZr-HT, and GB-HT), obtaining good results only
from LGB-MT fluid, and proportionally less with LGB-LT fluid.
From 2005 to present, water-use percentage has increased on a yearly basis, and an important reduction in fresh
water consumption has been achieved, reaching values of 55% and 21,805 m3 (5.76 million gal) (Fig. 12).
A larger area than anticipated was involved in the use of this practice within the Cerro Dragón field (initially two
fields, currently more than 18 fields) (Fig. 21).
It will be necessary to conduct tests with fracturing fluids (LGB-LT, LCMHPGZr-HT, and GB-HT) using otherviable alternatives, such as water-blend use (fresh-produced) and fresh water unfit for human consumption
(Patagoniano aquifer).
8/13/2019 Reduccion Del Consumo de Agua en Fracturamiento Hidraulico
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reduccion-del-consumo-de-agua-en-fracturamiento-hidraulico 25/25
SPE 151819 25
Nomenclature
bbl/min = barrel per minute
CD = Cerro Dragón
CG = Cañadón Grande
DNA = desoxy ribonucleic acid
GB-HT = guar borate-high temperature
GSJB = Golfo San Jorge Basin LCMHPGZr-HT = low CMHPG zirconate-high temperature
LGB-LT = low guar borate-low temperature
LGB-MT = low guar borate-medium temperature
LGC = liquid gel concentrates
LM = La Madreselva
LMS = La Madreselva Sur
NTU = nephelometric turbidity units
O = Oriental
ppm = parts per million
R = Resero
SS = settleable solids
TSS = total suspended solid
UV = ultraviolet
VH = Valle Hermoso
Z = Zorro
AcknowledgementsThe authors thank PAE and Halliburton for permission to publish this paper and for all the support provided during its
development.
ReferencesCrane, B., Neal, G., and Warren, W. 2011. Improved Process Provides More Effective Ultraviolet Light Disinfection of Fracturing Fluids.
Paper SPE 142217 presented at the SPE Americas E&P Health, Safety, and Environment Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 21 – 23March. doi: 10.2118/142217-MS.
Gloe, L., Neal. G., and Kleinwolterink, K.. 2009. Ultraviolet Light Disinfection of Fracturing Fluids. Paper SPE 126851 presented at theSPE International Health, Safety, and Environment Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 12 – 14 April. doi: 10.2118/126851-MS.
Harnes, R., Parker, M., Slabaugh, B., Weaver, J., and Walters, H. 2003. Analytical Methods for Maintaining Quality Assurance ofRecycled Fracturing Fluids. Paper SPE 80221 presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry Houston, Texas,
USA, 5 – 8 February. doi: 10.2118/80221-MS.Harris, P. and Walters, H. 2000. Real Time Control of Low Polymer Fracturing Fluids. Paper SPE 63238 presented at the SPE Annual
Technical Meeting, Dallas, Texas, USA, 1 – 4 October. doi: 10.2118/63238-MS.Huang, F., Gundewar, F., Steed, D., and Loughridge, B. 2005. Feasibility of Using Produced Water for Crosslinked Gel-Based Hydraulic
Fracturing. Paper SPE 94320 presented at the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 17 – 19April. doi: 10.2118/94320-MS.
Parker, M., Slabaugh, B., Walters, H., Weaver, J., and Hanes, R.M. 2003a. New Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Technology Reduces ImpactOn The Environment Trough Recovery And Reuse. Paper SPE 80590 presented at the SPE/EPA/DOE Exploration and ProductionEnvironmental Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 10 – 12 March. doi: 10.2118/80590-MS.
Parker, M., Slabaugh, B., Walters, H., Hart, T., Walsh, H., Haley, W., Harper, J., and Weaver, J. 2003b. New Hydraulic Fracturing-FluidTechnology Increases Production in the Barnett Shale and Reduces Impact on the Environment. Paper SPE 80912 presented at theSPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 23 – 25 March. doi: 10.2118/80912-MS.Rodvelt, G.,Yeager, V., and Hyatt, M. 2011. Case History: Challenges Using Ultraviolet Light to Control Bacteria in Marcellus Completions.
Paper SPE 149445 presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 17 – 19 April. doi: 10.2118/149445-MS.Walters, H., Stegent, N., and Harris, P. 2009. New Frac Fluid Provides Excellent Proppant Transport and High Conductivity. Paper SPE
119380 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 19 – 21 January. doi:10.2118/119380-MS.
Weinstein, J., Phillippi, M., and Walters, H. 2009. Dry-Polymer Blending Eliminates Need for Hydrocarbon Carrier Fluids. Paper SPE121002 presented at the SPE Americas E&P Environmental & Safety Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 23 – 25 March. doi:10.2118/121002-MS.
Yeager, R. and Bailey, D. 1988. Diesel-Based Gel Concentrate Improves Rocky Mountain Region Fracture Treatments. Paper SPE 17535
presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming, USA, 11 – 13 May. doi: 10.2118/17535-MS.
Top Related